• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四个NBA篮球赛季中的社会失误后适应情况。

Social post-error adaptations across four NBA basketball seasons.

作者信息

Denul Ayala, Pourtois Gilles, Loeys Tom, Notebaert Wim

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02006-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-02006-x
PMID:40410259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12102261/
Abstract

Error monitoring, a crucial aspect of behavioral regulation, has been studied extensively in cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Lab studies often observe that people become more cautious after both own and others' errors. Moreover, social error monitoring research suggests that cooperation elicits stronger adaptations to others' errors than competition. However, these insights primarily stem from controlled reaction time tasks, limiting generalization to real-world social settings. To address this, we investigated whether basketball players become more cautious after missing compared to making shots, and whether these adaptations differ when the miss was by themselves, teammates or opponents. Meta-analyses of four NBA-seasons revealed increased caution in terms of shot distance and angle following missed compared to made shots, with the most pronounced effect after own, next teammates' and last opponents' errors. While controlling for rebound shots reduced the effects, the general pattern remained. Additional analyses also revealed a positive correlation between post-error caution and accuracy, suggesting post-error caution may serve to improve shooting accuracy. These findings not only extend cognitive theories from controlled settings to a real-word sport setting, but also provide a crucial understanding of athletes' social error responses thereby paving the way for research aimed at optimizing this aspect of performance.

摘要

错误监测作为行为调节的一个关键方面,在认知心理学和神经科学领域已得到广泛研究。实验室研究经常观察到,人们在自己和他人犯错后都会变得更加谨慎。此外,社会错误监测研究表明,与竞争相比,合作会引发对他人错误更强烈的适应性反应。然而,这些见解主要源于受控的反应时间任务,限制了其对现实世界社会环境的推广。为解决这一问题,我们研究了篮球运动员投篮未中后是否比命中后变得更加谨慎,以及当未中是由自己、队友还是对手造成时,这些适应性反应是否存在差异。对四个NBA赛季的荟萃分析显示,与命中投篮相比,投篮未中后在投篮距离和角度方面的谨慎程度有所增加,自己犯错后的影响最为明显,其次是队友犯错,最后是对手犯错。虽然控制补篮会降低这种影响,但总体模式仍然存在。进一步分析还揭示了错误后谨慎程度与准确性之间的正相关关系,表明错误后谨慎可能有助于提高投篮准确性。这些发现不仅将认知理论从受控环境扩展到了现实世界的运动环境,还为理解运动员对社会错误的反应提供了关键依据,从而为旨在优化这一表现方面的研究铺平了道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/8cb8d552bb1d/41598_2025_2006_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/4e5474314e2e/41598_2025_2006_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/b6dbf8e6b15a/41598_2025_2006_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/8cb8d552bb1d/41598_2025_2006_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/4e5474314e2e/41598_2025_2006_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/b6dbf8e6b15a/41598_2025_2006_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db3/12102261/8cb8d552bb1d/41598_2025_2006_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Social post-error adaptations across four NBA basketball seasons.四个NBA篮球赛季中的社会失误后适应情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02006-x.
2
"I'm pretty sure that we will win!": The influence of score-related nonverbal behavioral changes on the confidence in winning a basketball game.“我非常确定我们会赢!”:与比分相关的非言语行为变化对赢得篮球比赛信心的影响。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014 Jun;36(3):316-20. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0199.
3
The effects of sport expertise and shot results on basketball players' action anticipation.运动专长和投篮结果对篮球运动员动作预判的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):e0227521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227521. eCollection 2020.
4
Association between late-night tweeting and next-day game performance among professional basketball players.职业篮球运动员深夜发推与次日比赛表现的关联性研究。
Sleep Health. 2019 Feb;5(1):68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
5
Perceived hotness affects behavior of basketball players and coaches.热感知会影响篮球运动员和教练的行为。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1151-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797612468452. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
6
Effects of Early Sport Specialization on Injury Load Management and Athletic Success of National Basketball Association Players.早期专项运动对美国职业篮球联赛球员伤病负荷管理及竞技成绩的影响
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jan 3;13(1):23259671241304732. doi: 10.1177/23259671241304732. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
The effect of perceived streakiness on the shot-taking behaviour of basketball players.感知到的连续性对篮球运动员投篮行为的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(7):647-54. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.982205. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
8
The Effects of Playing Multiple High School Sports on National Basketball Association Players' Propensity for Injury and Athletic Performance.《多项高中体育运动对美国国家篮球协会球员受伤倾向和运动表现的影响》。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):402-408. doi: 10.1177/0363546517738736. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
9
Impacts of mental fatigue and sport specific film sessions on basketball shooting tasks.精神疲劳和特定运动影片训练对篮球投篮任务的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Aug;23(8):1500-1508. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2161421. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
10
Goal-directed self-talk used to self-regulate in male basketball competitions.用于在男子篮球比赛中自我调节的目标导向的自我对话。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jun;37(12):1429-1433. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1561967. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Error observation as a window on performance monitoring in social contexts? A systematic review.错误观察:社会情境下绩效监测的窗口?一项系统综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Apr;147:105077. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105077. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.理解团队运动中运动员的决策过程:实证证据的系统综述
Sports (Basel). 2021 May 17;9(5):65. doi: 10.3390/sports9050065.
3
Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
干扰分数的同时效度和聚合效度不足:我们是否应该停止使用侧抑制任务、西蒙任务和空间 Stroop 任务?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Feb 13;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-0207-y.
4
Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.冲突监测与情感信号假说——综合述评。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):193-216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9.
5
The influence of fatigue on decision-making in athletes: a systematic review.疲劳对运动员决策的影响:系统评价。
Sports Biomech. 2020 Feb;19(1):76-89. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1472798. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
An adaptive orienting theory of error processing.一种自适应定向错误处理理论。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Mar;55(3). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13041. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Strategy Changes After Errors Improve Performance.错误后改变策略可提高绩效。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 12;6:2051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02051. eCollection 2015.
8
"Hand down, man down." Analysis of defensive adjustments in response to the hot hand in basketball using novel defense metrics.“手感来了,人就来了。”运用新颖的防守指标分析篮球比赛中针对火热手感的防守调整。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e114184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114184. eCollection 2014.
9
The effect of perceived streakiness on the shot-taking behaviour of basketball players.感知到的连续性对篮球运动员投篮行为的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(7):647-54. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.982205. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
10
Erroneous and correct actions have a different affective valence: evidence from ERPs.错误和正确的动作具有不同的情感效价:来自 ERP 的证据。
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):960-73. doi: 10.1037/a0032808. Epub 2013 Jun 24.