• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别阿片类药物易感性的时空模式:探究残疾、处方阿片类药物与阿片类药物相关死亡率之间的联系。

Identifying spatiotemporal patterns in opioid vulnerability: investigating the links between disability, prescription opioids and opioid-related mortality.

作者信息

Deas Andrew, Spannaus Adam, Fernando Hashan, Hanson Heidi A, Kapadia Anuj J, Trafton Jodie, Maroulas Vasileios

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Circle Dr, Knoxville, 37916, TN, USA.

Computational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, 37830, TN, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 May 13;25(1):1759. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23044-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-23044-0
PMID:40361019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12070698/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The opioid crisis remains one of the most daunting and complex public health problems in the United States. This study investigates the national epidemic by analyzing vulnerability profiles of three key factors: opioid-related mortality rates, opioid prescription dispensing rates, and disability rank ordered rates.

METHODS

This study utilizes county level data, spanning the years 2014 through 2020, on the rates of opioid-related mortality, opioid prescription dispensing, and disability. To successfully estimate and predict trends in these opioid-related factors, we augment the Kalman Filter with a novel spatial component. To define opioid vulnerability profiles, we create heat maps of our filter's predicted rates across the nation's counties and identify the hotspots. In this context, hotspots are defined on a year-by-year basis as counties with rates in the top 5% nationally.

RESULTS

Our spatial Kalman filter demonstrates strong predictive performance. From 2014 to 2018, these predictions highlight consistent spatiotemporal patterns across all three factors, with Appalachia distinguished as the nation's most vulnerable region. Starting in 2019 however, the dispensing rate profiles undergo a dramatic and chaotic shift.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial primary drivers of opioid abuse in the Appalachian region were likely prescription opioids; however, it now appears that abuse is sustained by illegal drugs. Additionally, we find that the disabled subpopulation may be more at risk of opioid-related mortality than the general population. Public health initiatives must extend beyond controlling prescription practices to address the transition to and impact of illicit drug use.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物危机仍然是美国最严峻、最复杂的公共卫生问题之一。本研究通过分析三个关键因素的脆弱性概况来调查全国性的疫情:阿片类药物相关死亡率、阿片类药物处方配给率和残疾排名率。

方法

本研究利用了2014年至2020年县级层面关于阿片类药物相关死亡率、阿片类药物处方配给率和残疾率的数据。为了成功估计和预测这些与阿片类药物相关因素的趋势,我们用一个新的空间成分增强了卡尔曼滤波器。为了定义阿片类药物脆弱性概况,我们绘制了滤波器预测率在全国各县的热图,并确定了热点地区。在这种情况下,热点地区逐年定义为全国比率排名前5%的县。

结果

我们的空间卡尔曼滤波器显示出很强的预测性能。从2014年到2018年,这些预测突出了所有三个因素一致的时空模式,阿巴拉契亚地区被认为是全国最脆弱的地区。然而,从2019年开始,配给率概况发生了剧烈而混乱的变化。

