Xue Chenxia, Duan Zhouying, Zhou Ruijuan, Chen Fei, Shen Pengfei, Zhang Haiyan, Liu Hongxiang, Yu Bo
Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai, PR China.
Department of Rehabilitation, School of International Medical Technology, Shanghai Sanda University Shanghai, PR China.
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2025 Apr 25;14(2):104-110. doi: 10.62347/VBUR5104. eCollection 2025.
In the intensive care unit (ICU), patients often experience restricted mobility due to their critical condition, potentially leading to negative effects on both muscle strength and immune function. Previous research has highlighted the beneficial effects of early mobilization among patients, regardless of mechanical ventilation status. Hence, early bed cycling serves as a potential facilitator for early mobilization and is considered a feasible intervention for critically ill patients within the ICU. To mitigate this concern, we propose a randomized controlled clinical trial aiming to assess the efficacy of early bed cycling for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and analgosedation. The study will encompass 56 participants randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group, each consisting of 28 patients. Participants in both groups will receive health education. However, the control group will not receive any therapeutic intervention throughout the study. In contrast, the experimental group will undergo passive bed cycling of their lower extremities for 20 minutes at a rate of 30 revolutions per minute. Primary outcomes will focus on changes in the rectus femoris muscle area and thickness, evaluated using ultrasound, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and nitric oxide (NO) production function. Secondary endpoints will encompass the modified Barthel index score, Medical Research Council total score at 1, 2, and 4 weeks following the final treatment session, participants' mechanical ventilation duration, rate of extubation in the second week, 28-day survival rate, and occurrence of adverse reactions. Any encountered side effects will be duly documented. Statistical analysis will be employed to compare patient outcomes between the treatment and control groups.
在重症监护病房(ICU),患者常因病情危急而活动受限,这可能对肌肉力量和免疫功能产生负面影响。先前的研究强调了早期活动对患者的有益影响,无论其机械通气状态如何。因此,早期床上蹬车是早期活动的潜在促进因素,被认为是ICU内重症患者的一种可行干预措施。为缓解这一问题,我们提出一项随机对照临床试验,旨在评估早期床上蹬车对接受机械通气和镇痛镇静治疗患者的疗效。该研究将纳入56名参与者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组28名患者。两组参与者都将接受健康教育。然而,对照组在整个研究过程中不会接受任何治疗干预。相比之下,实验组将以每分钟30转的速度对其下肢进行20分钟的被动床上蹬车。主要结局将集中在股直肌肌肉面积和厚度的变化,使用超声、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、IL-10和一氧化氮(NO)产生功能进行评估。次要终点将包括改良Barthel指数评分、最后一次治疗后1周、2周和4周的医学研究委员会总分、参与者的机械通气持续时间、第二周的拔管率、28天生存率以及不良反应的发生情况。任何遇到的副作用都将得到妥善记录。将采用统计分析来比较治疗组和对照组的患者结局。