• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在实习轮转期间使用单点评分量表对药学专业学生自我反思与带教老师评价的比较

Comparison of Pharmacy Learner Self-Reflection and Preceptor Evaluations Using a Single-Point Rubric during Experiential Rotations.

作者信息

Nowak Jennifer A, Baker Carrie N, Bowers Riley D

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center.

Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences.

出版信息

Innov Pharm. 2025 Jan 14;15(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733
PMID:40401299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12090091/
Abstract

Development of successful, practice-ready pharmacists includes ensuring learners are self-aware and able to reflect on knowledge, skills, and abilities. Though evidence indicates reflective practices are important in pharmacy education, there is a general lack of structure for implementation of reflective practices. The primary objective of this study was to compare learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations for scored learning activities completed on experiential rotations to assess consistency of student self-reflections. This study compared learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations using a single-point rubric for three types of assignments completed during experiential rotations at a community teaching hospital. These assignments included clinical presentations, patient counseling, and written drug information responses. Data were collected via retrospective review of completed, de-identified evaluations. The primary endpoint was differences in overall scores between students and evaluators, analyzed via paired T-test. A total of 68 learner evaluations were reviewed, with a majority (89.7%) completed by students on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Overall, no significant differences emerged between student and preceptor evaluator scores, indicating that students were able to consistently self-reflect. Pharmacy students on experiential rotations demonstrated consistency in self-scoring and evaluation with preceptors on assignments related to presentations, drug information responses, and patient counseling when using single-point rubrics to self-evaluate.

摘要

培养成功且能胜任实际工作的药剂师,包括确保学习者有自我认知,并能够反思自己的知识、技能和能力。尽管有证据表明反思性实践在药学教育中很重要,但反思性实践的实施普遍缺乏系统性。本研究的主要目的是将学习者的自我评价与带教老师和药学住院医师的评价进行比较,以评估学生在实习轮转期间完成的计分学习活动的自我反思的一致性。本研究使用单点评分标准,将学习者的自我评价与带教老师和药学住院医师对在社区教学医院实习轮转期间完成的三种类型作业的评价进行比较。这些作业包括临床报告、患者咨询和书面药物信息回复。数据通过回顾已完成的、匿名的评价收集。主要终点是学生和评估者之间的总体评分差异,通过配对t检验进行分析。共审查了68份学习者评价,其中大部分(89.7%)是学生在高级药学实践经验中完成的。总体而言,学生和带教老师评估者的分数没有显著差异,这表明学生能够持续进行自我反思。在使用单点评分标准进行自我评估时,参加实习轮转的药学专业学生在与报告、药物信息回复和患者咨询相关的作业中,与带教老师的自我评分和评价具有一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9300/12090091/66a1378aebc2/21550417-15-04-5733_Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9300/12090091/66a1378aebc2/21550417-15-04-5733_Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9300/12090091/66a1378aebc2/21550417-15-04-5733_Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Pharmacy Learner Self-Reflection and Preceptor Evaluations Using a Single-Point Rubric during Experiential Rotations.在实习轮转期间使用单点评分量表对药学专业学生自我反思与带教老师评价的比较
Innov Pharm. 2025 Jan 14;15(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733. eCollection 2024.
2
Rotation self-evaluation checklist (REC): A preceptors' perspective.轮转自我评估清单(REC):带教老师的视角
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Mar;11(3):258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
Comparison of full-time faculty preceptor and volunteer preceptor evaluations of experiential students.全职导师和志愿者导师对实习学生的评价比较。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Dec;12(12):1417-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
The Divergence between Self- and Preceptor-Assessments of Student Performance during Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.高级药学实践经验中学生表现的自我评估与带教老师评估之间的差异
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(3):79. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12030079.
5
Changes in Pharmacy Students' Metacognition Through Self-Evaluation During Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.通过高级药学实践经验中的自我评价,改变药学学生的元认知。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7489. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7489.
6
Assessing student confidence in interprofessional communication during primary care advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs).评估学生在初级保健高级药学实践经验 (APPE) 中进行跨专业交流的信心。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Nov;12(11):1365-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Assessing Preceptor and Student Perceptions of Remote Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估在COVID-19大流行期间带教老师和学生对远程高级药学实践经验学习的看法。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;10(5):103. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10050103.
8
An Analysis of Canadian Doctor of Pharmacy Student Experiences in Non-Traditional Student-Preceptor Models.非传统师生模式下的加拿大药学博士学生体验分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7367. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7367.
9
Preceptor confidence and engagement in providing leadership activities to students in advanced pharmacy practice experiences.指导教师在高级药学实践经验中为学生提供领导活动时的信心和参与度。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jul;10(7):895-902. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
10
Exploring practice site contributions and professionalization impact of engaging student pharmacists on hematology-oncology advanced pharmacy practice experience rotations.探讨让学生药剂师参与血液肿瘤学高级药学实践经验轮转对实践基地贡献和专业化的影响。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Jan;28(1):109-118. doi: 10.1177/1078155220985579. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences on Student Pharmacist Metacognition.评估高级药学实践经验对药师学生元认知的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jun;86(5):8676. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8676. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
Changes in Pharmacy Students' Metacognition Through Self-Evaluation During Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.通过高级药学实践经验中的自我评价,改变药学学生的元认知。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7489. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7489.
3
Pharmacy Students' Perceptions of Reflective Portfolios and their Effect on Students' Deep Information-Processing Skills.
药学专业学生对反思性文件夹的看法及其对学生深度信息处理技能的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6851. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6851.
4
Assessment of Learner Metacognition in a Professional Pharmacy Elective Course.专业药学选修课程中学生元认知能力的评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Dec;81(10):6034. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6034.
5
Strategies for Improving Learner Metacognition in Health Professional Education.提高健康职业教育中学习者元认知的策略。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):78. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81478.
6
The Effect of Reflective Activities on Reflective Thinking Ability in an Undergraduate Pharmacy Curriculum.反思活动对本科药学课程中反思性思维能力的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):65. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80465.
7
A Model for Assessing Reflective Practices in Pharmacy Education.药学教育中反思性实践评估模型
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Oct 25;79(8):124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe798124.
8
Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education.反思性实践及其对药学教育的启示。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Feb 12;78(1):18. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78118.
9
Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading.同伴评价和自我评估与教师评价的比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):130. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757130.