Bouzraa Said, Agüera Estrella I, Avilés-Ramírez Carmen, Serrano Salud
Food Science and Technology Department, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Halal Institute Spain, EGCH S.L., 14001 Córdoba, Spain.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;15(9):1227. doi: 10.3390/ani15091227.
This study aimed to compare different cattle slaughter methods, with and without stunning, and their impact on the sensory attributes and textural properties of beef. A total of 45 meat samples were collected at the slaughterhouse. Fifteen samples were taken from the muscle (five per slaughter method), and thirty samples were taken from the muscle (ten per slaughter method). Sensory and instrumental analyses were conducted to assess odour, flavour, colour, water-holding capacity, and texture. The results indicated that beef from halal slaughter with reversible stunning exhibited lower scores for urine and milk odours, metallic flavour, and red (a*) and yellow (b*) indices, but only in the muscle. No significant differences were observed among the methods for other measured parameters. Although religious slaughter without stunning remains legally permitted, it is controversial from an animal welfare perspective. Further research is necessary to develop stunning methods that align with religious requirements while ensuring high meat quality.
本研究旨在比较不同的牛屠宰方法(有电击晕和无电击晕)及其对牛肉感官特性和质地特性的影响。在屠宰场共采集了45个肉样。从 肌肉中采集了15个样本(每种屠宰方法5个),从 肌肉中采集了30个样本(每种屠宰方法10个)。进行了感官和仪器分析以评估气味、风味、颜色、持水能力和质地。结果表明,采用可逆电击晕的清真屠宰牛肉在尿液和牛奶气味、金属味以及红色(a*)和黄色(b*)指数方面得分较低,但仅在 肌肉中如此。在其他测量参数方面,各方法之间未观察到显著差异。尽管无电击晕的宗教屠宰在法律上仍然允许,但从动物福利角度来看存在争议。有必要进一步开展研究,以开发出符合宗教要求同时确保高肉品质的电击晕方法。