• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要基于生化数据,使用机器学习预测血流感染。

Prediction of bloodstream infection using machine learning based primarily on biochemical data.

作者信息

Marandi Ramtin Zargari, Hertz Frederik Boetius, Thomassen Jesper Qvist, Rasmussen Steen Christian, Frikke-Schmidt Ruth, Frimodt-Møller Niels, Nielsen Karen Leth, MacPherson Cameron Ross

机构信息

Centre of Excellence for Health, Immunity and Infections (CHIP), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen , Denmark.

Department of Clinical Microbiology 9301, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Henrik Harpestrengs vej 4A, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01821-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-01821-6
PMID:40394073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12092749/
Abstract

Early diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is crucial for informed antibiotic use. This study developed a machine learning approach for early BSI detection using a comprehensive dataset from Rigshospitalet, Denmark (2010-2020). The dataset included 144,398 samples from adult patients, containing blood culture results, demographics, and up to 36 biochemical variables. Positive blood culture was observed in 6.4% of samples, mostly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus faecium. 80% of the samples (N = 43,351 patients) were used for ML model development and five-fold cross-validation, with 20% for independent testing (N = 10,837). Among seven models, LightGBM performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.69 on the test set. It was more accurate in detecting negatives, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.96 and specificity of 0.74, compared to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.13 and sensitivity of 0.54. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identified platelets, leukocytes, and neutrophils-to-lymphocytes as the top-3 predictive features. The model showed higher sensitivity (average 0.66) for common pathogens, e.g., 0.71 for E. coli. Results highlight the potential of biochemical variables as diagnostic factors for BSI, indicating clinical use to focus on identifying patients at low risks and can be further enhanced in future investigations.

摘要

血流感染(BSI)的早期诊断对于合理使用抗生素至关重要。本研究利用丹麦里格霍斯医院(2010 - 2020年)的综合数据集,开发了一种用于早期BSI检测的机器学习方法。该数据集包括来自成年患者的144,398个样本,包含血培养结果、人口统计学信息以及多达36个生化变量。6.4%的样本血培养呈阳性,主要由金黄色金黄色血金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和粪肠球菌引起。80%的样本(N = 43,351例患者)用于机器学习模型开发和五折交叉验证,20%用于独立测试(N = 10,837)。在七个模型中,LightGBM表现最佳,在测试集上的AUC为0.69。与阳性预测值(PPV)为0.13和灵敏度为0.54相比,其在检测阴性结果时更准确,阴性预测值(NPV)为0.96,特异性为0.74。SHapley加法解释(SHAP)确定血小板、白细胞和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值为前三大预测特征。该模型对常见病原体表现出更高的灵敏度(平均0.66),例如对大肠杆菌的灵敏度为0.71。结果突出了生化变量作为BSI诊断因素的潜力,表明临床应用应侧重于识别低风险患者,并且在未来研究中可以进一步改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/b330b9ee79c8/41598_2025_1821_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/1ef158b9baec/41598_2025_1821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/9a7119874f6e/41598_2025_1821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/b330b9ee79c8/41598_2025_1821_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/1ef158b9baec/41598_2025_1821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/9a7119874f6e/41598_2025_1821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d176/12092749/b330b9ee79c8/41598_2025_1821_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of bloodstream infection using machine learning based primarily on biochemical data.主要基于生化数据,使用机器学习预测血流感染。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01821-6.
2
Development and application of an early prediction model for risk of bloodstream infection based on real-world study.基于真实世界研究的血流感染风险早期预测模型的开发与应用
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 May 14;25(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03020-9.
3
Machine learning-based prognostic model for bloodstream infections in hematological malignancies using Th1/Th2 cytokines.基于机器学习的使用Th1/Th2细胞因子的血液系统恶性肿瘤血流感染预后模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10808-7.
4
Enhancing pathogens detection in suspected geriatric bloodstream infections using Nanopore-targeted sequencing.使用纳米孔靶向测序技术增强对疑似老年血流感染病原体的检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):e0155424. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01554-24. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Predicting community acquired bloodstream infection in infants using full blood count parameters and C-reactive protein; a machine learning study.利用全血细胞计数参数和 C 反应蛋白预测婴儿获得性血流感染;一项机器学习研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jul;183(7):2983-2993. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05441-6. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
Machine learning-based prediction model for patients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.基于机器学习的复发性金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者预测模型
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02878-z.
7
T2Bacteria magnetic resonance assay for the rapid detection of ESKAPEc pathogens directly in whole blood.T2Bacteria 磁共振检测法可直接从全血中快速检测 ESKAPEE 病原菌。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(suppl_4):iv20-iv26. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky049.
8
Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning.利用机器学习预测血流感染的结局。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99105-2.
9
Molecular rapid diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections: Nanopore targeted sequencing with pathogen-specific primers.血流感染的分子快速诊断检测:靶向纳米孔测序与病原体特异性引物。
J Infect. 2024 Jun;88(6):106166. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106166. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
10
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 患者的败血症死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The Synergy of Machine Learning and Epidemiology in Addressing Carbapenem Resistance: A Comprehensive Review.机器学习与流行病学在应对碳青霉烯类耐药性方面的协同作用:全面综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Oct 21;13(10):996. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13100996.
2
Using Machine Learning to Predict Antimicrobial Resistance-A Literature Review.利用机器学习预测抗菌药物耐药性——文献综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;12(3):452. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030452.
3
Development of a machine learning model for early prediction of plasma leakage in suspected dengue patients.
开发一种机器学习模型,用于早期预测疑似登革热患者的血浆渗漏。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Mar 13;17(3):e0010758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010758. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Impact of Antibiotic Treatment on the Gut Microbiome and its Resistome in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.抗生素治疗对造血干细胞移植受者肠道微生物组及其耐药组的影响。
J Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 28;228(1):28-36. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad033.
5
Pre-Transplant Prediction of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Using the Gut Microbiome.利用肠道微生物组预测移植前急性移植物抗宿主病。
Cells. 2022 Dec 16;11(24):4089. doi: 10.3390/cells11244089.
6
Development of a risk prediction model for bloodstream infection in patients with fever of unknown origin.不明原因发热患者血流感染风险预测模型的建立。
J Transl Med. 2022 Dec 8;20(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03796-8.
7
Early Biomarker-Guided Prediction of Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Patients: C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Leukocytes.危重症患者血流感染的早期生物标志物引导预测:C反应蛋白、降钙素原和白细胞
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 14;9(10):ofac467. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac467. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Prognostic Value of Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血小板与淋巴细胞比值对脓毒症的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 6;2022:9056363. doi: 10.1155/2022/9056363. eCollection 2022.
9
Serum Calcium Levels and in-Hospital Infection Risk in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者的血清钙水平与院内感染风险
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 May 3;18:943-950. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S354447. eCollection 2022.
10
Machine-learning based prediction of prognostic risk factors in patients with invasive candidiasis infection and bacterial bloodstream infection: a singled centered retrospective study.基于机器学习的侵袭性念珠菌感染和细菌性血流感染患者预后危险因素预测:一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07125-8.