Wang Zuopeng, Qi Kai, Zhang Pengxia
Physical Education College, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, 154007, China.
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, 80-336, Poland.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 26;37(1):169. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03065-w.
This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess whether physical activity (PA) can improve physical health(PH) and mental health(MH) in elderly.
To conduct this meta-analysis, four databases were searched from the start to October 24, 2024 (Web of Science and PubMed in English, CNKI and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform in Chinese). Eligibility criteria included (1) study populations aged ≥ 60 years of normal elderly, with no gender restrictions; (2) the experimental group included PA interventions; (3) the control group consisted of non-PA interventions or usual activities; (4) assessment results from health evaluation tools and psychological scales; (5) the research design was a controlled experimental study. The Cochrane bias risk tool was used to assess the quality of evidence for each study. Among 4,151 potential related articles, 9 met the criteria for inclusion in this review.
The PA intervention shows a high degree of statistical heterogeneity in the overall results for the PH of the elderly (I²=93.8%, p < 0.01). The effect size of the PA intervention on the PH of the elderly is 0.86 (95% CI: 0.08, 1.64), which is statistically significant. Subgroup analysis showed that in intervention frequency, the heterogeneity for interventions less than three times per week is low (I² = 25.6%); in intervention duration, interventions lasting less than 30 min is relatively high, the direction of the study results is quite consistent. The overall effect size is 2.32 (CI: 1.45, 3.20), indicating statistical significance; in overall intervention duration, the overall effect size for interventions lasting less than 12 weeks is (CI: 0.08, 1.59), while the effect sizes for the other two subgroups include 0, indicating non-significant results. The overall results for the MH of the elderly also exhibit a high degree of statistical heterogeneity (I²=95.3%, p < 0.01). The effect size of the PA intervention on the MH of the elderly is -0.22 (95% CI: -1.46, 1.03), which is not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis also showed no statistically significant differences. The PH and MH of the elderly may potentially improve through PA interventions, although further research is needed to clarify whether these benefits hold clinical significance beyond statistical significance.
PA interventions with a frequency of less than 3 times per week, each session lasting less than 30 min, and a total duration not exceeding 12 weeks may be more effective in improving the PH of the elderly. This study did not identify the optimal dosage for improving the MH of the elderly. These findings highlight the potential benefits of PA for PH in the elderly but underscore the need for more rigorous studies to determine optimal intervention parameters and to explore the clinical significance of PA for both PH and MH.
本荟萃分析旨在系统评估体育活动(PA)是否能改善老年人的身体健康(PH)和心理健康(MH)。
为进行本荟萃分析,检索了四个数据库,时间跨度从建库至2024年10月24日(英文数据库为Web of Science和PubMed,中文数据库为中国知网和万方数据知识服务平台)。纳入标准包括:(1)研究人群为年龄≥60岁的正常老年人,无性别限制;(2)实验组包括PA干预措施;(3)对照组由非PA干预措施或日常活动组成;(4)来自健康评估工具和心理量表的评估结果;(5)研究设计为对照实验研究。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估每项研究的证据质量。在4151篇潜在相关文章中,有9篇符合纳入本综述的标准。
PA干预在老年人PH的总体结果中显示出高度的统计学异质性(I² = 93.8%,p < 0.01)。PA干预对老年人PH的效应量为0.86(95%CI:0.08,1.64),具有统计学意义。亚组分析表明,在干预频率方面,每周少于三次的干预异质性较低(I² = 25.6%);在干预持续时间方面,持续时间少于30分钟的干预异质性相对较高,研究结果方向较为一致。总体效应量为2.32(CI:1.45,3.20),具有统计学意义;在总体干预持续时间方面,持续时间少于12周的干预总体效应量为(CI:0.08,1.59),而其他两个亚组的效应量为0,表明结果无统计学意义。老年人MH的总体结果也显示出高度的统计学异质性(I² = 95.3%,p < 0.01)。PA干预对老年人MH的效应量为 -0.22(95%CI: -1.46,1.03),无统计学意义。亚组分析也未显示出统计学显著差异。尽管需要进一步研究以阐明这些益处是否具有超出统计学意义的临床意义,但老年人的PH和MH可能通过PA干预得到潜在改善。
每周频率少于3次、每次持续时间少于30分钟且总持续时间不超过12周的PA干预可能在改善老年人PH方面更有效。本研究未确定改善老年人MH的最佳剂量。这些发现凸显了PA对老年人PH的潜在益处,但强调需要更严格的研究来确定最佳干预参数,并探索PA对PH和MH的临床意义。