Duran Andrea T, Friel Ciaran P, Serafini Maria A, Ensari Ipek, Cheung Ying Kuen, Diaz Keith M
Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 May 1;55(5):847-855. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003109. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Sedentary time is ubiquitous in developed nations and is associated with deleterious health outcomes. Physical activity guidelines recommend reductions in sedentary time; however, quantitative guidelines that inform how often and how long sedentary time should be interrupted have not been provided. The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of multiple doses of a sedentary break intervention on cardiometabolic risk factors, concurrently evaluating efficacy of varying frequencies and durations of sedentary breaks.
In a randomized crossover study, middle- and older-age adults ( n = 11) completed the following 8-h conditions on five separate days: 1 uninterrupted sedentary (control) condition and four acute (experimental) trials that entailed different sedentary break frequency/duration combinations: every 30 min for 1 min, every 30 min for 5 min, every 60 min for 1 min, and every 60 min for 5 min. Sedentary breaks entailed light-intensity walking. Glucose and blood pressure (BP) were measured every 15 and 60 min, respectively.
Compared with control, glucose incremental area under the curve was significantly attenuated only for the every 30 min for 5-min dose (-11.8[4.7]; P = 0.017). All sedentary break doses yielded significant net decreases in systolic BP from baseline compared with control ( P < 0.05). The largest reductions in systolic BP were observed for the every 60 min for 1 min (-5.2 [1.4] mm Hg) and every 30 min for 5 min (-4.3[1.4] mm Hg) doses.
The present study provides important information concerning efficacious sedentary break doses. Higher-frequency and longer-duration breaks (every 30 min for 5 min) should be considered when targeting glycemic responses, whereas lower doses may be sufficient for BP lowering.
久坐时间在发达国家普遍存在,且与有害健康结果相关。身体活动指南建议减少久坐时间;然而,尚未提供关于久坐时间应多久以及多长时间中断一次的定量指南。本研究的目的是检验多次久坐中断干预剂量对心血管代谢危险因素的急性影响,同时评估不同频率和时长的久坐中断的效果。
在一项随机交叉研究中,中老年成年人(n = 11)在五个不同的日子里完成了以下8小时的情况:1个不间断久坐(对照)情况和四个急性(实验)试验,这些试验涉及不同的久坐中断频率/时长组合:每30分钟1分钟、每30分钟5分钟、每60分钟1分钟和每60分钟5分钟。久坐中断包括轻度强度的步行。分别每15分钟和60分钟测量一次血糖和血压(BP)。
与对照相比,仅每30分钟5分钟的剂量使曲线下葡萄糖增量面积显著降低(-11.8[4.7];P = 0.017)。与对照相比,所有久坐中断剂量均使收缩压从基线显著净下降(P < 0.05)。每60分钟1分钟(-5.2 [1.4] mmHg)和每30分钟5分钟(-4.3[1.4] mmHg)剂量的收缩压下降最大。
本研究提供了关于有效久坐中断剂量的重要信息。针对血糖反应时应考虑更高频率和更长时长的中断(每30分钟5分钟),而较低剂量可能足以降低血压。