Performing robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with a narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma presents further challenges.

BACKGROUND

Several studies have compared robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with conventional minimally invasive surgery (C-MIE). However, the anatomical factors that may make certain patients more suitable for RAMIE remains unclear. This study compared the surgical outcomes of RAMIE with those of C-MIE in patients with narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and December 2023, 260 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent MIE (C-MIE or RAMIE) at Kobe University Hospital were included in the study. We developed a new index to assess the narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus at the tracheal bifurcation level using computed tomography imaging. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Patients with a narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus had a higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy and fewer lymph nodes dissections than other patients (p = 0.026 and p = 0.051, respectively). In the entire cohort, the operative time in the RAMIE group was longer than that in the C-MIE group (< 0.0001). No significant differences in other variables, including RLN palsy, were observed between the two groups. Among patients with narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus, RAMIE was associated with longer operative time and fewer lymph nodes dissected from the left and right sides of the upper mediastinum compared to C-MIE (p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.0001, respectively). Regarding the RLN palsy, there was no significant difference (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

There are challenges in performing RAMIE in patients with a narrow mediastinal and left-shifted esophagus. Therefore, establishing an effective procedure for these patients is important.