Cochrane Jacqueline Dorothy, Dudek Nancy, Crawford Kelsey, Cowley Lindsay, LaDonna Kori A
Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bruyère Health, Ontario, Canada.
Can Med Educ J. 2025 May 1;16(2):6-16. doi: 10.36834/cmej.78570. eCollection 2025 May.
Current approaches to health advocate (HA) training leave many physicians feeling ill-equipped to advocate effectively. Likewise, faculty perceive the HA role as challenging to teach, role model, evaluate and assess. Progress on improving HA training is further stalled by debate over the role's importance and whether it should be considered intrinsic to medical practice. Recent graduates are well-positioned to comment on how these challenges affect HA training and preparation for practice. Therefore, our purpose was to explore the perspectives of new-in-practice physicians who are keen to be effective advocates.
Ten early-career physicians participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceived competence and motivation to engage in health advocacy. Constructivist grounded theory informed the iterative data collection and analysis process.
Participants wished they knew during training how much they would use advocacy in practice. While training imparted adequate patient-level advocacy skills, participants felt underprepared to enact system-level advocacy-which they conceptualized as a wide-range of activities including political advocacy. In turn, participants grappled with lack of preparation, waning motivation, feelings of futility, lack of value for advocacy and need for self-preservation. For these reasons, they questioned whether system-level advocacy should be expected of all physicians.
Although training may adequately prepare physicians for patient-level advocacy, system-level advocacy training remains insufficient. While patient-level advocacy is integral to good care, whether system-level advocacy should be a universal expectation deserves closer consideration. Perhaps system-level health advocacy may be better conceptualized as a specialized role requiring additional training. Regardless, physician advocates' efforts need to be valued for their contributions.
目前健康倡导者(HA)培训方法使许多医生觉得自己没有足够能力进行有效的倡导。同样,教员认为HA角色在教学、树立榜样、评估和评价方面具有挑战性。关于该角色的重要性以及它是否应被视为医疗实践的固有组成部分的争论,进一步阻碍了HA培训的改进。刚毕业的学生很适合评论这些挑战如何影响HA培训和实践准备。因此,我们的目的是探讨渴望成为有效倡导者的新执业医生的观点。
十位早期职业医生参与了半结构化访谈,探讨他们对参与健康倡导的感知能力和动机。建构主义扎根理论为迭代数据收集和分析过程提供了指导。
参与者希望在培训期间就知道他们在实践中会多频繁地运用倡导。虽然培训传授了足够的患者层面的倡导技能,但参与者觉得在进行系统层面的倡导时准备不足——他们将系统层面的倡导概念化为包括政治倡导在内的广泛活动。相应地,参与者努力应对准备不足、动力减弱、徒劳感、对倡导缺乏重视以及自我保护需求等问题。出于这些原因,他们质疑是否应该期望所有医生都进行系统层面的倡导。
尽管培训可能使医生为患者层面的倡导做好充分准备,但系统层面的倡导培训仍然不足。虽然患者层面的倡导是优质护理不可或缺的一部分,但系统层面的倡导是否应成为普遍期望值得更深入的考虑。或许系统层面的健康倡导可以更好地被概念化为一个需要额外培训的专门角色。无论如何,医生倡导者的努力因其贡献而需要得到重视。