• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能物理机器人在医疗保健中的应用:系统文献综述。

Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Department of Information and Knowledge Management, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 18;25:e39786. doi: 10.2196/39786.

DOI:10.2196/39786
PMID:36652280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9892988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intelligent physical robots based on artificial intelligence have been argued to bring about dramatic changes in health care services. Previous research has examined the use of intelligent physical robots in the health care context from different perspectives; however, an overview of the antecedents and consequences of intelligent physical robot use in health care is lacking in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

In this paper, we aimed to provide an overview of the antecedents and consequences of intelligent physical robot use in health care and to propose potential agendas for future research through a systematic literature review.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review on intelligent physical robots in the health care field following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Literature searches were conducted in 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL) in May 2021, focusing on studies using intelligent physical robots for health care purposes. Subsequently, the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We performed an exploratory content analysis and synthesized the findings extracted from the included articles.

RESULTS

A total of 94 research articles were included in the review. Intelligent physical robots, including mechanoid, humanoid, android, and animalistic robots, have been used in hospitals, nursing homes, mental health care centers, laboratories, and patients' homes by both end customers and health care professionals. The antecedents for intelligent physical robot use are categorized into individual-, organization-, and robot-related factors. Intelligent physical robot use in the health care context leads to both non-health-related consequences (emotional outcomes, attitude and evaluation outcomes, and behavioral outcomes) and consequences for (physical, mental, and social) health promotion for individual users. Accordingly, an integrative framework was proposed to obtain an overview of the antecedents and consequences of intelligent physical robot use in the health care context.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to the literature by summarizing current knowledge in the field of intelligent physical robot use in health care, by identifying the antecedents and the consequences of intelligent physical robot use, and by proposing potential future research agendas in the specific area based on the research findings in the literature and the identified knowledge gaps.

摘要

背景

基于人工智能的智能物理机器人被认为将给医疗保健服务带来巨大变革。以往的研究从不同角度考察了智能物理机器人在医疗保健环境中的应用,但文献中缺乏对医疗保健中智能物理机器人使用的前因后果的概述。

目的

本文旨在通过系统文献回顾,概述医疗保健中智能物理机器人使用的前因后果,并根据文献中的研究结果和已确定的知识空白,提出该领域未来潜在的研究议程。

方法

我们按照 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南对医疗保健领域的智能物理机器人进行了系统文献回顾。2021 年 5 月,我们在 5 个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO、Embase 和 CINAHL)中进行了文献检索,重点是使用智能物理机器人进行医疗保健目的的研究。随后,使用混合方法评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。我们进行了探索性内容分析,并综合了从纳入文章中提取的发现。

结果

共有 94 篇研究文章纳入综述。智能物理机器人,包括机械机器人、人形机器人、android 机器人和动物机器人,已被终端用户和医疗保健专业人员在医院、养老院、心理健康护理中心、实验室和患者家中使用。智能物理机器人使用的前因可分为个体、组织和机器人相关因素。在医疗保健环境中使用智能物理机器人会导致非健康相关的后果(情绪结果、态度和评价结果以及行为结果),以及对个体用户的(身体、心理和社会)健康促进的后果。因此,提出了一个综合框架,以概述医疗保健中智能物理机器人使用的前因后果。

