Mailend Marja-Liisa, Jacks Adam, Haley Katarina L
Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Special Education and Speech Therapy, University of Tartu, Estonia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 29;34(4S):2519-2532. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00229. Epub 2025 May 22.
The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS; Strand et al., 2014) has quickly emerged as a standard for apraxia of speech (AOS) diagnosis in stroke despite mixed evidence. The purpose of this study was to analyze, clarify, and revise the scoring procedures and item definitions of the ASRS as a preliminary step for investigating the scale's psychometric properties in stroke.
We evaluated the interpretation of the ASRS items and scale procedures by independently rating the video and audio examples provided with the latest dissemination of the ASRS. Discrepancies in ratings were discussed after each rating.
Upon discussing the rating discrepancies, our team identified barriers to using the scale, including lack of clear operational definitions for the scale items, difficulties with applying the multidimensional rating scale, mismatch between the scale description and item description, and lack of detailed procedures for applying the scale. Based on this analysis, we developed a series of rules for scoring the ASRS in our own research applications with stroke survivors. We also clarified scale labels and operationalized definitions for most of the scale items.
Several potential concerns for reliable use of the ASRS were identified and addressed by clarifying the scale procedures and item definitions. We plan to use the updated procedures and definitions in research applications and are sharing them here for further input and potential applications from the research community. Research is needed to evaluate the impact of the changes on diagnostic classification and severity estimation for AOS.
尽管证据不一,但言语失用评定量表(ASRS;斯特兰德等人,2014年)已迅速成为中风后言语失用(AOS)诊断的标准。本研究的目的是分析、澄清和修订ASRS的评分程序及项目定义,作为调查该量表在中风患者中心理测量特性的初步步骤。
我们通过对ASRS最新版本所提供的视频和音频示例进行独立评分,来评估ASRS项目及量表程序的解读情况。每次评分后讨论评分差异。
在讨论评分差异时,我们的团队确定了使用该量表的障碍,包括量表项目缺乏明确的操作定义、应用多维评定量表存在困难、量表描述与项目描述不匹配以及缺乏应用该量表的详细程序。基于此分析,我们制定了一系列规则,用于在我们自己对中风幸存者的研究应用中对ASRS进行评分。我们还明确了量表标签,并对大多数量表项目进行了操作性定义。
通过澄清量表程序和项目定义,确定并解决了可靠使用ASRS的几个潜在问题。我们计划在研究应用中使用更新后的程序和定义,并在此分享,以供研究界进一步参考和潜在应用。需要开展研究以评估这些变化对AOS诊断分类和严重程度估计的影响。