Suppr超能文献

一项评估冷冻疗法联合病灶内注射类固醇、病灶内注射博来霉素联合类固醇以及分次二氧化碳激光治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效和不良反应的随机研究。

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Cryotherapy Combined with Intralesional Steroids, Intralesional Bleomycin Combined with Steroids and Fractional CO Laser in Keloids.

作者信息

Krishna P Sravya, Gopal K V T, Ananditha K, Reddy V Sai Teja, Rao T Narayana

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Maharajah's Institute of Medical Sciences, Nellimarla, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Indian Dermatol Online J. 2025 Apr 15;16(3):407-413. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_789_24. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of keloids is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of cryotherapy combined with intralesional steroid injections (Cy + ILS), intralesional combined bleomycin and steroids (ILB + S), and fractional carbon dioxide laser (Fr CO) in keloid management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety cases with keloids were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of keloids was graded using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS). Group A, B, and C patients were treated with Cy + ILS, ILB + S, and Fr CO, respectively for four sittings at 4-week intervals. Improvement in VSS score was calculated after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks, and with HFUS after 16 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and ANOVA.

RESULTS

At the end of 16 weeks, the reductions in VSS in Cy + ILS, ILB + S, and Fr CO groups were 5.12 (60.09%), 5.84 (69.30%), and 3.06 (38.3%), respectively ( = 0.00). The difference in mean VSS reduction after 16 weeks between ILB + S and Cy + ILS was not significant ( = 0.28), whereas ILB + S and Cy + ILS were more efficacious than Fr CO ( = 0.01 and = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between ILB + S and Fr CO ( = 0.11) but higher with Cy + ILS ( = 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, non-blinded design, and short follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

ILB + S may be considered as the first-line treatment option for keloids in view of its satisfactory efficacy, and excellent safety profile.

摘要

背景

尽管有多种治疗方式可供选择,但瘢痕疙瘩的治疗往往并不彻底,复发率很高。本研究旨在评估冷冻疗法联合病灶内注射类固醇(Cy + ILS)、病灶内联合注射博来霉素和类固醇(ILB + S)以及分次二氧化碳激光(Fr CO)治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

纳入90例瘢痕疙瘩患者,随机分为三组,每组30例。采用温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)和高频超声(HFUS)对瘢痕疙瘩的基线严重程度进行分级。A组、B组和C组患者分别接受Cy + ILS、ILB + S和Fr CO治疗,共进行4次治疗,间隔4周。在第4、8、12和16周计算VSS评分的改善情况,并在16周后用HFUS评估。每次就诊时,记录有无不良反应。采用卡方检验和方差分析进行统计分析。

结果

16周结束时, Cy + ILS组、ILB + S组和Fr CO组的VSS降低值分别为5.12(60.09%)、5.84(69.30%)和3.06(38.3%)(P = 0.00)。ILB + S组和Cy + ILS组16周后平均VSS降低值的差异不显著(P = 0.28),而ILB + S组和Cy + ILS组比Fr CO组更有效(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.02)。ILB + S组和Fr CO组的不良反应发生率相当(P = 0.11),但Cy + ILS组更高(P = 0.04)。

局限性

样本量小、非盲法设计和随访期短。

结论

鉴于ILB + S疗效满意且安全性良好,可考虑作为瘢痕疙瘩的一线治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47f/12088498/42c7dca2d9e5/IDOJ-16-407-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验