Ferreira Tiradentes Ruiz Lailla Ketly, da Silva Melo Malaquias Tatiana, Bezerra da Silva Junior Geraldo, Kowal Olm Cunha Isabel Cristina, Aparecida Pimenta Rosangela, Aroni Dadalt Patrícia, do Carmo Fernandez Lourenço Haddad Maria
Nurse, Ph.D., State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Nurse, Ph.D., State University of Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), Guarapuava, Paraná, Brazil.
Invest Educ Enferm. 2025 Apr;43(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v43n1e11.
To identify the evidence in the literature regarding the care provided to the population by humanoid robots.
A scoping review based on the guidelines established by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed. The review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework under the number osf.io/6ur93. The search was conducted in November 2023 in the following databases: PubMed®, EMBASE®, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus®, and CINAHL, as well as in the gray literature, including Google Scholar and the Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), using the search strategy: "humanoid robot*" AND "patient*".
A total of 27 articles were analyzed. Most of the identified studies were conducted in hospital settings (n=13), with a primary focus on adults (n=10) and children (n=8). The countries with the highest number of publications were Japan (n=6), Canada (n=5), and France (n=4). Three areas of care were identified: social interaction (n=17), physical rehabilitation (n=7), and dissemination of health information (n=3). Additionally, only four studies involved collaboration between humanoid robots and healthcare providers.
Despite the increasing use of humanoid robots in healthcare, it remains essential to enhance their integration with professionals in the field. Social interaction highlighted the need to improve patient care, underscoring the importance of aligning the capabilities of these robots with the expertise of healthcare providers. Accordingly, future research should focus on developing strategies that ensure this technology not only assists but also optimizes the quality of care and strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration.
确定文献中关于人形机器人为人群提供护理的证据。
根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所制定的指南进行范围综述。遵循范围综述的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)清单。综述方案已在开放科学框架下注册,编号为osf.io/6ur93。2023年11月在以下数据库中进行检索:PubMed®、EMBASE®、LILACS、Web of Science、Scopus®和CINAHL,以及灰色文献,包括谷歌学术和高等教育人员素质提升协调委员会(CAPES)的学位论文目录,检索策略为:“人形机器人*”和“患者*”。
共分析了27篇文章。大多数已确定的研究是在医院环境中进行的(n = 13),主要关注成年人(n = 10)和儿童(n = 8)。发表文章数量最多的国家是日本(n = 6)、加拿大(n = 5)和法国(n = 4)。确定了三个护理领域:社交互动(n = 17)、身体康复(n = 7)和健康信息传播(n = 3)。此外,只有四项研究涉及人形机器人与医疗保健提供者之间的合作。
尽管人形机器人在医疗保健中的使用日益增加,但加强它们与该领域专业人员的整合仍然至关重要。社交互动凸显了改善患者护理的必要性,强调了使这些机器人的能力与医疗保健提供者的专业知识相一致的重要性。因此,未来的研究应侧重于制定策略,以确保这项技术不仅能提供帮助,还能优化护理质量并加强跨学科合作。