Suppr超能文献

大都市社区的颈动脉内膜切除术:三家机构结果的比较。

Carotid endarterectomy in a metropolitan community: comparison of results from three institutions.

作者信息

Krupski W C, Effeney D J, Goldstone J, Deuel M, Webb R L, Etheredge S N, Ehrenfeld W K, Stoney R J

出版信息

Surgery. 1985 Sep;98(3):492-9.

PMID:4035569
Abstract

The hospitalizations of 300 patients who had carotid endarterectomies (CEA) in three different kinds of hospital were analyzed. 100 patients had CEA performed by experienced vascular surgeons in a university hospital (UH), 100 patients had CEA performed by experienced vascular surgeons in private community hospitals (PCH), and 100 patients had CEA performed by senior general surgery residents (GSR) assisted by experienced vascular surgeons in a university-affiliated Veterans Administration hospital (VA). Analysis of patient characteristics revealed that, compared with the other groups, VA patients were (1) younger (62 +/- 7 years; p less than 0.001); (2) had a higher frequency of peripheral vascular operations (51%; p less than 0.01; (3) were more often cigarette smokers (84%; p less than 0.001); and (4) had more contralateral carotid occlusions (19%) and ulcerated lesions (73%) (p less than 0.01). GSR had longer operating room times and cerebral ischemia times during shunt insertion and removal (6 +/- 2.8 minutes) and during the CEA (30 +/- 27 minutes) (p less than 0.001). Postoperative hypertension and neck hematomas were less common in PCH patients (p less than 0.001) than in the other groups. Although their duration of hospitalization (17 +/- 12 days) was longer, the VA patients experienced no increased morbidity. There was a high rate of cranial nerve injury in all groups (27%, 15%, 17%) but symptoms were not often permanent (9%, 6%, 6%). Our data indicate that results of vascular operations performed by well-supervised residents are comparable in all important respects to those performed by fully trained surgeons.

摘要

对在三种不同医院接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的300例患者的住院情况进行了分析。100例患者在大学医院(UH)由经验丰富的血管外科医生进行CEA,100例患者在私立社区医院(PCH)由经验丰富的血管外科医生进行CEA,100例患者在大学附属退伍军人管理局医院(VA)由资深普通外科住院医师(GSR)在经验丰富的血管外科医生协助下进行CEA。对患者特征的分析显示,与其他组相比,VA患者:(1)更年轻(62±7岁;p<0.001);(2)外周血管手术频率更高(51%;p<0.01);(3)吸烟的比例更高(84%;p<0.001);(4)对侧颈动脉闭塞和溃疡病变更多(分别为19%和73%)(p<0.01)。GSR在分流插入和移除期间(6±2.8分钟)以及CEA期间(30±27分钟)的手术室时间和脑缺血时间更长(p<0.001)。PCH患者术后高血压和颈部血肿比其他组少见(p<0.001)。虽然VA患者的住院时间(17±12天)更长,但他们的发病率并未增加。所有组的颅神经损伤发生率都很高(分别为27%、15%、17%),但症状通常并非永久性(分别为9%、6%、6%)。我们的数据表明,在充分监督下由住院医师进行的血管手术结果在所有重要方面与由训练有素的外科医生进行的手术结果相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验