• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单倍体冷冻胚胎移植活产结局的预测模型:逻辑回归与机器学习方法的比较分析

Predictive model for live birth outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a comparative analysis of logistic regression and machine learning approaches.

作者信息

Abdala Andrea, Kalafat Erkan, Elkhatib Ibrahim, Bayram Aşina, Melado Laura, Fatemi Human, Nogueira Daniela

机构信息

IVF Department, ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03524-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10815-025-03524-3
PMID:40402397
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a predictive model for live birth (LB) outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers (seFET) based on patient's characteristics and embryo parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including 1979 seFET performed between March 2017 and December 2023. Prediction models were built using logistic regression (LR), random forest classifier (RFC), support vector machines (SVM), and a gradient booster (XGBoost). Considered variables associated with LB outcomes were blastocyst expansion, blastocyst inner cell mass (ICM) and TE quality, day (D) of TE biopsy (D5, D6, and D7), female age and body mass index (BMI), distance from the uterine fundus at embryo transfer, endometrial preparation as natural cycles (NC) or hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), and endometrial thickness. Model performance was evaluated using area under the precision-recall curve and calibration metrics.

RESULTS

Variables that were negatively associated with LB rate were BMI (OR = 0.79 [0.64-0.96], P = 0.020 for overweight and OR = 0.76 [0.60-0.95], P = 0.015 for obese class I/II), ICM grade B (OR = 0.72 [0.57-0.90], P = 0.005) or C (OR = 0.21 [0.15-0.30], P < 0.001), TE grade C (OR = 0.32 [0.24-0.43], P < 0.001), and blastocyst biopsied on D6 (OR = 0.66 [0.55-0.80], P < 0.001 or D7 (OR = 0.19[0.09-0.37], P < 0.001). The LR model was the best in terms of overall classification performance (C-statistics: 0.626 ± 0.018 vs. 0.606 ± 0.018, 0.581 ± 0.018, 0.601 ± 0.017, LR vs. RFC, XGBoost, and SVM, respectively, P < 0.001). A prediction model of LB outcome was developed and is free to access: https://artfertilityclinics.shinyapps.io/ABLE/ .

CONCLUSION

LR demonstrated a stable validation performance and superior LB prediction, aiding as a predictive tool for patient counselling and assessing success in seFET cycles.

摘要

目的

基于患者特征和胚胎参数,开发并验证单倍体冷冻胚胎移植(seFET)活产(LB)结局的预测模型。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2017年3月至2023年12月期间进行的1979次seFET。使用逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林分类器(RFC)、支持向量机(SVM)和梯度提升器(XGBoost)构建预测模型。与LB结局相关的变量包括囊胚扩张、囊胚内细胞团(ICM)和滋养外胚层(TE)质量、TE活检日(D)(D5、D6和D7)、女性年龄和体重指数(BMI)、胚胎移植时距子宫底的距离、子宫内膜准备方式为自然周期(NC)或激素替代疗法(HRT)以及子宫内膜厚度。使用精确召回率曲线下面积和校准指标评估模型性能。

结果

与LB率呈负相关的变量有BMI(超重时OR = 0.79 [0.64 - 0.96],P = 0.020;I/II级肥胖时OR = 0.76 [0.60 - 0.95],P = 0.015)、ICM B级(OR = 0.72 [0.57 - 0.90],P = 0.005)或C级(OR = 0.21 [0.15 - 0.30],P < 0.001)、TE C级(OR = 0.32 [0.24 - 0.43],P < 0.001)以及在D6进行活检的囊胚(OR = 0.66 [0.55 - 0.80],P < 0.001)或D7(OR = 0.19[0.09 - 0.37],P < 0.001)。就总体分类性能而言,LR模型最佳(C统计量:0.626 ± 0.018,分别与RFC、XGBoost和SVM的0.606 ± 0.018、0.581 ± 0.018、0.601 ± 0.017相比,P < 0.001)。开发了一个LB结局预测模型,可免费访问:https://artfertilityclinics.shinyapps.io/ABLE/ 。

