Abdelwahab Siddig Ibrahim, Taha Manal Mohamed Elhassan, Farasani Abdullah, Abdullah Saleh M, Moshi Jobran M, Alshahrani Abrar Fahad, Khamjan Nizar A, Khired Zenat A, Assiri Ahmad, Alqassmi Ali Mohammed, Alhusayni Amal Mayudh, Ibrahim Ibrahim Abdel Aziz, Alshahrani Saeed, Hassan Waseem
Medical Research Center, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2025 May 13;56(5):101960. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101960.
Previous bibliometric studies of radiography journals have been limited in scope, covering selective time periods such as 1997-2011, 2013-2022, or 2004-2011, and analyzing relatively small datasets ranging from 706 to 1,830 articles with a few limitations. The present study examined 3,875 papers published in Radiography, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, and Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences since their inclusion in the Scopus database. Quantitative bibliometric indicators, including publication counts, citation performance, and mean citations per article/year, were computed using the Bibliometrix package in R Studio. Co-authorship and institutional collaboration networks were visualized using VOSviewer. Keyword co-occurrence analysis was also conducted to identify dominant research areas and trace their evolution over time. Findings revealed a substantial rise in research output, increasing from 15 publications in 1995 to 456 in 2024. Citation impact peaked in 2017, with a gradual decline in subsequent years. The most prolific authors included Hogg P., Bolderston A., and Reed W., while the University of Salford, University of Toronto, and University of Sydney emerged as the leading institutions across the three journals. The United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia were dominant contributors, with a notable rise in participation from African and Asian countries. Funding was primarily supported by national health agencies, cancer-focused organizations, and academic institutions. Keyword analysis revealed nine major thematic clusters, including diagnostic imaging technologies, oncology, clinical practice, education, patient-centered care, and public health. Importantly, eight highly cited papers (≥100 citations) were identified, many of which contributed significantly to the professionalization of radiography, expanded the role of radiographers in diagnostic reporting, and integrated emerging technologies such as AI and digital imaging-marking key milestones in the field's development. In summary, this study presents the large-scale, journal-inclusive bibliometric profile of radiography research. It offers new insights into global contributions, and collaboration patterns, thus serving as a valuable foundation for shaping future research strategies.
以往对放射学期刊的文献计量学研究范围有限,涵盖如1997 - 2011年、2013 - 2022年或2004 - 2011年等特定时间段,且分析的数据集相对较小,文章数量在706至1830篇之间,还存在一些局限性。本研究考察了自被Scopus数据库收录以来,发表在《放射学》《医学影像与放射科学杂志》以及《医学放射科学杂志》上的3875篇论文。使用R Studio中的Bibliometrix软件包计算了包括发表数量、被引表现以及每篇文章每年平均被引次数等定量文献计量指标。使用VOSviewer可视化了共同作者和机构合作网络。还进行了关键词共现分析,以确定主要研究领域并追踪其随时间的演变。研究结果显示研究产出大幅增长,从1995年的15篇发表文章增至2024年的456篇。被引影响力在2017年达到峰值,随后逐年逐渐下降。最多产的作者包括霍格·P.、博尔德斯顿·A.和里德·W.,而索尔福德大学、多伦多大学和悉尼大学是这三本期刊中领先的机构。英国、加拿大和澳大利亚是主要贡献国,非洲和亚洲国家的参与度显著上升。资金主要由国家卫生机构、专注于癌症的组织和学术机构提供支持。关键词分析揭示了九个主要主题集群,包括诊断成像技术、肿瘤学、临床实践、教育、以患者为中心的护理和公共卫生。重要的是,确定了八篇高被引论文(≥100次引用),其中许多论文对放射学的专业化做出了重大贡献,扩大了放射技师在诊断报告中的作用,并整合了人工智能和数字成像等新兴技术——标志着该领域发展的关键里程碑。总之,本研究呈现了放射学研究大规模、涵盖多本期刊的文献计量概况。它为全球贡献和合作模式提供了新见解,从而为制定未来研究策略奠定了宝贵基础。