Human and Social Sciences Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon.
Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif.
ESMO Open. 2023 Aug;8(4):101610. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101610. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
Investigation of the disparities in the access to experimental treatment in early-phase clinical trials is lacking. The objective of the EGALICAN-2 study was to identify the factors underpinning such inequalities.
A national prospective survey was conducted in 11 early-phase clinical trial centers (CLIP) certified by the French National Cancer Institute. Sociodemographic, socioeconomic and medical data were collected. Univariate logistic regression models were carried out to estimate odds ratios and 90% confidence intervals associated with the effect of each study variable. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to explore the independent factors associated with the administration of the experimental treatment (C1D1). A post hoc analysis was carried out excluding female cancer patients.
Between 2015 and 2016, 1355 patients referred from 11 CLIP centers in France were included in the study. Eight hundred and forty-eight patients received C1D1 (73%) and 320 patients (27%) were screening failure. Median age was 58 years (range 17-97 years) and 667 patients (54%) were female. Most patients had a metastatic disease (n = 751, 87%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the significant independent factors associated with C1D1 were male sex, initial care received in a hospital with an early-phase unit and living in wealthy metropolitan areas (P values <0.05). In the post hoc analysis, the sex factor was no longer significant [odds ratio = 1.21 (95% confidence interval 0.86-1.70), P value = 0.271].
This study investigated the factors producing social inequalities in the context of early-phase clinical trials in oncology. Our research highlights factors of sex, care pathway and geographic location. Gynecological cancer was found to impact C1D1 significantly, unlike breast cancer. The results of this study should contribute to improve patient access to early-phase clinical trials.
早期临床试验中实验性治疗可及性的差异研究尚缺乏。EGALICAN-2 研究的目的是确定导致这些不平等的因素。
在法国国家癌症研究所认证的 11 个早期临床试验中心(CLIP)进行了一项全国前瞻性调查。收集了社会人口统计学、社会经济学和医学数据。采用单变量逻辑回归模型估计与每项研究变量相关的优势比和 90%置信区间。建立多变量逻辑回归模型以探索与给予实验性治疗(C1D1)相关的独立因素。进行了一项事后分析,排除了女性癌症患者。
2015 年至 2016 年,纳入了来自法国 11 个 CLIP 中心的 1355 名患者。848 名患者接受了 C1D1(73%),320 名患者(27%)为筛选失败。中位年龄为 58 岁(范围 17-97 岁),667 名患者(54%)为女性。大多数患者患有转移性疾病(n=751,87%)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,与 C1D1 显著相关的独立因素是男性、在有早期治疗单位的医院接受初始治疗和居住在富裕的大都市区(P 值<0.05)。在事后分析中,性别因素不再显著[优势比=1.21(95%置信区间 0.86-1.70),P 值=0.271]。
本研究调查了在肿瘤学早期临床试验中导致社会不平等的因素。我们的研究强调了性别、治疗途径和地理位置的因素。与乳腺癌不同,妇科癌症显著影响了 C1D1。本研究的结果应有助于改善患者参与早期临床试验的机会。