结论

阿巴拉契亚地区阿片类药物滥用最初的主要驱动因素可能是处方阿片类药物;然而,现在看来,滥用是由非法药物维持的。此外,我们发现残疾亚人群体可能比一般人群面临更高的阿片类药物相关死亡风险。公共卫生举措必须超越控制处方行为,以应对向非法药物使用的转变及其影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/2b693fffbcf3/12889_2025_23044_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/7490aec3d1fa/12889_2025_23044_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/3a37ac021437/12889_2025_23044_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/fd872fe32f74/12889_2025_23044_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/deca44b6ffd0/12889_2025_23044_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/d88063ae624a/12889_2025_23044_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/7a22b23a2ad7/12889_2025_23044_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/48205d2ac7bd/12889_2025_23044_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/d619935ab48f/12889_2025_23044_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/2b693fffbcf3/12889_2025_23044_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/7490aec3d1fa/12889_2025_23044_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/3a37ac021437/12889_2025_23044_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/fd872fe32f74/12889_2025_23044_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/deca44b6ffd0/12889_2025_23044_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/d88063ae624a/12889_2025_23044_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/7a22b23a2ad7/12889_2025_23044_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/48205d2ac7bd/12889_2025_23044_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/d619935ab48f/12889_2025_23044_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/12070698/2b693fffbcf3/12889_2025_23044_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying spatiotemporal patterns in opioid vulnerability: investigating the links between disability, prescription opioids and opioid-related mortality.识别阿片类药物易感性的时空模式:探究残疾、处方阿片类药物与阿片类药物相关死亡率之间的联系。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 13;25(1):1759. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23044-0.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Correlations between opioid mortality increases related to illicit/synthetic opioids and reductions of medical opioid dispensing - exploratory analyses from Canada.与非法/合成阿片类药物相关的阿片类药物死亡率增加与医疗用阿片类药物配给减少之间的相关性——来自加拿大的探索性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8205-z.
4
Correlation of Opioid Mortality with Prescriptions and Social Determinants: A Cross-sectional Study of Medicare Enrollees.阿片类药物死亡率与处方和社会决定因素的相关性:对医疗保险参保者的横断面研究。
Drugs. 2018 Jan;78(1):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0846-6.
5
Effects of County-Level Opioid Dispensing Rates on Individual-Level Patterns of Prescription Opioid and Heroin Consumption: Evidence From National U.S. Data.县级阿片类药物配给率对个体处方类阿片和海洛因消费模式的影响:来自美国全国数据的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;179(4):305-311. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21060602. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Trends in Urine Drug Monitoring Among Persons Receiving Long-Term Opioids and Persons with Opioid Use Disorder in the United States.美国长期接受阿片类药物治疗的人群和阿片类药物使用障碍人群的尿液药物监测趋势。
Pain Physician. 2021 Mar;24(2):E249-E256.
7
Responsible Controlled Substance and Opioid Prescribing负责任的管制药品和阿片类药物处方开具
8
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.系统评价针对美国阿片类药物流行的国家政策干预措施,2007-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.
9
Prescription Opioid Laws and Opioid Dispensing in US Counties: Identifying Salient Law Provisions With Machine Learning.美国县的处方类阿片法律和类阿片药物配给:用机器学习识别显著法律条款。
Epidemiology. 2021 Nov 1;32(6):868-876. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001404.
10
Trends in opioid-related crime incidents and comparison with opioid overdose outcomes in the United States.美国阿片类药物相关犯罪事件的趋势及与阿片类药物过量结果的比较。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Mar;101:103555. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103555. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A spatiotemporal analysis of opioid prescriptions in Indiana from 2015 to 2019.2015年至2019年印第安纳州阿片类药物处方的时空分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Aug 8;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13011-025-00664-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for persistent fatal opioid-involved overdose clusters in Massachusetts 2011-2021: a spatial statistical analysis with socio-economic, accessibility, and prescription factors.2011-2021 年马萨诸塞州持续致命阿片类药物过量集群的风险因素:基于社会经济、可达性和处方因素的空间统计分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):1893. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19399-5.
2
Characterizing opioid overdose hotspots for place-based overdose prevention and treatment interventions: A geo-spatial analysis of Rhode Island, USA.基于地点的阿片类药物过量预防和治疗干预措施的热点地区特征:美国罗德岛的地理空间分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Mar;125:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104322. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
The Opioid Epidemic: A Review of the Contributing Factors, Negative Consequences, and Best Practices.
阿片类药物流行:促成因素、负面后果及最佳实践综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 10;15(7):e41621. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41621. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Social vulnerability predictors of drug poisoning mortality: A machine learning analysis in the United States.社会脆弱性预测药物中毒死亡率:美国的机器学习分析。
Am J Addict. 2023 Nov;32(6):539-546. doi: 10.1111/ajad.13445. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
Opioid-related mortality: Dynamic temporal and spatial trends by drug type and demographic subpopulations, Massachusetts, 2005-2021.阿片类药物相关死亡率:2005-2021 年马萨诸塞州按药物类型和人口亚群划分的动态时间和空间趋势。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 May 1;246:109836. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109836. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
6
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic, Social Vulnerability, and Opioid Overdoses in Chicago.新冠疫情、社会脆弱性及阿片类药物过量用药对芝加哥的影响
AJPM Focus. 2023 Jun;2(2):100086. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100086. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
7
A counterfactual analysis of opioid-involved deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic using a spatiotemporal random forest modeling approach.使用时空随机森林建模方法对 COVID-19 大流行期间涉及阿片类药物的死亡进行反事实分析。
Health Place. 2023 Mar;80:102986. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.102986. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
The relationship between Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) and death from cardiovascular disease or opioid use in counties across the United States (2009-2018).美国各县社会决定因素(SDoH)与心血管疾病或阿片类药物使用导致的死亡之间的关系(2009-2018 年)。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12653-8.
9
Big data and predictive modelling for the opioid crisis: existing research and future potential.大数据和预测模型在阿片类药物危机中的应用:现有研究和未来潜力。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e397-e407. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00058-3.
10
"Know your epidemic, know your response": Epidemiological assessment of the substance use disorder crisis in the United States.“了解疫情,知晓应对”:美国物质使用障碍危机的流行病学评估
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251502. eCollection 2021.