Ries A L, Farrow J T, Clausen J L
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Sep;132(3):685-9. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.132.3.685.
The accuracy of 2 ear oximeters (Hewlett-Packard 47201A and Biox IIA) was evaluated at rest and during exercise in 116 pulmonary patients. Ear oximetry measurements were compared with arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measured from simultaneous arterial blood samples. When used according to the manufacturer's instructions for stabilization during exercise testing, both oximeters demonstrated comparable accuracy in estimating arterial blood SaO2 both at rest and during exercise in these patients (95% confidence limits, 2 SEE = +/- 4 to 5%). The oximeters were more accurate in measuring a change in SaO2 from a previous reading (95% confidence limits, 2 SEE = +/- 2.5 to 3.5%). COHgb levels greater than 4% and dark skin pigmentation appeared to decrease the accuracy of ear oximetry measurements. Within the limitations of accuracy, both ear oximeters may be useful for clinical exercise testing in pulmonary patients.
在116例肺部疾病患者中,对两款耳部血氧仪(惠普47201A和Biox IIA)在静息状态和运动期间的准确性进行了评估。将耳部血氧测定结果与同时采集的动脉血样本所测得的动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)进行比较。当按照制造商在运动测试期间稳定化的说明使用时,在这些患者中,两款血氧仪在静息状态和运动期间估计动脉血SaO2方面均显示出相当的准确性(95%置信区间,2标准误=±4%至5%)。血氧仪在测量相对于先前读数的SaO2变化时更准确(95%置信区间,2标准误=±2.5%至3.5%)。碳氧血红蛋白(COHgb)水平大于4%和深色皮肤色素沉着似乎会降低耳部血氧测定的准确性。在准确性的限制范围内,两款耳部血氧仪可能对肺部疾病患者的临床运动测试有用。