Obi Chukwunonso Francis, Aneru Ganiyu E, Okpala Michael I, Oyiga Tobias C, Agidigide Joseph, Ezeokonkwo Romanus C, Ezeh Ikenna O, Idika Idika K, Onah Denchris N
Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 May 15;57(4):220. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04471-y.
Coccidiosis is a major economic burden in poultry farming worldwide. In Nigeria, herbal anticoccidials are widely used, yet their efficacy compared to orthodox drugs remains unclear. This study evaluates their comparative effects in broilers experimentally infected with mixed Eimeria species. 70 five-week-old broiler birds were employed in this study. The infective dose of the field strain of mixed Eimeria species was determined following standard procedures. Forty-two birds were randomly assigned to six groups (seven birds per group) to compare the anticoccidial effects of herbal and orthodox drugs. Groups A-E were infected with 10 sporulated mixed Eimeria tenella and E. maxima oocysts while group F was the uninfected control. Groups A-D were treated with Cocci00® (branded herbal drug), unbranded herbal preparation (UHP), Amprolium, and Diclazuril respectively, following the manufacturer's recommended dosage. Group E remained untreated. Clinical signs, body weight changes, oocyst output, feed conversion ratio (FCR), lesion score, survivability/mortality and haematological parameters of the birds were assessed. Among treated groups, birds in the UHP group had significantly higher (p < 0.05) oocyst counts, mortality rates, and FCR, along with lower (p < 0.05) weight gain. Conversely, groups A, C, and D demonstrated comparable mortality rates, survival times, oocyst counts, FCR and lesion scores. However, these values were slightly better in the Diclazuril-treated group D birds. In conclusion, both Cocci00® (branded herbal) and orthodox drugs showed similar anticoccidial effects, but Diclazuril was the most effective. The UHP had the lowest efficacy.
球虫病是全球家禽养殖中的一项主要经济负担。在尼日利亚,草药抗球虫剂被广泛使用,但其与传统药物相比的疗效仍不明确。本研究评估了它们对实验感染混合艾美耳球虫种类的肉鸡的比较效果。本研究使用了70只五周龄的肉鸡。按照标准程序确定混合艾美耳球虫种类田间菌株的感染剂量。42只鸡被随机分为六组(每组7只),以比较草药和传统药物的抗球虫效果。A-E组感染10个孢子化的混合柔嫩艾美耳球虫和巨型艾美耳球虫卵囊,而F组为未感染对照。按照制造商推荐的剂量,A-D组分别用Cocci00®(品牌草药药物)、无品牌草药制剂(UHP)、氨丙啉和地克珠利进行治疗。E组未接受治疗。评估了鸡的临床症状、体重变化、卵囊产量、饲料转化率(FCR)、病变评分、存活率/死亡率和血液学参数。在治疗组中,UHP组的鸡卵囊计数、死亡率和FCR显著更高(p<0.05),体重增加更低(p<0.05)。相反,A、C和D组的死亡率、存活时间、卵囊计数、FCR和病变评分相当。然而,地克珠利治疗的D组鸡的这些值略好。总之,Cocci00®(品牌草药)和传统药物均显示出相似的抗球虫效果,但地克珠利最有效。UHP的疗效最低。