Suppr超能文献

酰胺类和酯类局部麻醉药血管活性的比较:一项皮内研究

Comparison of the vasoactivity of amide and ester local anaesthetics. An intradermal study.

作者信息

Willatts D G, Reynolds F

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1985 Oct;57(10):1006-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.10.1006.

Abstract

The vascular effects and duration of action of two ester-linked local anaesthetics, procaine and amethocaine, and four amide-linked local anaesthetics, cinchocaine, lignocaine, mepivacaine and prilocaine, were investigated in 10 volunteers by intradermal injection using a double-blind technique. Procaine and amethocaine produced marked vasodilatation; weal formation was observed at 80% of the amethocaine injection sites. Mepivacaine had a marked vasoconstrictor effect; the other three agents produced more variable vasoactivity. Duration of action was concentration-dependent for all six drugs, the slopes of the log dose--duration plots reflecting the observed vasoactivity.

摘要

采用双盲技术,对10名志愿者进行皮内注射,研究了两种酯类局部麻醉药(普鲁卡因和丁卡因)以及四种酰胺类局部麻醉药(辛可卡因、利多卡因、甲哌卡因和丙胺卡因)的血管效应和作用持续时间。普鲁卡因和丁卡因可产生明显的血管扩张;在丁卡因注射部位的80%观察到风团形成。甲哌卡因有明显的血管收缩作用;其他三种药物产生的血管活性变化更大。所有六种药物的作用持续时间均呈浓度依赖性,对数剂量-作用持续时间图的斜率反映了观察到的血管活性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验