结论

LR显示出稳定的验证性能和卓越的LB预测能力,有助于作为患者咨询和评估seFET周期成功率的预测工具。

相似文献

1
Predictive model for live birth outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a comparative analysis of logistic regression and machine learning approaches.单倍体冷冻胚胎移植活产结局的预测模型:逻辑回归与机器学习方法的比较分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03524-3.
2
Assessing the clinical value of day 7 blastocysts: a predictive model for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles.评估第7天囊胚的临床价值:非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)周期的预测模型。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jan;42(1):243-253. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03305-4. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Evaluation of day 5 versus day 6 blastocyst biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing: clinical and neonatal outcomes.着床前基因检测中第5天与第6天囊胚活检的评估:临床及新生儿结局
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 16;16:1544009. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1544009. eCollection 2025.
4
Intra-individual variability of serum progesterone levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer in hormonal replacement therapy cycles.激素替代疗法周期中冷冻囊胚移植日血清孕酮水平的个体内变异性。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Apr 3;39(4):742-748. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae015.
5
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
6
Impact of endometrial thickness on reproductive outcome in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫内膜厚度对新鲜胚胎移植和冻融胚胎移植生殖结局的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Sep;66(3):271-281. doi: 10.1002/uog.29270. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
7
Does endometrial thickness impact live birth rate following a frozen embryo transfer: outcomes of 30 676 euploid single embryo transfers.冷冻胚胎移植后子宫内膜厚度会影响活产率吗:30676例整倍体单胚胎移植的结果
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf129.
8
Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎在辅助生殖技术中的移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6.
9
A randomized controlled trial comparing embryo vitrification with slush nitrogen to liquid nitrogen in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer: embryology and clinical outcomes.一项针对接受冻融胚胎移植的女性,比较胚胎玻璃化冷冻使用半融氮与液氮的随机对照试验:胚胎学及临床结局
Hum Reprod. 2025 Mar 1;40(3):426-433. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf003.
10
Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射后移植的胚胎数量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 29;2013(7):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Pre-IVF Day 2 TSH Levels on Treatment Success and Obstetric Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis with Machine Learning-Based Data Evaluation.体外受精前第2天促甲状腺激素水平对治疗成功率和产科结局的影响:一项基于机器学习数据评估的回顾性单中心分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 20;14(13):4407. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134407.
2
Developing a live birth prediction model for single euploid frozen embryo transfer using machine learning: a novel approach.利用机器学习开发单倍体冷冻胚胎移植的活产预测模型:一种新方法。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03568-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Ongoing pregnancy rates in single euploid frozen embryo transfers remain unaffected by female age: a retrospective study.单囊胚移植中活产率不受女性年龄影响:一项回顾性研究。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Aug;49(2):104074. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104074. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Predictors of success after in vitro fertilization.体外受精后成功的预测因素。
Fertil Steril. 2024 May;121(5):742-751. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
3
Development and validation of 'Patient Optimizer' (POP) algorithms for predicting surgical risk with machine learning.
用于通过机器学习预测手术风险的“患者优化器”(POP)算法的开发与验证
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02463-w.
4
Embryo Selection for IVF using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Light Microscopic Images of Embryo and Additional Factors.基于胚胎和其他因素的光镜图像的机器学习技术对 IVF 胚胎进行选择。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340767.
5
Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study.囊胚质量与生殖及围产结局:一项多国家多中心观察性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec 4;38(12):2391-2399. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead212.
6
External validation of models for predicting cumulative live birth over multiple complete cycles of IVF treatment.预测多次完整 IVF 治疗周期中累积活产的模型的外部验证。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Oct 3;38(10):1998-2010. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead165.
7
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.通过人工智能与胚胎学家进行胚胎选择:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023.
8
Where next for improved embryo selection?改进胚胎选择的下一步方向在哪里?
Fertil Steril. 2023 Aug;120(2):217. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
9
Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women.基于机器学习的体外受精孕妇活产预测模型的构建。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05775-3.
10
Association between a morphokinetic ploidy prediction model risk score and miscarriage and live birth: a multicentre cohort study.一种形态动力学倍性预测模型风险评分与流产和活产的关系:一项多中心队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2023 Oct;120(4):834-843. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 10.