• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用XGBoost-SHAP方法理解生态脆弱地区生态系统服务权衡效应及驱动机制。

Using XGBoost-SHAP for understanding the ecosystem services trade-off effects and driving mechanisms in ecologically fragile areas.

作者信息

Du Peiyu, Huai Heju, Wu Xiaoyang, Wang Hongjia, Liu Wen, Tang Xiumei

机构信息

Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.

National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 28;16:1552818. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1552818. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2025.1552818
PMID:40357153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066793/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the spatial and temporal variability of Ecosystem services (ES), along with the trade-offs and synergies among different services, is crucial for effective ecosystem management and sustainable regional development. This study focuses on Wensu, Xinjiang, China, as a case study to address these challenges.

METHODS

ES and their trade-offs were systematically assessed from 1990 to 2020. Explainable machine learning models (XGBoost-SHAP) were employed to quantify the nonlinear effects and threshold effects of ES trade-offs, with specific attention to identifying their driving factors.

RESULTS

(1) From 1990 to 2020, water yield (WY) and soil conservation (SC) exhibited an inverted "N"-shaped downward trend in Wensu County: mean annual WY decreased from 22.99 mm to 21.32 mm, and SC per unit area declined from 1440.28 t/km² to 1351.3 t/km². Conversely, windbreak and sand fixation (WS) showed an "N"-shaped increase from 2.32×10⁷ t to 3.11×10⁷ t. Habitat quality (HQ) initially improved then deteriorated, with values of 0.596, 0.603, 0.519, and 0.507 sequentially. (2) Relationships between WY-WS, WY-HQ, WS-HQ, SC-WS, and SC-HQ were primarily tradeoffs, whereas WY-SC interactions were synergistic. Trade-offs for SC-HQ, WY-HQ, and WS-HQ were stronger, while WY-SC trade-offs were weaker. (3) The XGBoost-SHAP model revealed land use type (Land), precipitation (Pre), and temperature (Tem) as dominant drivers of trade-offs, demonstrating nonlinear responses and threshold effects. For instance, WY-SC trade-offs intensified when precipitation exceeded 17 mm, while temperature thresholds governed WY-HQ trade-off/synergy transitions.

DISCUSSION

This study advances the identification of nonlinear and threshold effects in ES trade-off drivers. The model's interpretability in capturing these complexities clarifies the mechanisms underlying ES dynamics. Findings are generalizable to other ecologically vulnerable regions, offering critical insights for ecosystem management and conservation strategies in comparable environments.

摘要

引言

了解生态系统服务(ES)的时空变异性,以及不同服务之间的权衡和协同作用,对于有效的生态系统管理和区域可持续发展至关重要。本研究以中国新疆温宿县为例,以应对这些挑战。

方法

系统评估了1990年至2020年期间的生态系统服务及其权衡。采用可解释机器学习模型(XGBoost-SHAP)来量化生态系统服务权衡的非线性效应和阈值效应,特别关注识别其驱动因素。

结果

(1)1990年至2020年期间,温宿县的产水量(WY)和土壤保持(SC)呈倒“N”形下降趋势:年平均产水量从22.99毫米降至21.32毫米,单位面积土壤保持量从1440.28吨/平方公里降至1351.3吨/平方公里。相反,防风固沙(WS)呈“N”形增加,从2.32×10⁷吨增至3.11×10⁷吨。栖息地质量(HQ)先改善后恶化,依次为0.596、0.603、0.519和0.507。(2)WY-WS、WY-HQ、WS-HQ、SC-WS和SC-HQ之间的关系主要是权衡关系,而WY-SC之间存在协同作用。SC-HQ、WY-HQ和WS-HQ之间的权衡关系更强,而WY-SC之间的权衡关系较弱。(3)XGBoost-SHAP模型表明土地利用类型(Land)、降水量(Pre)和温度(Tem)是权衡关系的主要驱动因素,呈现出非线性响应和阈值效应。例如,当降水量超过17毫米时,WY-SC之间的权衡加剧,而温度阈值决定了WY-HQ之间的权衡/协同转变。

