• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在日本,谁在在线学习方面表现出色?

Who excels in online learning in Japan?

作者信息

Tokiwa Eisuke

机构信息

SUNBLAZE Inc., Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 May 5;16:1420996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1420996. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1420996
PMID:40391108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12087180/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to elucidate the impact of Big Five personality traits on learning behaviors and outcomes in online education. Given the increasing reliance on digital learning platforms, understanding individual differences in learning performance is crucial, particularly in the Japanese context.

METHODS

Data were collected from 103 third-year high school students in Tokyo, utilizing the online learning platform "Study Sapuri" and a personality traits questionnaire (BFI-2-J). Learning behaviors were assessed through system logs, while personality traits were measured using a validated psychological scale. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to examine the relationships between these variables. The correlation calculations were based on Equations 1-3, which provide the framework for assessing relationships between variables.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that conscientiousness had the strongest positive influence on learning outcomes, with students scoring high in conscientiousness achieving superior results, particularly in STEM subjects. Additionally, agreeableness was positively associated with learning behaviors, such as the number of video content views on the platform. In contrast, extraversion showed varying effects depending on its facets: assertiveness positively influenced learning outcomes, while sociability was associated with a more passive approach. Moreover, students with high levels of neuroticism tended to adopt a cautious attitude toward learning, which was linked to longer study durations and potentially higher learning quality.

DISCUSSION

These findings highlight the role of personality traits in shaping online learning engagement and effectiveness. The study also suggests that Japan's cultural context may influence the relationship between personality traits and academic performance, leading to outcomes for extraversion and neuroticism that differ from those observed in other countries. The implications of these results for personalized learning strategies and digital education design are discussed.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在阐明大五人格特质对在线教育中学习行为和学习成果的影响。鉴于对数字学习平台的依赖日益增加,了解学习表现中的个体差异至关重要,尤其是在日本的背景下。

方法

从东京的103名高三学生中收集数据,使用在线学习平台“Study Sapuri”和一份人格特质问卷(BFI-2-J)。通过系统日志评估学习行为,同时使用经过验证的心理量表测量人格特质。采用斯皮尔曼相关性分析来检验这些变量之间的关系。相关性计算基于方程1-3,这些方程为评估变量之间的关系提供了框架。

结果

分析表明,尽责性对学习成果的积极影响最强,尽责性得分高的学生取得了更好的成绩,尤其是在STEM学科方面。此外,宜人性与学习行为呈正相关,例如平台上视频内容的观看次数。相比之下,外向性根据其不同方面表现出不同的影响: assertiveness(果敢性)对学习成果有积极影响,而社交性则与更被动的学习方式相关。此外,神经质水平高的学生往往对学习采取谨慎态度,这与更长的学习时间和可能更高的学习质量有关。

讨论

这些发现突出了人格特质在塑造在线学习参与度和有效性方面的作用。该研究还表明,日本的文化背景可能会影响人格特质与学业成绩之间的关系,导致外向性和神经质的结果与其他国家观察到的不同。讨论了这些结果对个性化学习策略和数字教育设计的影响。

相似文献

1
Who excels in online learning in Japan?在日本,谁在在线学习方面表现出色?
Front Psychol. 2025 May 5;16:1420996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1420996. eCollection 2025.
2
The mediating effect of perceived stress on the relationship between big five personality traits and suboptimal health status in Chinese population: a nationwide survey in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.感知压力在中国人群大五人格特质与亚健康状态关系中的中介作用:基于预测、预防和个性化医学框架的全国性调查
EPMA J. 2023 Dec 11;15(1):25-38. doi: 10.1007/s13167-023-00349-x. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Digital Students' Satisfaction With and Intention to Use Online Teaching Modes, Role of Big Five Personality Traits.数字时代学生对在线教学模式的满意度及使用意愿:大五人格特质的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:956281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956281. eCollection 2022.
4
Interplay between personality traits and learning strategies: the missing link.人格特质与学习策略的相互作用:缺失的环节。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2022 Dec 1;46(4):637-646. doi: 10.1152/advan.00001.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Exploring the impact of stuttering simulation-based learning and personality traits on clinical self-efficacy and professional interest among speech-language pathology students.探索口吃模拟学习和人格特质对言语病理学学生临床自我效能感和专业兴趣的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2737-2751. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13112. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
6
Gender differences in the relationship between big five personality traits and aggression among physical education students.体育专业学生中,大五人格特质与攻击性之间关系的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93038-w.
7
Learning burnout and its association with perceived stress, social support, and the Big Five personality traits in Chinese medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,中国医学生的学习倦怠及其与感知压力、社会支持和大五人格特质的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04453-6.
8
Big five personality traits of medical students and workplace performance in the final clerkship year using an EPA framework.医学生的五大人格特质与最终实习年的工作表现,采用 EPA 框架。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05434-x.
9
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Personality traits and stress perception as predictors of students' online engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic.人格特质和压力感知作为新冠疫情期间学生在线参与度的预测因素
Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Aug;194:111645. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111645. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relation of Big Five Personality Traits on Academic Performance, Well-Being and Home Study Satisfaction in Corona Times.新冠疫情时期大五人格特质与学业成绩、幸福感及居家学习满意度的关系
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):368-384. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14020025.
2
Impact of personality traits on learners' navigational behavior patterns in an online course: a lag sequential analysis approach.人格特质对在线课程中学习者导航行为模式的影响:一种滞后序列分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1071985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071985. eCollection 2023.
3
Relationship between employees' perceived illegitimate tasks and their work procrastination behavior: Role of negative emotions and paternalistic dimensions.员工感知到的不合理任务与其工作拖延行为之间的关系:负面情绪和家长式维度的作用
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e14984. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14984. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Zooming their way through university: Which Big 5 traits facilitated students' adjustment to online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic.飞速度过大学时光:在新冠疫情期间,哪五大性格特质有助于学生适应在线课程
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Oct;180:110969. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110969. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》日本版的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:924351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924351. eCollection 2022.
6
Personality and satisfaction with online courses: The relation between the Big Five personality traits and satisfaction with online learning activities.人格与在线课程满意度:大五人格特质与在线学习活动满意度之间的关系。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(1):879-904. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11199-x. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
7
The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间性别、教育水平和性格对在线学习成果的影响。
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
8
Big Five personality traits and academic performance: A meta-analysis.大五人格特质与学业表现:元分析。
J Pers. 2022 Apr;90(2):222-255. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12663. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement.一项关于数学焦虑与数学成绩关系的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Feb;147(2):134-168. doi: 10.1037/bul0000307. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Perfectionism and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: A Meta-Analytic Review.完美主义与五因素人格模型:元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep/Oct;23(4):367-390. doi: 10.1177/1088868318814973. Epub 2019 Jan 6.