• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾听女性声音:一项患者及公众参与活动,探索为遭受女性生殖器切割(FGM)的英国女性进行外阴重建手术。

Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

作者信息

Albert Juliet, Fyle Janet, Kartallozi Njomeza, Coho Christie, Otoo-Oyortey Naana, Papadaki Hekate, Evans Catrin, Saidan Dalia, Elneil Sohier, Anderson-Foster Natasha, Abdulcadir Jasmine, Mohamed Huda, Almadori Aurora

机构信息

Imperial College Division of Womens, Children and Clinical Support, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICHNT) and Imperial College London, London, UK.

Royal College of Midwives, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70275. doi: 10.1111/hex.70275.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70275
PMID:40353489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12067389/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.

METHODS

A national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (n = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (n = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.

RESULTS

Key insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage 'minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority' and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.

摘要

引言

本文介绍了患者和公众参与及介入(PPIE)工作,旨在探讨女性生殖器切割(FGM)幸存者及利益相关者对重建手术、潜在服务模式、护理途径、获取障碍及其他支持需求的看法。目的是确定研究重点,识别关键主题,并为该领域的后续研究提供参考。

方法

成立了一个全国性研究团队,由20多名利益相关者组成,包括FGM幸存者/有实际经历的女性、医疗保健专业人员、学者和倡导团体。该团队与FGM幸存者举办了两次讨论研讨会(11名参与者)、两次全国性利益相关者活动(142名与会者),并开展了重要的宣传和建立伙伴关系活动。

结果

关键见解是,FGM幸存者重视通过重建手术解决身体形象问题、生殖器疼痛和性方面的困难。手术的潜在障碍包括耻辱感、安全保障问题、缺乏认识和恐惧。在女性对阴蒂解剖结构、FGM类型和专科服务的了解方面发现了重大差距。幸存者和利益相关者强调,需要通过包括创伤咨询和性心理治疗在内的全面护理途径来补充手术重建。

结论

本研究强调了以幸存者为主导的方法对FGM服务发展的重要性,因为FGM幸存者的声音往往未被纳入。该活动表明,采用正确的方法,有可能让“来自全球多数群体的少数化社区/个人”参与进来,并且这些社区表现出相当大的意愿参与这个敏感的研究领域。它还强调迫切需要以受影响者的声音为依据,提供可及的、高质量的FGM护理,以改善英国FGM幸存者的治疗效果并为其提供支持。

患者或公众贡献

有FGM实际经历的女性和来自受FGM影响社区的女性,以及其他国家利益相关者(包括与FGM幸存者合作的非政府组织和慈善机构、学者、艺术家和活动家)参与了本研究的设计与实施、数据的分析与解读以及稿件的撰写。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/033c51c43fae/HEX-28-e70275-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/470a31e81a4c/HEX-28-e70275-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/29dec403ced0/HEX-28-e70275-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/033c51c43fae/HEX-28-e70275-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/470a31e81a4c/HEX-28-e70275-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/29dec403ced0/HEX-28-e70275-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/12067389/033c51c43fae/HEX-28-e70275-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).倾听女性声音:一项患者及公众参与活动,探索为遭受女性生殖器切割(FGM)的英国女性进行外阴重建手术。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70275. doi: 10.1111/hex.70275.
2
Views of female genital mutilation survivors, men and health-care professionals on timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS service provision: qualitative FGM Sister Study.女性外阴残割幸存者、男性和医疗保健专业人员对切开术时间和国民保健制度服务提供的看法:女性外阴残割姐妹研究的定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Mar;27(3):1-113. doi: 10.3310/JHWE4771.
3
Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study.探索女性生殖器切割幸存者、其男性伴侣及医疗保健专业人员对阴蒂切开术手术时机及英国国家医疗服务体系女性生殖器切割护理服务的看法(女性生殖器切割姐妹研究):一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 17;9(10):e034140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140.
4
Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies.女性生殖器切割术后的阴蒂重建:病例研究
J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):274-81. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12737. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
Examining the key features of specialist health service provision for women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the Global North: a scoping review.审视全球北方地区为遭受女性生殖器切割/环切(FGM/C)的女性提供专科医疗服务的关键特征:一项范围综述
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 May 22;5:1329819. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1329819. eCollection 2024.
6
A multidisciplinary approach to clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation: the crucial role of counselling.女性生殖器切割术后阴蒂重建的多学科方法:咨询的关键作用。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Aug;21(4):269-75. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2016.1172063. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
An exploration of attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in men and women accessing FGM clinical services in London: a pilot study.对伦敦接受女性生殖器切割临床服务的男性和女性对女性生殖器切割态度的探索:一项试点研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;38(7):1005-1009. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1437718. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines.以女性和女孩为中心的关爱服务,以满足女性外阴残割行为受影响者的需求:服务提供者工具和指南的范围综述。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01356-3.
9
Reasons for and Experiences With Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review.女性生殖器切割手术干预的原因及经历:一项系统综述
J Sex Med. 2017 Aug;14(8):977-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Exploring young people's interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach.采用社区参与式研究方法探索英国年轻人对女性割礼的理解。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09183-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconstructive surgery for women with female genital mutilation: A scoping review.女性外阴残割女性的重建手术:范围综述。
BJOG. 2024 Nov;131(12):1604-1619. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17886. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Public involvement and engagement in scientific research and higher education: the only way is ethics?公众参与科学研究和高等教育:唯一的途径是道德规范吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 31;10(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00587-x.
3
Views of female genital mutilation survivors, men and health-care professionals on timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS service provision: qualitative FGM Sister Study.
女性外阴残割幸存者、男性和医疗保健专业人员对切开术时间和国民保健制度服务提供的看法:女性外阴残割姐妹研究的定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Mar;27(3):1-113. doi: 10.3310/JHWE4771.
4
Co-designing a cancer care intervention: reflections of participants and a doctoral researcher on roles and contributions.共同设计癌症护理干预措施:参与者和一位博士研究生对角色与贡献的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 2;8(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00373-7.
5
A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals.基于项目和伙伴关系目标选择参与式研究方法指南。
J Particip Res Methods. 2022;3(1). doi: 10.35844/001c.32605. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Available evidence suggests that prevalence and risk of female genital cutting/mutilation in the UK is much lower than widely presumed - policies based on exaggerated estimates are harmful to girls and women from affected communities.现有证据表明,英国女性生殖器切割/ mutilation的流行率和风险远低于普遍推测——基于夸大估计制定的政策对受影响社区的女孩和妇女有害。 (注:“mutilation”常见释义为“残害”“毁伤” ,这里结合语境可能是女性生殖器切割相关的特定表述,暂保留英文未翻译,需结合更专业背景确定准确译法 )
Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):212-215. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00526-4. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
7
Pleasure, womanhood and the desire for reconstructive surgery after female genital cutting in Belgium.快感、女性特质和对女性生殖器切割后重建手术的渴望:在比利时。
Anthropol Med. 2022 Sep;29(3):237-254. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2021.1994332. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Clitoral reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: A systematic review.女性外阴残割术后的阴蒂重建手术:系统评价。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Sep;29:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100619. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
Categorisation and Minoritisation.分类与少数化
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004508.
10
Clitoral Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Review of Surgical Techniques and Ethical Debate.女性外阴残割/切割术后的阴蒂重建:手术技术回顾和伦理争议。
J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10.