von dem Knesebeck Olaf, Dingoyan Demet, Makowski Anna, Klein Jens
Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 May 17;24(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02512-4.
While the number of studies investigating the magnitude, reasons, and possible consequences of perceived discrimination in health care is growing, many of these studies do not differentiate between structural and interpersonal discrimination in health care. The latter rests upon stereotypes and takes place in direct interactions between the health care provider and the patient. In this study, we explore the frequency and main reasons of different interpersonal discrimination experiences in inpatient and outpatient care in Germany and associations of discrimination with delayed and forgone care.
Analyses were based on an online survey among the adult population in Germany (N = 3,246). A modified version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale was used to assess interpersonal discrimination experiences in inpatient and outpatient care. For each of the experiences, the main reason(s) for discrimination was ascertained. Indicators of delayed and forgone care referred to necessary doctor visits in the last 12 months.
Analyses revealed that two thirds (66%) of the respondents reported at least one of five experiences in inpatient or outpatient care. The experience that people in health care acted as if they were better than oneself was reported most frequently (41.3% in outpatient care and 27.7% in inpatient care). All discrimination experiences were significantly more frequent in outpatient care than in inpatient care. Age and health insurance were the most frequently reported reasons for the discrimination experiences. There was a significant association of the frequency of interpersonal discrimination experiences with delayed and forgone care.
Experiences of interpersonal discrimination in health care were a frequent phenomenon in Germany and were significantly associated with unmet need. Such experiences must be considered an important issue for public health. Possible interventions to tackle discrimination include measures to reduce stereotypes and the abolition of the dual structure of statutory and private health insurance.
虽然调查医疗保健中感知到的歧视的程度、原因及可能后果的研究数量在不断增加,但其中许多研究并未区分医疗保健中的结构性歧视和人际歧视。后者基于刻板印象,发生在医疗保健提供者与患者的直接互动中。在本研究中,我们探讨了德国住院和门诊护理中不同人际歧视经历的频率及主要原因,以及歧视与延迟和放弃护理之间的关联。
分析基于对德国成年人口的在线调查(N = 3246)。使用《日常歧视量表》的修改版来评估住院和门诊护理中的人际歧视经历。对于每种经历,确定歧视的主要原因。延迟和放弃护理的指标指过去12个月内必要的就诊情况。
分析显示,三分之二(66%)的受访者报告在住院或门诊护理中至少经历过五种经历中的一种。医疗保健人员表现得比自己优越的经历报告最为频繁(门诊护理中为41.3%,住院护理中为27.7%)。所有歧视经历在门诊护理中比在住院护理中更为频繁。年龄和医疗保险是歧视经历最常被报告的原因。人际歧视经历的频率与延迟和放弃护理之间存在显著关联。
在德国,医疗保健中的人际歧视经历是一种常见现象,且与未满足的需求显著相关。此类经历必须被视为公共卫生的一个重要问题。应对歧视的可能干预措施包括减少刻板印象的措施以及废除法定医疗保险和私人医疗保险的二元结构。