• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A bright side facet analysis of borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的明侧面分析。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Jun 11;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2051-6673-1-7. eCollection 2014.
2
A bright side, facet analysis of histrionic personality disorder: the relationship between the HDS Colourful factor and the NEO-PI-R facets in a large adult sample.表演型人格障碍的积极面、层面分析:在一个大型成年样本中,表演型人格障碍量表色彩因子与大五人格量表层面之间的关系
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov-Dec;154(6):527-36. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.953026.
3
Personality correlates of passive-aggressiveness: a NEO-PI-R domain and facet analysis of the HDS Leisurely scale.被动攻击行为的人格相关性:HDS Leisurely 量表的 NEO-PI-R 域和方面分析。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):496-501. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167853. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
A Big Five facet analysis of sub-clinical narcissism: understanding boldness in terms of well-known personality traits.亚临床自恋的大五人格特质分析:从著名人格特质角度理解果敢性
Personal Ment Health. 2014 Aug;8(3):209-17. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1262. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
5
A Big Five facet analysis of sub-clinical dependent personality disorder (Dutifulness).依赖型人格障碍亚临床症状的大五因素分析(尽责性)。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:622-626. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.052. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
A Big Five facet analysis of a psychopath: The validity of the HDS mischievous scale of sub-clinical psychopathy.对一名精神病态者的大五人格特质分析:亚临床精神病态的HDS恶作剧量表的效度
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Apr;57(2):117-21. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12260. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
7
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Borderline and avoidant personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: a comparison between DSM-IV diagnoses and NEO-PI-R.边缘型人格障碍与回避型人格障碍及人格五因素模型:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版诊断与大五人格量表的比较
J Pers Disord. 1999 Fall;13(3):226-40. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.3.226.
9
Doctors in distress: The personality profile of derailing doctors.困境中的医生:脱轨医生的人格特征。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;69(1):182-189. doi: 10.1177/00207640221075585. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Anxious, introverted personality traits in patients with chronic subjective dizziness.慢性主观性头晕患者的焦虑、内向人格特质。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jan;76(1):80-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The structure of personality disorders: comparing the DSM-IV-TR Axis II classification with the five-factor model framework using structural equation modeling.人格障碍的结构:使用结构方程模型比较 DSM-IV-TR 轴 II 分类与五因素模型框架。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):378-96. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.378.
2
Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: a proposal for DSM-V.整合正常和异常人格结构:DSM-V 的建议。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):338-63. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.338.
3
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis.五因素模型与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)人格障碍之间关系的元分析综述:层面水平分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1326-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
4
Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: data from 50 cultures.从观察者角度看人格特质的普遍特征:来自50种文化的数据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):547-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547.
5
Schizothymia-cyclothymia as a dimension of personality. II. Experimental.
J Pers. 1952 Mar;20(3):345-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1952.tb01115.x.
6
The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review.五因素模型与人格障碍实证文献:一项元分析综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;23(8):1055-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001.

边缘型人格障碍的明侧面分析。

A bright side facet analysis of borderline personality disorder.

机构信息

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Jun 11;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2051-6673-1-7. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/2051-6673-1-7
PMID:26401291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4579520/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study looks at the "bright-side" normal, personality trait correlates of the "dark-side" Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).

METHODS

Over 5000 British adults completed the NEO-PI-R which measures the Big Five Personality factors at the Domain and the Facet level, as well as the Hogan Development Survey which has a measure of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) called Excitable.

RESULTS

Correlation and regression results confirmed many of the associations between these "bright" and "dark" side individual difference variables. The Excitable score from the HDS was the criterion variable in all analyses. Excitable individuals are high on Neuroticism, but also Introverted and Disagreeable. The facet analysis identified Angry Hostility, Anxiety, Depression and Vulnerability as particularly characteristic of that type.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed work on BPD using different population groups and different measures, showing that it is possible to describe personality disorders in terms of extreme scores on personality traits.

摘要

背景

本研究着眼于“光明面”正常,即边缘型人格障碍(BPD)“黑暗面”的人格特质相关性。

方法

超过 5000 名英国成年人完成了 NEO-PI-R,该测试从领域和方面层面衡量了五大人格因素,以及 Hogan 发展调查,该调查中有一个称为易兴奋的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的衡量标准。

结果

相关和回归结果证实了这些“光明”和“黑暗”个体差异变量之间的许多关联。HDS 的易兴奋分数是所有分析的标准变量。易兴奋的个体在神经质方面得分较高,但也内向和不友善。方面分析确定愤怒敌意、焦虑、抑郁和脆弱性是该类型的特别特征。

结论

该研究使用不同的人群和不同的测量方法证实了 BPD 的工作,表明可以根据人格特质的极端分数来描述人格障碍。