结论

本研究通过总结医疗保健中智能物理机器人使用的当前知识,通过确定智能物理机器人使用的前因后果,并根据文献中的研究结果和已确定的知识空白,在该特定领域提出潜在的未来研究议程,为文献做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/9892988/41c8bbc23e34/jmir_v25i1e39786_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/9892988/605b6f787e62/jmir_v25i1e39786_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/9892988/41c8bbc23e34/jmir_v25i1e39786_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/9892988/605b6f787e62/jmir_v25i1e39786_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/9892988/41c8bbc23e34/jmir_v25i1e39786_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review.智能物理机器人在医疗保健中的应用:系统文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 18;25:e39786. doi: 10.2196/39786.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
5
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing the Implementation and Adoption of Digital Nursing Technologies: Systematic Umbrella Review.影响数字护理技术实施与应用的因素:系统综合评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 31;27:e64616. doi: 10.2196/64616.
2
Factors Associated With the Level of Trust in Health Information Robots Among the General Population From a Socioecological Model Perspective: Network Analysis.从社会生态模型视角看普通人群中与健康信息机器人信任水平相关的因素:网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 13;27:e68299. doi: 10.2196/68299.
3
Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing and human-computer interaction in healthcare robots for older people: An integrative review.面向老年人的医疗保健机器人中的护理与人机交互:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Mar 4;4:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100072. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Robotics and artificial intelligence in healthcare during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19大流行期间医疗保健领域的机器人技术与人工智能:一项系统综述
Rob Auton Syst. 2021 Dec;146:103902. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2021.103902. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction.
生成式人工智能时代的医疗保健社交机器人:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 14;14:e63017. doi: 10.2196/63017.
4
Evaluation of nurses' perspectives on the design and use of assistant nurse robots in obstetrics and neonatal care: a mixed-method study.护士对产科和新生儿护理中辅助护士机器人设计与使用的观点评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 1;24(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03025-9.
5
User-Centered Prototype Design of a Health Care Robot for Treating Type 2 Diabetes in the Community Pharmacy: Development and Usability Study.社区药房中用于治疗2型糖尿病的医疗机器人的以用户为中心的原型设计:开发与可用性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 18;12:e48226. doi: 10.2196/48226.
6
Sustainable Implementation of Digital Assistive Technologies in Health Care Through a Simplified Interaction and Control Platform: Protocol for a Cocreative Feasibility Study.通过简化交互与控制平台在医疗保健中可持续实施数字辅助技术:共创可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 18;14:e63089. doi: 10.2196/63089.
7
[Smart assistants: service robots in action].[智能助手:运行中的服务机器人]
Urologie. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02537-1.
8
What about spiritual needs? Care robotics and spiritual care.精神需求呢?护理机器人与精神关怀。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Dec 17;11:1455133. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1455133. eCollection 2024.
9
Cocreative Development of Robotic Interaction Systems for Health Care: Scoping Review.医疗机器人交互系统的共创开发:范围综述。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 12;11:e58046. doi: 10.2196/58046.
10
Expectations of new technologies in nursing care among hospital patients in Germany - an interview study.德国住院患者对护理新技术的期望——一项访谈研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1227852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227852. eCollection 2023.
一项关于拟人化在人机交互中有效性的荟萃分析。
Sci Robot. 2021 Sep 8;6(58):eabj5425. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj5425.
4
Lio-A Personal Robot Assistant for Human-Robot Interaction and Care Applications.Lio-A:一款用于人机交互与护理应用的个人机器人助手。
IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020 Jul 7;5(4):5339-5346. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3007462. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Artificial Intelligence-Based Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons for Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Review.基于人工智能的上肢康复可穿戴机器人外骨骼:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 18;21(6):2146. doi: 10.3390/s21062146.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
7
How Robots Help Nurses Focus on Professional Task Engagement and Reduce Nurses' Turnover Intention.机器人如何帮助护士专注于专业任务投入并降低护士离职意愿。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 Mar;53(2):237-245. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12629. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Designing Ethical Social Robots-A Longitudinal Field Study With Older Adults.设计符合伦理的社交机器人——一项针对老年人的纵向实地研究。
Front Robot AI. 2020 Jan 24;7:1. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00001. eCollection 2020.
9
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for operable non-small cell lung cancer.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术及电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗可切除非小细胞肺癌的成本效益评估
Lung Cancer. 2021 Mar;153:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.12.033. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
10
The effect of a social robot intervention on sleep and motor activity of people living with dementia and chronic pain: A pilot randomized controlled trial.社交机器人干预对患有痴呆症和慢性疼痛的人群的睡眠和运动活动的影响:一项初步随机对照试验。
Maturitas. 2021 Feb;144:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 24.