Diaz Keith M, Murdock Margaret E, Clark Adriana Wu, Kumar Sitara, Jerez Victor, Serafini Maria A, Xu Chang, Boudreaux Benjamin D, Romero Emily K, Aguirre Jennifer, Seid Heather, Nandakumar Renu, Ginsberg Henry, Shimbo Daichi, Cheung Ying Kuen
Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street PH9-301, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Bionutrition Research Core, Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 25;25(1):1929. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22250-0.
Excessive sedentary behavior is highly prevalent in developed nations and is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. As such, health agencies have provided general recommendations to "sit less, move more" by interspersing brief periods of activity. However, a lack of empirical evidence describing how often (e.g. every 30 min, every 60 min) and for how long (e.g., 1 min activity bouts, 5 min activity bouts) sedentary time should be interrupted (a "sedentary break") to yield health benefit has precluded more quantitative, actionable guidelines. To date, rigorous and methodical dose escalation experiments have not been conducted to elucidate effective and tolerated sedentary break doses. The objective of the proposed study is to determine the minimally effective dose (e.g., the lowest dose) for two elements of a sedentary break (frequency and duration) that yields improvements in established CVD risk factors. The maximally tolerated dose (e.g. the highest dose that does not cause undue physical/psychological distress) for both frequency and duration of sedentary breaks will also be determined.
This study is a randomized crossover trial conducted under laboratory conditions among 324 adults without chronic medical conditions. Participants complete two trial conditions (8 h each), a sedentary break (intervention) condition and an uninterrupted sitting (control) condition, in a randomized order. The sedentary break condition consists of 1 of 25 possible frequency/duration combinations (e.g. walk every 30 min for 5 min), selected according to a Bayesian adaptive randomization method. Primary outcomes used to inform the adaptive randomization are glucose and blood pressure serially assessed over each trial condition. Constructs of dose toxicity (tolerability, safety, physical exhaustion/fatigue, and affect) are also serially assessed.
This study will elucidate the minimally effective and maximally tolerated frequency and duration of a sedentary break that yields improvements in established CVD risk factors, information important for the development of quantitative sedentary behavior guidelines.
This trial has been registered with the Clinical Trials Registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health on April 29, 2022. The registration ID is NCT05353322.
久坐行为过多在发达国家极为普遍,是心血管疾病(CVD)发病和死亡的一个风险因素。因此,卫生机构已给出一般性建议,即通过穿插短暂活动时间来“少坐多动”。然而,缺乏实证证据来描述久坐时间应每隔多久(例如每30分钟、每60分钟)以及持续多长时间(例如1分钟的活动时段、5分钟的活动时段)进行一次打断(“久坐中断”)才能产生健康益处,这使得更具量化性、可操作的指南难以制定。迄今为止,尚未进行过严谨且系统的剂量递增实验来阐明有效且可耐受的久坐中断剂量。拟开展研究的目的是确定久坐中断的两个要素(频率和时长)的最小有效剂量(例如最低剂量),该剂量能改善既定的心血管疾病风险因素。同时还将确定久坐中断频率和时长的最大耐受剂量(例如不会导致过度身体/心理不适的最高剂量)。
本研究是一项在实验室条件下针对324名无慢性疾病的成年人开展的随机交叉试验。参与者按随机顺序完成两种试验条件(各8小时),即久坐中断(干预)条件和不间断坐立(对照)条件。久坐中断条件由25种可能的频率/时长组合中的一种(例如每30分钟步行5分钟)组成,根据贝叶斯自适应随机化方法进行选择。用于指导自适应随机化的主要结局指标是在每个试验条件下连续评估的血糖和血压。还会连续评估剂量毒性的各项指标(耐受性、安全性、身体疲惫/疲劳以及情感状况)。
本研究将阐明能改善既定心血管疾病风险因素的久坐中断的最小有效频率和时长以及最大耐受频率和时长,这些信息对于制定量化的久坐行为指南至关重要。
本试验已于2022年4月29日在美国国立卫生研究院国家医学图书馆维护的临床试验注册库进行注册。注册号为NCT05353322。