Thang Do Xuan, Hung Nguyen Viet, Anh Vu Tran, Mai Vu Thi Quynh, Thuy Le Thu, Nguyen Cuc Thi Thu, Nguyen Duc Trung, Hung Dang Viet
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Management and Economics, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Office of Academic Affairs, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;13(3):62. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13030062.
The study aimed to investigate the determinants of pharmacy postgraduates' satisfaction to suggest essential recommendations to enhance educational quality at Hanoi University of Pharmacy in Vietnam. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 202 postgraduates using structured questionnaires, with 31 multidimensional questions and 1 question addressing overall satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the questionnaire's internal consistency, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified key factors, and multiple linear regression analysis was applied to assess the impact of these factors. Overall satisfaction had a high mean score of 4.49 out of 5 (SD = 0.602). The final 29 questions were retained and divided into four main factors affecting satisfaction after rotating EFA. The dimension of "Support and Evaluation" was the most influential factor (β = 0.475), followed by "Training Organization", "Facilities and Library", and "Lecturers and Curriculum". The variables with the lowest scores needed much more attention, including digital systems (4.2, SD = 0.852), information technology support (4.32, SD = 0.772), activities boosting lifelong learning skills (4.48, SD = 0.624), and the reasonability of the education program's structure (4.48, SD = 0.608) and the studying program's schedule (4.45, SD = 0.607). The findings indicate the issues that should be addressed, and have highlighted that improvements in electronic library accessibility and updated curricula are also recommended to further optimize the educational experience of postgraduate students.
该研究旨在调查药学研究生满意度的决定因素,以便提出重要建议,以提高越南河内药科大学的教育质量。采用结构化问卷对202名研究生进行了横断面调查,问卷包含31个多维度问题和1个关于总体满意度的问题。使用克朗巴哈系数来评估问卷的内部一致性,探索性因素分析(EFA)确定关键因素,并应用多元线性回归分析来评估这些因素的影响。总体满意度的平均得分较高,满分为5分,平均分为4.49(标准差=0.602)。在进行旋转探索性因素分析后,保留了最后29个问题,并将其分为影响满意度的四个主要因素。“支持与评价”维度是最具影响力的因素(β=0.475),其次是“培训组织”、“设施与图书馆”以及“教师与课程”。得分最低的变量需要更多关注,包括数字系统(4.2,标准差=0.852)、信息技术支持(4.32,标准差=0.772)、促进终身学习技能的活动(4.48,标准差=0.624),以及教育计划结构的合理性(4.48,标准差=0.608)和学习计划的时间表(4.45,标准差=0.607)。研究结果表明了应解决的问题,并强调建议改善电子图书馆的可访问性和更新课程,以进一步优化研究生的教育体验。