• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为焦虑症患者远程提供DIALOG+的结果与体验——一项非对照试验性研究

Outcomes and experiences of DIALOG+ provided remotely for patients with anxiety disorders-A non-controlled pilot trial.

作者信息

Olivar Natividad, Carbonetti Fernando Luis, Brusco Luis Ignacio, Priebe Stefan

机构信息

Center of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 19;20(5):e0321744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321744. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321744
PMID:40388449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12088059/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-cost interventions in routine care are needed to reduce the burden of anxiety disorders. DIALOG+ is an evidence-based intervention specifically designed to make routine patient-clinician meetings in mental health care therapeutically effective. It has been shown to be beneficial in a range of studies, but so far not been tested in patients with a primary diagnosis of anxiety disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a non-controlled pilot trial in an out-patient service in Buenos Aires, Argentina. DIALOG+ was applied five times over a six-month period. Because of the pandemic all sessions had to be delivered remotely which had not been originally planned. At baseline and after the intervention, we assessed as outcome criteria subjective quality of life on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life, general symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the objective social situation on the Social Outcomes Index. Patient experiences were explored in semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Forty patients completed the study. All outcome criteria, quality of life (4.1±0.5 to 5.0±0.5; p<0.001), general symptoms (33.0±9.3 to 25.9±7.6; p<0.001) and the objective social situation (5.2±0.9 to 5.6±0.5; p=0.008) showed significant improvements. Patient reported largely positive experiences despite frequent technical problems with the online arrangements.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that DIALOG+ is feasible and beneficial for patients with anxiety disorders in routine care and that a remote delivery is a feasible realistic option for administering it. Future research should assess implementation methods and effectiveness in larger controlled trials and identify the effective mechanisms in DIALOG+.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was pre-registered (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN38851969) on 16/12/2019.

摘要

背景

需要在常规护理中采取低成本干预措施以减轻焦虑症的负担。DIALOG+是一种基于证据的干预措施,专门设计用于使精神卫生保健中的常规患者-临床医生会面具有治疗效果。一系列研究表明它是有益的,但迄今为止尚未在原发性焦虑症患者中进行测试。

方法

我们在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的一家门诊服务机构进行了一项非对照试点试验。在六个月的时间内应用了五次DIALOG+。由于疫情,所有疗程都必须远程进行,这原本并未在计划之中。在基线和干预后,我们评估了作为结果标准的曼彻斯特生活质量简短评估中的主观生活质量、简明精神病评定量表上的一般症状以及社会结果指数上的客观社会状况。通过半结构化访谈探索了患者的体验。

结果

40名患者完成了研究。所有结果标准,生活质量(从4.1±0.5至5.0±0.5;p<0.001)、一般症状(从33.0±9.3至25.9±7.6;p<0.001)和客观社会状况(从5.2±0.9至5.6±0.5;p=0.008)均显示出显著改善。尽管在线安排经常出现技术问题,但患者报告的体验大多是积极的。

结论

研究结果表明,DIALOG+在常规护理中对焦虑症患者是可行且有益的,并且远程实施是一种可行的现实选择。未来的研究应在更大规模的对照试验中评估实施方法和有效性,并确定DIALOG+中的有效机制。

试验注册

该试验于2019年12月16日进行了预注册(https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN38851969)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf8/12088059/35d386d5e151/pone.0321744.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf8/12088059/35d386d5e151/pone.0321744.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf8/12088059/35d386d5e151/pone.0321744.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes and experiences of DIALOG+ provided remotely for patients with anxiety disorders-A non-controlled pilot trial.为焦虑症患者远程提供DIALOG+的结果与体验——一项非对照试验性研究
PLoS One. 2025 May 19;20(5):e0321744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321744. eCollection 2025.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
10
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of a solution-focused approach (DIALOG+) for patients with severe mental illness and epilepsy in Uganda: A randomised controlled trial.聚焦解决方案的方法(DIALOG+)对乌干达重症精神疾病和癫痫患者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Psychiatry Res Commun. 2023 Mar;3(1):None. doi: 10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100097.
2
The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered in Routine Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.心理干预在常规实践中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Jan;50(1):43-57. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01225-y. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Common patient experiences across three resource-oriented interventions for severe mental illness: a qualitative study in low-resource settings.
三种面向资源的严重精神疾病干预措施中的常见患者体验:资源匮乏环境下的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04055-2.
4
Effectiveness of a structured intervention to make routine clinical meetings therapeutically effective (DIALOG+) for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A cluster randomised controlled trial.在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,一种使常规临床会议对抑郁和焦虑症患者具有治疗效果的结构化干预措施(DIALOG+)的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Psychiatry Res Commun. 2021 Dec;1(2):None. doi: 10.1016/j.psycom.2021.100010.
5
[The German Version of DIALOG+ for Patients with Psychosis - A Pilot Study].[用于精神病患者的德语版DIALOG+——一项试点研究]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Oct;46(7):376-380. doi: 10.1055/a-0961-3328. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
The effectiveness of four empirically supported psychotherapies for primary care depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.四种经验支持的心理治疗对初级保健抑郁和焦虑的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:1168-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective.全球精神卫生领域的挑战与机遇:从研究到实践的视角
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 May;19(5):28. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z.
8
Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics.中心极限定理:现代统计学的基石。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Apr;70(2):144-156. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
The Effectiveness of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution-Focused Approach (DIALOG+) for Patients with Psychosis: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial in Community Care.以问题解决为导向的患者为中心评估(DIALOG+)对精神病患者的疗效:社区护理中的实用集群随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(5):304-13. doi: 10.1159/000430991. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis.焦虑症治疗方法的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jul;30(4):183-92. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000078.