Suppr超能文献

蛋白质N-糖基化特征联合CA19-9可准确区分胰腺癌病例与健康对照及胰腺良性疾病。

Protein N-Glycosylation Traits Combined with CA19-9 Accurately Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer Cases From Healthy Controls and Benign Pancreatic Diseases.

作者信息

Bogdanski Aleksander M, Klatte Derk C F, van Leerdam Monique E, Cobbaert Christa M, Ballieux Bart E P B, van Hooft Jeanin E, Clift Kristin E, Wuhrer Manfred, Mesker Wilma E, Bi Yan, Wallace Michael B, van der Burgt Yuri E M

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2025 May 23;54(9):e823-30. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002517.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

New methods are needed to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) earlier to improve outcomes. We previously reported that a panel of protein N-glycosylation traits (NGTs) discriminated PDAC from healthy-controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81-0.88. However, it remained unclear whether this panel accurately differentiates PDAC from other benign pancreatic disorders. Our study aims to evaluate the performance of the NGT panel in combination with CA19-9, in a diverse cohort, including PDAC cases, healthy-controls and controls with benign pancreatic disorders.

METHODS

Protein N-glycosylation profiles were determined in plasma samples using an in-house developed mass spectrometry assay. CA19-9 levels were measured using routine immunoassay test. Results of total plasma NGTs and CA19-9 were evaluated separately as well as in combination. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs), AUC, sensitivity and specificity to determine the performance of NGTs and CA19-9 in distinguishing PDAC from controls.

RESULTS

In total 221 individuals were included: 45 (20.4%) with PDAC, and 176 (79.6%) controls (53 healthy and 123 with benign pancreatic disease). The AUC for differentiating PDAC from the total control cohort based on the combination of the NGT panel and CA19-9 was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), with a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). Comparison of PDAC cases with healthy-controls only, resulted in an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.93) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Both plasma NGTs and CA19-9 distinguish PDAC from a diverse-control cohort. The accuracy further improves when these readouts are combined, showing promise for future early detection methods.

摘要

目的

需要新的方法来更早地检测胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)以改善治疗效果。我们之前报道过一组蛋白质N-糖基化特征(NGT)能够区分PDAC与健康对照,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.81 - 0.88。然而,该组特征是否能准确区分PDAC与其他良性胰腺疾病仍不清楚。我们的研究旨在评估NGT组与CA19-9联合使用在一个多样化队列中的表现,该队列包括PDAC病例、健康对照以及患有良性胰腺疾病的对照。

方法

使用内部开发的质谱分析法测定血浆样本中的蛋白质N-糖基化谱。使用常规免疫分析测试测量CA19-9水平。分别以及联合评估总血浆NGT和CA19-9的结果。进行逻辑回归以计算优势比(OR)、AUC、敏感性和特异性,以确定NGT和CA19-9在区分PDAC与对照方面的表现。

结果

总共纳入221名个体:45名(20.4%)患有PDAC,176名(79.6%)对照(53名健康对照和123名患有良性胰腺疾病)。基于NGT组和CA19-9联合区分PDAC与总对照队列的AUC为0.94(95%置信区间,0.90 - 0.97),敏感性为0.89(95%置信区间,0.78 - 0.98),特异性为0.86(95%置信区间,0.81 - 0.91)。仅将PDAC病例与健康对照进行比较,AUC为0.96(95%置信区间,0.93 - 0.99),敏感性为0.84(95%置信区间,0.73 - 0.93),特异性为0.98(95%置信区间,0.94 - 1.00)。

结论

血浆NGT和CA19-9都能区分PDAC与多样化的对照队列。当这些检测结果联合使用时,准确性进一步提高,显示出有望用于未来的早期检测方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d94/12419019/4ecc3ab2bdb5/mpa-54-e823-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验