Suppr超能文献

个性与良好的商业判断力:商业推理的光明面与阴暗面。

Personality and good business judgement: the bright and dark side of business reasoning.

作者信息

Furnham Adrian, Sherman Ryne A

机构信息

BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Marketing, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 28;16:1565485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565485. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The current study explored the relationship between measures of "bright-side" and "dark-side" personality traits and business reasoning (BR)/judgment using the Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory (HBRI). Participants were a global sample ( = 2,342) who completed the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), a bright-side trait measure; the Hogan Development Survey (HDS), a dark-side trait measure; and the HBRI, which is similar to a measure of general cognitive ability. The analyses showed gender effects (men scored higher) but not age effects. Correlation and regression analyses showed that Learning Approach and Adjustment traits were positively associated with business reasoning, while Prudence and Inquisitive traits were negatively associated with business reasoning. In cases where significant dark-side factor relationships were observed, they were negatively associated with business reasoning, except for Reserved and Imaginative traits. However, these traits accounted for relatively little of the variance (approximately 5%) in business reasoning. Stable, ambitious, and intellectually curious individuals who are not high on Conscientiousness and have few dark-side traits appear to be better at business reasoning.

摘要

本研究使用霍根商业推理量表(HBRI)探讨了“光明面”和“黑暗面”人格特质的测量指标与商业推理(BR)/判断之间的关系。参与者是一个全球样本(n = 2342),他们完成了霍根人格量表(HPI,一种光明面特质测量工具)、霍根发展调查(HDS,一种黑暗面特质测量工具)以及与一般认知能力测量工具类似的HBRI。分析显示存在性别效应(男性得分更高),但不存在年龄效应。相关分析和回归分析表明,学习方式和适应特质与商业推理呈正相关,而审慎和好奇特质与商业推理呈负相关。在观察到显著的黑暗面因素关系的情况下,除了矜持和富有想象力特质外,它们与商业推理呈负相关。然而,这些特质在商业推理中所占的方差相对较小(约5%)。性格稳定、有抱负且求知欲强,但尽责性不高且黑暗面特质较少的个体似乎在商业推理方面表现更好。

相似文献

5
A bright side facet analysis of borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的明侧面分析。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Jun 11;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2051-6673-1-7. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

2
Intelligence, Personality and Tolerance of Ambiguity.智力、个性与对模糊性的容忍度。
J Intell. 2023 May 26;11(6):102. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060102.
3
Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability.人格与认知能力的元分析关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 6;120(23):e2212794120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212794120. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis.思维方式与决策:元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Mar;142(3):260-90. doi: 10.1037/bul0000027. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验