Albert R K, Muramoto A, Caldwell J, Koepsell T, Butler J
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Sep;132(3):623-7. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.132.3.623.
During exercise, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increase their pulmonary arterial wedge (Ppaw) and left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressures more than normal control subjects. The increase in pressure is commonly attributed to an increase in intrathoracic pressure (Pit). However, mean esophageal pressure (Pes) does not increase with supine exercise in patients with COPD. Because changes in Pes may not represent changes in Pit when recorded in the supine position, we measured Ppaw and Pes during upright exercise in 8 patients with severe air-flow limitation (mean +/- SD) FEV1, 0.88 +/- 0.27 L secondary to COPD and no history or electrocardiographic abnormalities suggesting a previous myocardial infarct, history of angina, evidence of systemic hypertension, or use of cardiac medications. In addition, all patients completed a progressive exercise test to exhaustion without angina or ST segment changes, and all had normal LV function at rest assessed by equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. The Ppaw increased a mean of 7.2 +/- 4.3 mmHg, whereas Pes increased a mean of only 1.3 +/- 1.6 mmHg. By multiple linear regression analysis, Ppaw was significantly associated with the work level performed (p less than 0.01), but had no significant association with Pes (p greater than 0.1). The change in Ppaw could not be attributed to changes in Pes. If changes in Pes during upright exercise are representative of changes in Pit or juxtacardiac pressure, a rise in Pit does not explain the exercise-induced increase in Ppaw and LV end-diastolic pressure that occurs in patients with COPD.
在运动过程中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺动脉楔压(Ppaw)和左心室(LV)舒张末期压力的升高幅度超过正常对照受试者。压力升高通常归因于胸内压(Pit)升高。然而,COPD患者仰卧位运动时平均食管压力(Pes)并未升高。由于仰卧位记录时Pes的变化可能无法代表Pit的变化,我们对8例严重气流受限(平均±标准差)的患者进行了直立位运动时Ppaw和Pes的测量,这些患者继发于COPD的第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为0.88±0.27L,无既往心肌梗死病史或心电图异常提示、心绞痛病史、系统性高血压证据或使用心脏药物。此外,所有患者均完成了递增运动试验直至力竭,未出现心绞痛或ST段改变,且通过平衡放射性核素心室造影评估,所有患者静息时左心室功能均正常。Ppaw平均升高7.2±4.3mmHg,而Pes仅平均升高1.3±1.6mmHg。通过多元线性回归分析,Ppaw与所执行的工作水平显著相关(p<0.01),但与Pes无显著相关性(p>0.1)。Ppaw的变化不能归因于Pes的变化。如果直立位运动时Pes的变化代表Pit或心旁压力的变化,那么Pit升高并不能解释COPD患者运动诱发的Ppaw和左心室舒张末期压力升高。