• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对诊断成像服务的偏好:是否去中心化?

Patient preferences for diagnostic imaging services: Decentralize or not?

作者信息

van den Broek-Altenburg Eline M, Benson Jamie S, Atherly Adam J, DeStigter Kristen K

机构信息

Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0301404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301404. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301404
PMID:40378352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084043/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify patient preferences for outpatient diagnostic imaging services and analyze how patients make trade-offs between attributes of these services using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). We used a DCE with 14 choice questions asking which imaging locations patients would prefer. We used latent class analysis to analyze preference heterogeneity between different patient groups and to estimate the relative value they assign to different attributes of imaging services. Our analysis showed that the "Experienced Patients" subgroup generally value diagnostic imaging services in both acute and chronic situations and had a strong preference for hospital outpatient radiology departments (HORD) that would provide services at lower costs, where their images would be interpreted by a specialty radiologist, the clinic would be recommended by their PCP, online scheduling would be available, service rating were higher, and travel and wait times would be shorter. New Patients significantly valued the service rating of the (HORD and online scheduling. HORDs can be more competitive by providing services that live up to expectations better than available retail radiology clinics (RRCs). Most RRCs do not currently offer online scheduling so ease of use may also steer patients towards HORDs. HORDs have the advantage of being linked to the main medical center which has the reputation of having clinical expertise and more sophisticated technology. We conclude that there is room for medical centers to build HORDs that provide an appealing and competitive alternative to current RRC.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定患者对门诊诊断成像服务的偏好,并使用离散选择实验(DCE)分析患者如何在这些服务的属性之间进行权衡。我们使用了一个包含14个选择问题的DCE,询问患者更喜欢哪些成像地点。我们使用潜在类别分析来分析不同患者群体之间的偏好异质性,并估计他们赋予成像服务不同属性的相对价值。我们的分析表明,“有经验的患者”亚组通常重视急性和慢性情况下的诊断成像服务,并且强烈偏好能够以较低成本提供服务、由专科放射科医生解读其影像、由其初级保健医生推荐诊所、可提供在线预约、服务评级较高且出行和等待时间较短的医院门诊放射科(HORD)。新患者显著重视HORD的服务评级和在线预约。通过提供比现有零售放射科诊所(RRC)更符合期望的服务,HORD可以更具竞争力。大多数RRC目前不提供在线预约,因此易用性也可能使患者倾向于选择HORD。HORD的优势在于与主要医疗中心相关联,该中心享有临床专业知识和更先进技术的声誉。我们得出结论,医疗中心有空间建立HORD,为当前的RRC提供有吸引力且具竞争力的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a51/12084043/4b10f8b52c74/pone.0301404.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a51/12084043/f1f4d513334d/pone.0301404.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a51/12084043/4b10f8b52c74/pone.0301404.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a51/12084043/f1f4d513334d/pone.0301404.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a51/12084043/4b10f8b52c74/pone.0301404.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for diagnostic imaging services: Decentralize or not?患者对诊断成像服务的偏好:是否去中心化?
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0301404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301404. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.患者对社区药店哮喘服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):961-76. doi: 10.2165/11594350-000000000-00000.
3
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.
4
Musculoskeletal patients' preferences for care from physiotherapists or support workers: a discrete choice experiment.肌骨系统患者对理疗师或支持工作人员提供的治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11585-w.
5
Exploring determinants of health provider choice and heterogeneity in preference among outpatients in Beijing: a labelled discrete choice experiment.探讨北京门诊患者选择卫生服务提供者的决定因素和偏好异质性:一项标记离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e023363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023363.
6
Preferences for breast cancer screening: Results of a discrete choice experiment.乳腺癌筛查偏好:一项离散选择实验的结果
Public Health. 2025 Mar;240:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.010. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
7
Preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery via online pharmacy among potential users in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment.肯尼亚潜在用户对通过在线药店提供暴露前预防措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Oct;27(10):e26356. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26356.
8
Patient Preferences for Strategies to Improve Tuberculosis Diagnostic Services in Zambia.赞比亚患者对改善结核病诊断服务策略的偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229091. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29091.
9
Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.任务转移、电子健康与共同决策——成年人群对门诊初级医疗保健发展的偏好异质性
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70060. doi: 10.1111/hex.70060.
10
Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment.对集中式紧急医疗服务的偏好:离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 5;9(11):e030966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966.

本文引用的文献

1
Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.抄近道:离散选择实验中的简化启发式方法。
Patient. 2023 Jul;16(4):301-315. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
The effect of unobserved preferences and race on vaccination hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccines: implications for health disparities.未观察到的偏好和种族对 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫的影响:对健康差异的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9-a Suppl):S4-S13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9-a.s4.
3
Strategies for the Identification and Prevention of Survey Fraud: Data Analysis of a Web-Based Survey.
识别与预防调查欺诈的策略:基于网络调查的数据分析
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Jul 16;7(3):e30730. doi: 10.2196/30730.
4
Body MRI Subspecialty Reinterpretations at a Tertiary Care Center: Discrepancy Rates and Error Types.三级医疗中心的身体磁共振成像亚专业重新解读:差异率和错误类型
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Dec;215(6):1384-1388. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22797. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions.运用离散选择实验来衡量对难以观察的选择属性的偏好,以为卫生政策决策提供信息。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jun 11;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x.
6
Trends in Use of Medical Imaging in US Health Care Systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016.2000-2016 年美国医疗保健系统和加拿大安大略省医疗成像使用趋势。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):843-856. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11456.
7
The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments.离散选择实验数据的内部有效性:一种用于定量评估的测试工具。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.876. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments.属性水平重叠(和颜色编码)可以降低任务复杂性,提高选择一致性,并降低离散选择实验中的辍学率。
Health Econ. 2019 Mar;28(3):350-363. doi: 10.1002/hec.3846. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
9
Waiting for Radiology Test Results: Patient Expectations and Emotional Disutility.等待放射科检查结果:患者的期望和情绪不效用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?提高健康领域离散选择实验的质量:我们如何评估有效性和可靠性?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23.