• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale.言语失用评定量表的精确操作定义
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 29;34(4S):2519-2532. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00229. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
Treatment for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxia syndromes.弗里德赖希共济失调及其他遗传性共济失调综合征言语障碍的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD008953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008953.pub2.
3
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
4
Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech.儿童言语失用症的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD006278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS-TR) Test for Children With Speech Sound Disorders.土耳其语版运动性言语技能动态评估(DEMSS-TR)测试对语音障碍儿童的有效性和可靠性
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70067. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70067.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and transcultural adaptation of the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale 3.5.Tradução para o português brasileiro e adaptação transcultural da Escala de Avaliação da Aprexia de Fala 3.5.
Codas. 2023 Jun 30;35(3):e20220012. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022012pt. eCollection 2023.
2
The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Utility.言语失用症评定量表:信度、效度和实用性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 9;32(2):469-491. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00148. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
3
The prevalence of apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia after stroke: A bayesian hierarchical analysis.脑卒中后慢性失语症患者中言语失用症的患病率:贝叶斯层次分析。
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
How Do Clinicians Judge Fluency in Aphasia?临床医生如何判断失语症患者的语言流畅性?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Apr 4;65(4):1521-1542. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00484. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Apraxia of speech and the study of speech production impairments: Can we avoid further confusion? Reply to Romani (2021).言语失用症与言语产生障碍的研究:我们能否避免进一步的混淆?对 Romani(2021)的回复。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021 May-Jun;38(4):309-317. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2021.2009790. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
6
Intra- and Interjudge Reliability of the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale in Early Stroke Patients.早期脑卒中患者言语失用评定量表的组内和组间信度。
J Commun Disord. 2021 Jan-Feb;89:106076. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106076. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults: A Scoping Review.儿童和成人言语失用症的鉴别诊断:一项范围综述
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):2952-2994. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00061. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
Apraxia of speech involves lesions of dorsal arcuate fasciculus and insula in patients with aphasia.言语失用症在失语症患者中涉及背侧弓状束和岛叶的损伤。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;10(2):162-169. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000699.
9
Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia.言语失用症和失语症患者的辅音产生的知觉特征。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1411-1431. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0169. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale 3.0: Application With Persons With Acquired Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia.言语失用评定量表3.0的评分者间信度和同时效度:在获得性言语失用和失语症患者中的应用
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jul 15;28(2S):895-904. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-MSC18-18-0099.

言语失用评定量表的精确操作定义

Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale.

作者信息

Mailend Marja-Liisa, Jacks Adam, Haley Katarina L

机构信息

Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Special Education and Speech Therapy, University of Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 29;34(4S):2519-2532. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00229. Epub 2025 May 22.

DOI:10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00229
PMID:40403407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12334293/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS; Strand et al., 2014) has quickly emerged as a standard for apraxia of speech (AOS) diagnosis in stroke despite mixed evidence. The purpose of this study was to analyze, clarify, and revise the scoring procedures and item definitions of the ASRS as a preliminary step for investigating the scale's psychometric properties in stroke.

METHOD

We evaluated the interpretation of the ASRS items and scale procedures by independently rating the video and audio examples provided with the latest dissemination of the ASRS. Discrepancies in ratings were discussed after each rating.

RESULTS

Upon discussing the rating discrepancies, our team identified barriers to using the scale, including lack of clear operational definitions for the scale items, difficulties with applying the multidimensional rating scale, mismatch between the scale description and item description, and lack of detailed procedures for applying the scale. Based on this analysis, we developed a series of rules for scoring the ASRS in our own research applications with stroke survivors. We also clarified scale labels and operationalized definitions for most of the scale items.

CONCLUSIONS

Several potential concerns for reliable use of the ASRS were identified and addressed by clarifying the scale procedures and item definitions. We plan to use the updated procedures and definitions in research applications and are sharing them here for further input and potential applications from the research community. Research is needed to evaluate the impact of the changes on diagnostic classification and severity estimation for AOS.

摘要

目的

尽管证据不一,但言语失用评定量表(ASRS;斯特兰德等人,2014年)已迅速成为中风后言语失用(AOS)诊断的标准。本研究的目的是分析、澄清和修订ASRS的评分程序及项目定义,作为调查该量表在中风患者中心理测量特性的初步步骤。

方法

我们通过对ASRS最新版本所提供的视频和音频示例进行独立评分,来评估ASRS项目及量表程序的解读情况。每次评分后讨论评分差异。

结果

在讨论评分差异时,我们的团队确定了使用该量表的障碍,包括量表项目缺乏明确的操作定义、应用多维评定量表存在困难、量表描述与项目描述不匹配以及缺乏应用该量表的详细程序。基于此分析,我们制定了一系列规则,用于在我们自己对中风幸存者的研究应用中对ASRS进行评分。我们还明确了量表标签,并对大多数量表项目进行了操作性定义。

结论

通过澄清量表程序和项目定义,确定并解决了可靠使用ASRS的几个潜在问题。我们计划在研究应用中使用更新后的程序和定义,并在此分享,以供研究界进一步参考和潜在应用。需要开展研究以评估这些变化对AOS诊断分类和严重程度估计的影响。