Alshehri Abdulaziz, Aljassim Nada, Alharbi Ali, Aljendil Abdulqadus, Alharbi Hatem, Aldaraweish Shaikah, Alfozan Noura, Alibrahim Abdulrahman, Alotaibi Bader, Aldhaban Nasser, Almutairi Abdullelah
Respiratory Therapy, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Pediatric Intensive Care, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 20;17(4):e82655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82655. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Background and objective Dornase alpha can be considered an alternative therapy when the standard therapy fails, but evidence of nebulization through artificial airways for persistent pulmonary atelectasis is limited. The study aimed to determine the efficacy of dornase alpha nebulization on persistent atelectasis in non-cystic fibrosis patients with and without artificial airways. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) between February 2020 and October 2023. The pre- and post-treatment MRAS (Modified Radiologically Assisted Score) was used to determine the treatment efficacy. The independent t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was applied after estimating the propensity score to adjust baseline characteristics to reduce selection and indication bias. A value of p<0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. Results Dornase alpha was not an independent positive predictor of MRAS score improvement (B=0.326, p=0.757, Exp(B)=1.385) beyond other variables. However, the dornase group (n = 132) significantly improved the mean MRAS score by 6.08+2.69 compared to the non-dornase group's (n=143) mean MRAS score of 5.14+2.4, with a moderate effect size (Cohen's d=0.364, 95% CI: 0.126 to 0.603; p=0.03) in resolving persistent atelectasis. Conclusion Dornase alpha did not independently improve MRAS scores in pediatric patients with persistent atelectasis, controlling for selection/indication bias and confounding variables. The observed differences in MRAS improvement in the initial analysis were most likely due to baseline differences.
当标准治疗失败时,可考虑将重组人脱氧核糖核酸酶α(Dornase alpha)作为一种替代疗法,但通过人工气道雾化吸入治疗持续性肺不张的证据有限。本研究旨在确定Dornase alpha雾化吸入对有无人工气道的非囊性纤维化患者持续性肺不张的疗效。方法:对2020年2月至2023年10月在法赫德国王医疗城(KFMC)儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院的患者进行回顾性横断面研究。采用治疗前后的改良放射学辅助评分(MRAS)来确定治疗效果。采用独立t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。在估计倾向得分后应用多变量回归分析,以调整基线特征,减少选择和指征偏倚。p<0.05表示具有统计学意义。结果:除其他变量外,Dornase alpha并非MRAS评分改善的独立阳性预测因子(B = 0.326,p = 0.757,Exp(B)=1.385)。然而,Dornase组(n = 132)的平均MRAS评分较非Dornase组(n = 143)的平均MRAS评分5.14 + 2.4显著提高了6.08 + 2.69,在解决持续性肺不张方面具有中等效应量(Cohen's d = 0.364,95% CI:0.126至0.603;p = 0.03)。结论:在控制选择/指征偏倚和混杂变量的情况下,Dornase alpha并不能独立改善持续性肺不张儿科患者的MRAS评分。初始分析中观察到的MRAS改善差异很可能是由于基线差异所致。