• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能力型情商在预测情感决策中的作用。

The roles of ability emotional intelligence in predicting affective decision-making.

作者信息

Sambol Stjepan, Suleyman Emra, Ball Michelle

机构信息

Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 May 13;13(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02779-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02779-w
PMID:40361254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12070655/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision-making is integral to navigating everyday life, and understanding the cognitive and emotional factors influencing affective decision-making is crucial.

METHODS

In this study, 149 participants completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) to measure ability emotional intelligence, a N-back working memory task, and three affective decision-making tasks: the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), and Columbia Card Task (CCT).

RESULTS

The results revealed that understanding emotions, a domain of emotional intelligence, was a significant predictor of superior decision-making on both the IGT and CCT, even after controlling for working memory abilities. This finding suggests that the relationship between understanding emotions and affective decision-making is not merely a reflection of general cognitive abilities, but rather highlights the unique contribution of emotional understanding to strategic decision-making in emotionally charged contexts. However, emotional intelligence was not significantly associated with BART performance.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the importance of understanding emotions in strategic decision-making and open avenues for future research to investigate whether training ability emotional intelligence can improve affective decision-making tasks and yield meaningful benefits in real-world contexts.

摘要

背景

决策是日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,理解影响情感决策的认知和情感因素至关重要。

方法

在本研究中,149名参与者完成了梅耶-萨洛维-卡鲁索情商测试(MSCEIT)以测量能力情商、一项N-back工作记忆任务以及三项情感决策任务:爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)、气球模拟风险任务(BART)和哥伦比亚卡片任务(CCT)。

结果

结果显示,即使在控制了工作记忆能力之后,情商的一个领域——理解情绪,仍是IGT和CCT上卓越决策的重要预测指标。这一发现表明,理解情绪与情感决策之间的关系不仅仅是一般认知能力的反映,而是突出了情绪理解对充满情感的情境中的战略决策的独特贡献。然而,情商与BART表现没有显著关联。

结论

这些发现凸显了理解情绪在战略决策中的重要性,并为未来研究开辟了道路,以探讨训练能力情商是否可以改善情感决策任务,并在现实情境中产生有意义的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/80fec663eb40/40359_2025_2779_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/78680e61235c/40359_2025_2779_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/21569f021488/40359_2025_2779_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/6a13f26b65b2/40359_2025_2779_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/677f5db823e3/40359_2025_2779_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/80fec663eb40/40359_2025_2779_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/78680e61235c/40359_2025_2779_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/21569f021488/40359_2025_2779_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/6a13f26b65b2/40359_2025_2779_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/677f5db823e3/40359_2025_2779_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/12070655/80fec663eb40/40359_2025_2779_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The roles of ability emotional intelligence in predicting affective decision-making.能力型情商在预测情感决策中的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 13;13(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02779-w.
2
Increases in Emotional Intelligence After an Online Training Program Are Associated With Better Decision-Making on the Iowa Gambling Task.在线培训项目后情商的提高与爱荷华赌博任务中更好的决策相关。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Jun;122(3):853-879. doi: 10.1177/0033294118771705. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
The Impact of Executive Functions and Emotional Intelligence on Iowa Gambling Task Performance: Focus on Right Frontal Lobe Damage.执行功能和情商对爱荷华赌博任务表现的影响:聚焦于右额叶损伤
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Dec 1;32(8):1026-1036. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx065.
4
The assessment of risky decision making: a factor analysis of performance on the Iowa Gambling Task, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, and Columbia Card Task.风险决策评估:对爱荷华赌博任务、气球模拟风险任务和哥伦比亚卡片任务表现的因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):777-85. doi: 10.1037/a0038622. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
5
The role of cognitive versus emotional intelligence in Iowa Gambling Task performance: What's emotion got to do with it?认知能力与情商在爱荷华赌博任务表现中的作用:情绪与之有何关系?
Intelligence. 2014 May-June;44:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.008.
6
Traditional Chinese version of the Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT-TC): Its validation and application to schizophrenic individuals.中文繁体版迈耶-沙洛维-卡鲁索情绪智力测验(MSCEIT-TC):其验证及对精神分裂症个体的应用。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Sep 30;243:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.107. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions.在有情感刺激的情况下执行次要执行任务会干扰风险条件下的决策。
Cogn Process. 2014 May;15(2):113-26. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0584-y. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
8
Follow your gut? Emotional intelligence moderates the association between physiologically measured somatic markers and risk-taking.凭直觉行事?情绪智力调节生理测量的躯体标记物与冒险行为之间的关系。
Emotion. 2020 Apr;20(3):462-472. doi: 10.1037/emo0000561. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
9
Emotional intelligence: a theoretical framework for individual differences in affective forecasting.情绪智力:情感预测个体差异的理论框架。
Emotion. 2012 Aug;12(4):716-25. doi: 10.1037/a0026724. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
10
Emotional intelligence and acute pain: the mediating effect of negative affect.情绪智力与急性疼痛:负性情绪的中介作用。
J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological validity of common behavioral decision making tasks: evidence across two samples.常见行为决策任务的生态效度:来自两个样本的证据
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;46(3):187-206. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2337759. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2
Impulsivity and sensitivity to reward as mediating factors of the negative relationship between emotional intelligence and health-related risk-taking: evidence from a sample of university students.冲动性和对奖励的敏感性作为情商与健康相关风险行为之间负相关关系的中介因素:来自大学生样本的证据。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;11(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01417-7.
3
With Great Sensitivity Comes Great Management: How Emotional Hypersensitivity Can Be the Superpower of Emotional Intelligence.
高度敏感带来卓越管理:情绪超敏如何成为情商的超级力量。
J Intell. 2023 Oct 11;11(10):198. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100198.
4
Distinguishing between trait emotional intelligence and the five-factor model of personality: additive predictive validity of emotional intelligence for negative emotional states.区分特质情绪智力与人格五因素模型:情绪智力对负面情绪状态的附加预测效度。
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e08882. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08882. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Evidence on the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Risk Behavior: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review.情商与风险行为之间关系的证据:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 9;13:810012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810012. eCollection 2022.
6
A Description-Experience Framework of the Psychology of Risk.风险心理学的描述-体验框架。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 May;17(3):631-651. doi: 10.1177/17456916211026896. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
7
Can We "Brain-Train" Emotional Intelligence? A Narrative Review on the Features and Approaches Used in Ability EI Training Studies.我们能否“训练大脑”提升情商?关于能力情商训练研究中使用的特征和方法的叙述性综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;12:569749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569749. eCollection 2021.
8
Representative design in psychological assessment: A case study using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).心理评估中的代表性设计:使用气球模拟风险任务(BART)的案例研究。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Oct;150(10):2117-2136. doi: 10.1037/xge0001036. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
A Systematic Review of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in Alcohol Research.酒精研究中气球模拟风险任务(BART)的系统评价。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2022 Jan 8;57(1):85-103. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agab004.
10
Editorial: Trait Emotional Intelligence: Foundations, Assessment, and Education.社论:特质情绪智力:基础、评估与教育
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 16;11:608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00608. eCollection 2020.