Gravert Christina, Mormann Milica
Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Marketing, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, USA.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):18035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01800-x.
Food waste is a serious problem affecting both global food security and climate change. Using a large-scale field experiment with data from 43,246 perishable vegetable purchases from eight supermarkets, we show that in-store offers lead to over-purchasing of food items and result in an increase in household food waste. Shoppers exposed to multi-unit offers (e.g., "2 for $5" or two-for-one pricing) purchase greater food quantities compared to those exposed to a single-unit discounts (e.g., "$2.50, regular price $2.89" or "50% off"). A follow-up survey shows that these additional items are subsequently less likely to be consumed, leading to an increase in household food waste. A complementary online survey provides further support for these results. Importantly, as a part of the field experiment, we test two strategies that can address in-store over-purchasing. Taken together, the current findings provide important insights into factors that increase over-purchasing and household food waste, as well as strategies that can help overcome them. We thus demonstrate how retailers can negatively, but also positively, impact important societal and environmental causes.
食物浪费是一个严重的问题,影响着全球粮食安全和气候变化。通过一项大规模实地实验,利用从八家超市购买43246件易腐蔬菜的数据,我们发现店内促销会导致食品过度购买,并导致家庭食物浪费增加。与那些享受单品折扣(例如,“2.5美元,原价2.89美元”或“五折”)的购物者相比,接触多件商品优惠(例如,“5美元两件”或买一送一价格)的购物者会购买更多数量的食品。一项后续调查显示,这些额外购买的商品随后被消费的可能性较小,从而导致家庭食物浪费增加。一项补充性在线调查为这些结果提供了进一步支持。重要的是,作为实地实验的一部分,我们测试了两种可以解决店内过度购买问题的策略。综合来看,当前的研究结果为增加过度购买和家庭食物浪费的因素以及有助于克服这些因素的策略提供了重要见解。因此,我们展示了零售商如何对重要的社会和环境问题产生负面影响,但也能产生积极影响。