Duan Jilong, Chen Xia, Fan Di, Jiang Haikun, Zhang Xue, Zhang Wenyue, Liu Zhiping, Lu Hongyan
Department of Nursing, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Department of Nursing, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, No. 804 Shengli Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan, 750003, China, 86 0951-6744622.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 May 16;13:e57645. doi: 10.2196/57645.
Electronic inhaler monitoring devices (EIMDs) can enhance medication adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, yet patient perceptions and experiences with these devices vary widely. A systematic qualitative synthesis is required to comprehensively understand patient perspectives on EIMDs, to lay the foundation for developing strategies to improve patient compliance.
This study aims to systematically evaluate qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with COPD and asthma using EIMDs, providing insights to support their clinical application and improve patient engagement.
This review synthesized qualitative data from reports found through a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo from January 1983 to July 2024. The reports assessed patient experiences with EIMDs for COPD and asthma. The quality of the included reports was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program criteria developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.
A total of 7 reports were included, encompassing data from 44 patients with COPD and 146 with asthma. Findings were organized into 9 sub-themes and 3 themes: positive experiences with EIMDs (usability and easy acceptance, enhanced self-management); stresses and challenges of using these devices (negative emotional stress, device trust issues, social difficulties, economic burdens, and technical challenges); and patient expectations from these devices (expectations related to device construction and function and external support).
Patients have positive experiences using electronic monitoring devices for inhalation devices but also face various social, psychological, and technical challenges. Health care workers should consider patient experiences with EIMDs to tailor these devices to patient needs, ultimately enhancing device acceptance and adherence. Further research should focus on increasing EIMDs convenience and usability for patients with COPD and asthma.
电子吸入器监测设备(EIMD)可提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘患者的用药依从性,但患者对这些设备的认知和体验差异很大。需要进行系统的定性综合分析,以全面了解患者对EIMD的看法,为制定提高患者依从性的策略奠定基础。
本研究旨在系统评价关于COPD和哮喘患者使用EIMD的经验的定性研究,为支持其临床应用和提高患者参与度提供见解。
本综述综合了通过系统检索1983年1月至2024年7月期间的PubMed、科学网、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和PsycInfo所找到的报告中的定性数据。这些报告评估了COPD和哮喘患者使用EIMD的经验。使用英国牛津大学循证医学中心制定的批判性评估技能计划标准对纳入报告的质量进行评估。
共纳入7份报告,涵盖44名COPD患者和146名哮喘患者的数据。研究结果分为9个子主题和3个主题:EIMD的积极体验(易用性和易于接受、增强自我管理);使用这些设备的压力和挑战(负面情绪压力、设备信任问题、社交困难、经济负担和技术挑战);以及患者对这些设备的期望(与设备构造和功能以及外部支持相关的期望)。
患者在使用吸入设备的电子监测设备时有积极体验,但也面临各种社会、心理和技术挑战。医护人员应考虑患者使用EIMD的经验,使这些设备符合患者需求,最终提高设备的接受度和依从性。进一步的研究应侧重于提高EIMD对COPD和哮喘患者的便利性和易用性。