Suppr超能文献

微创肝切除术治疗早期或中期肝细胞癌患者的疗效:一项亚洲人群多机构队列研究

Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in Patients with Early or Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study in an Asian Population.

作者信息

Chen Hung-Kai, Chang Kai-Cheng, Shao Shih-Chieh, Soong Ruey-Shyang, Chen Yi-Chan, Wu Chun-Feng, Wu Tsung-Han, Chou Tien-Shin, Chan Siu-Cheung, Lai Edward Chia-Cheng

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 May 7;12:879-890. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S485171. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has been increasingly applied for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effectiveness of MIH has yet to be well established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 20 years and older, newly receiving MIH for HCC with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification stage 0, A or B from 2010 to 2019. Two 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts of those receiving open hepatectomy (OH) and those receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were selected as comparison groups. As a control analysis, we compared patients receiving OH with those receiving RFA under the hypothesis that the OH group had better survival outcomes than the RFA group.

RESULTS

We included a total of 555 matched patients receiving MIH or OH, and 382 matched patients receiving MIH or RFA. Compared to the OH group, MIH group was associated with better overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratios (HR): 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) and similar PFS (HR: 0.92; 0.74-1.16). Compared to the RFA group, we found the MIH group was associated with better OS (0.46; 0.32-0.67) and better PFS (0.48; 0.38-0.61). We found consistent results from a series of subgroup analyses (eg, age groups, BCLC stages and hospital levels) and sensitivity analyses (eg, study period restricted to the most recent 5 years (2015-2019)). The control analysis (OH group vs RFA group) confirmed the robustness of main analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that MIH had better survival outcomes for patients with early or resectable intermediate-stage HCC, compared to RFA or OH.

摘要

目的

微创肝切除术(MIH)已越来越多地应用于肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。然而,MIH的有效性尚未得到充分证实。

患者与方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2010年至2019年期间年龄在20岁及以上、新接受MIH治疗的HCC患者,其巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期为0、A或B期。选择两个1:1倾向评分匹配队列,分别为接受开放性肝切除术(OH)的患者和接受射频消融(RFA)的患者作为比较组。作为对照分析,我们在假设OH组生存结局优于RFA组的前提下,比较了接受OH的患者与接受RFA的患者。

结果

我们共纳入了555例接受MIH或OH的匹配患者,以及382例接受MIH或RFA的匹配患者。与OH组相比,MIH组的总生存期(OS)更好(风险比(HR):0.62;95%置信区间:0.43 - 0.88),无进展生存期(PFS)相似(HR:0.92;0.74 - 1.16)。与RFA组相比,我们发现MIH组的OS更好(0.46;0.32 - 0.67),PFS也更好(0.48;0.38 - 0.61)。我们从一系列亚组分析(如年龄组、BCLC分期和医院级别)和敏感性分析(如将研究期限制在最近5年(2015 - 2019年))中得到了一致的结果。对照分析(OH组与RFA组)证实了主要分析结果的稳健性。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于早期或可切除的中期HCC患者,与RFA或OH相比,MIH具有更好的生存结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/12067648/ec9b17288ac7/JHC-12-879-g0001.jpg

相似文献

7
Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Malignancies in Patients with Low-MELD Cirrhosis.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2424-2433. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05817-3. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
10
Textbook outcome in liver surgery: open vs minimally invasive hepatectomy among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Apr;28(4):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.037. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
A Noninvasive Approach to Evaluate Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Predict Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Phenomics. 2023 Dec 8;3(6):549-564. doi: 10.1007/s43657-023-00136-8. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Minimally Invasive versus Open Liver Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 25;13(19):4800. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194800.
5
Risk of Heart Failure in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;110(6):1595-1603. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2415. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
9
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jun 24;11:5711-5724. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S189777. eCollection 2019.
10
Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: past and future.
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May 3;11:349-358. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S196293. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验