讨论

本研究推进了对生态系统服务权衡驱动因素中非线性和阈值效应的识别。该模型在捕捉这些复杂性方面的可解释性阐明了生态系统服务动态背后的机制。研究结果可推广到其他生态脆弱地区,为类似环境下的生态系统管理和保护策略提供关键见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/e962567edce5/fpls-16-1552818-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/5cbd995a0134/fpls-16-1552818-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/fe23c3014b76/fpls-16-1552818-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/33f684b7d6d1/fpls-16-1552818-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/5c690ac1f37b/fpls-16-1552818-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/a6672762af69/fpls-16-1552818-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/05bb797f7dcd/fpls-16-1552818-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/8a88cbc3707d/fpls-16-1552818-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/e962567edce5/fpls-16-1552818-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/5cbd995a0134/fpls-16-1552818-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/fe23c3014b76/fpls-16-1552818-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/33f684b7d6d1/fpls-16-1552818-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/5c690ac1f37b/fpls-16-1552818-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/a6672762af69/fpls-16-1552818-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/05bb797f7dcd/fpls-16-1552818-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/8a88cbc3707d/fpls-16-1552818-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118d/12066793/e962567edce5/fpls-16-1552818-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Using XGBoost-SHAP for understanding the ecosystem services trade-off effects and driving mechanisms in ecologically fragile areas.使用XGBoost-SHAP方法理解生态脆弱地区生态系统服务权衡效应及驱动机制。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 28;16:1552818. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1552818. eCollection 2025.
2
Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table.识别生态系统服务包以及高地下水位采煤区权衡和协同作用的时空特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 3):151036. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151036. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Spatial heterogeneity and management challenges of ecosystem service trade-offs: a case study in Guangdong Province, China.生态系统服务权衡的空间异质性与管理挑战:以中国广东省为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;73(2):378-394. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01851-8. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Scale dependency of trade-offs/synergies analysis of ecosystem services based on Bayesian Belief Networks: A case of the Yellow River Basin.基于贝叶斯信念网络的生态系统服务权衡/协同分析的尺度依赖性:以黄河流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Feb;375:124410. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124410. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
5
Spatial Responses of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs and Synergies to Impact Factors in Liaoning Province.辽宁省生态系统服务权衡与协同对影响因素的空间响应
Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;75(1):111-123. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01919-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
6
Trade-Off Analyses of Multiple Ecosystem Services and Their Drivers in the Shandong Yellow River Basin.山东黄河流域多种生态系统服务权衡及其驱动因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315681.
7
Spatiotemporal effects of landscape structure on the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem service functions in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.中国长江经济带景观结构对生态系统服务功能之间权衡与协同作用的时空效应
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99295-z.
8
Scale-dependent responses of ecosystem service trade-offs to urbanization in Erhai Lake Basin, China.中国洱海流域生态系统服务权衡对城市化的尺度响应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(57):120663-120682. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30885-y. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
9
Spatial-temporal heterogeneity in the influence of landscape patterns on trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services: a case study of the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi.景观格局对生态系统服务权衡/协同作用影响的时空异质性:以陕北黄土高原为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):6144-6159. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31521-5. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
10
Multiscale ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs and their driving mechanisms in the Han River Basin, China: implications for watershed management.中国汉江流域多尺度生态系统服务协同/权衡及其驱动机制:对流域管理的启示
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):43440-43454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25248-6. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions.土地利用/土地覆被变化对生态脆弱区生态系统服务的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 20;831:154967. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154967. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Integrating ecosystem services modeling into effectiveness assessment of national protected areas in a typical arid region in China.将生态系统服务模型纳入中国典型干旱地区国家自然保护区有效性评估。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 1;297:113408. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113408. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Current situation and prospects of the studies of ecological industries and ecological products in eco-fragile areas.
生态脆弱区生态产业与生态产品研究的现状与展望。
Environ Res. 2021 Oct;201:111613. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111613. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Ecosystem service value assessment of a natural reserve region for strengthening protection and conservation.加强保护和保育的自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Aug 15;244:208-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.095. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services.自然为本解决方案在土地管理中增强生态系统服务方面的优越效应。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:997-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
6
Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China.生态系统服务权衡及其影响因素:以中国黄土高原为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;607-608:1250-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.079. Epub 2017 Jul 17.