• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

字里行间:法律意识与消费者对在线体育博彩的认知

Between the Lines: Legal Consciousness and Consumer Perceptions of Online Sports Betting.

作者信息

Mastromartino Brandon, Li Weizhe, Qian Yizhou Tyreal

机构信息

Institute on Sports Wagering and Gaming, L. Robert Payne School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, San Diego State University, 550 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA, 92115, USA.

School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, 1250 Huey P. Long Field House, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10394-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-025-10394-y
PMID:40418311
Abstract

This study investigates how perceived legality of online sports betting influences perceptions of consumer protection, behavioral control, and future betting intentions. Employing general linear modeling (GLM) and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analyses (fsQCA), we assess these relationships across different types of online betting activities and among varying levels of betting experience. Results revealed that participants who perceived online sports betting as legal reported higher levels of perceived consumer protection, perceived behavioral control, and future betting intentions. The fsQCA identified specific configurations leading to high future betting intentions. Notably, two configurations emerged: (1) bettors who perceive betting as legal, participate in Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS), and have high perceived behavioral control; and (2) bettors involved in prop pick'em wagering with high perceived consumer protection and high perceived behavioral control. This study highlights the importance of perceived legality, consumer protection, and behavioral control in shaping consumer perceptions and intentions with online sports betting. The identification of specific factor combinations suggests that regulatory and policy efforts should consider the multifaceted nature of consumer behavior in online sports betting. Tailored strategies that enhance legal consciousness, strengthen consumer protection measures, and empower bettors can more effectively promote responsible gaming practices.

摘要

本研究调查了在线体育博彩的合法性认知如何影响消费者保护认知、行为控制认知以及未来博彩意图。我们采用一般线性模型(GLM)和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA),评估了不同类型在线博彩活动以及不同博彩经验水平下的这些关系。结果显示,认为在线体育博彩合法的参与者报告的消费者保护认知、行为控制认知和未来博彩意图水平更高。fsQCA确定了导致高未来博彩意图的特定组合。值得注意的是,出现了两种组合:(1)认为博彩合法、参与日常梦幻体育(DFS)且行为控制认知高的投注者;(2)参与让分胜负投注且消费者保护认知高和行为控制认知高的投注者。本研究强调了合法性认知、消费者保护和行为控制在塑造消费者对在线体育博彩的认知和意图方面的重要性。特定因素组合的识别表明,监管和政策努力应考虑在线体育博彩中消费者行为的多面性。增强法律意识、加强消费者保护措施并赋予投注者权力的定制策略可以更有效地促进负责任的博彩行为。

相似文献

1
Between the Lines: Legal Consciousness and Consumer Perceptions of Online Sports Betting.字里行间:法律意识与消费者对在线体育博彩的认知
J Gambl Stud. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10394-y.
2
Changes to the playing field: A contemporary study of actual European online sports betting.赛场的变化:对欧洲在线体育博彩实际情况的当代研究。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Jun 30;10(3):396-411. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00029.
3
Wagering Advertisements and Inducements: Exposure and Perceived Influence on Betting Behaviour.博彩广告和诱因:对博彩行为的暴露和感知影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):793-811. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-09823-y.
4
Can Positive Social Perception and Reduced Stigma be a Problem in Sports Betting? A Qualitative Focus Group Study with Spanish Sports Bettors Undergoing Treatment for Gambling Disorder.积极的社会认知和减少污名将成为体育博彩的问题吗?对西班牙接受赌博障碍治疗的体育博彩者进行定性焦点小组研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):571-585. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9799-2.
5
The impact of exposure to wagering advertisements and inducements on intended and actual betting expenditure: An ecological momentary assessment study.接触博彩广告和诱惑对预期和实际博彩支出的影响:一项生态瞬间评估研究。
J Behav Addict. 2019 Mar 1;8(1):146-156. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.10. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Who makes in-play bets? Investigating the demographics, psychological characteristics, and gambling-related harms of in-play sports bettors.谁进行即场投注?研究即场体育博彩者的人口统计学、心理特征和与赌博相关的危害。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Jun 19;12(2):547-556. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00030. Print 2023 Jun 29.
7
Gambling Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among European Regular Sports Bettors: An Empirical Study Using Behavioral Tracking Data.欧洲常规体育投注者在新冠疫情之前及期间的赌博行为:一项基于行为跟踪数据的实证研究
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023;21(1):20-27. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00327-8. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Does the uptake of wagering inducements predict impulse betting on sport?博彩诱惑的接受程度是否预示着对体育博彩的冲动投注?
J Behav Addict. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):146-157. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.17. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
Feature preferences of sports betting platforms: A discrete choice experiment shows why young bettors prefer smartphones.体育博彩平台的功能偏好:离散选择实验揭示了年轻博彩者为何偏爱智能手机。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Jan 9;13(1):134-145. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00073. Print 2024 Mar 26.
10
What's the Message? A Content Analysis of Emails and Texts Received from Wagering Operators During Sports and Racing Events.信息是什么?对体育和赛马赛事期间从博彩运营商处收到的电子邮件和短信的内容分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Dec;36(4):1107-1121. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09896-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Sports Gambling Intention Comparison Between Males and Females in the United States.美国男女性别之间的体育博彩意向比较。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):937-955. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10259-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
2
Sports entrepreneurship during COVID-19: Technology as an ally to maintain the competitiveness of small businesses.新冠疫情期间的体育创业:技术作为维持小企业竞争力的助力
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023 Feb;187:122256. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122256. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Sports betting around the world: A systematic review.
全球体育博彩:系统综述。
J Behav Addict. 2022 Sep 5;11(3):689-715. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00064. Print 2022 Sep 26.
4
Are esports bettors a new generation of harmed gamblers? A comparison with sports bettors on gambling involvement, problems, and harm.电子竞技博彩者是新一代受伤害的赌徒吗?与体育博彩者在赌博参与度、问题和危害方面的比较。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Aug 13;10(3):435-446. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00039.
5
Differences between Gamblers and Non-Gamblers on Sports Betting Websites.体育博彩网站中赌徒和非赌徒的差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Sep;38(3):753-766. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10065-8. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Recollected usage of legal youth gambling products: Comparisons between adult gamblers and non-gamblers in the UK and Australia.合法青少年赌博产品的回忆性使用情况:英国和澳大利亚成年赌徒与非赌徒的比较。
Addict Behav. 2021 Mar;114:106685. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106685. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Why Some Sports Bettors Think Gambling Addiction Prevented Them from Becoming Winners? A Qualitative Approach to Understanding the Role of Knowledge in Sports Betting Products.为什么有些体育博彩者认为赌博成瘾阻止了他们成为赢家?理解体育博彩产品中知识作用的定性方法。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Sep;36(3):903-920. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09944-3.
8
Effectiveness of At-Risk Gamblers' Temporary Self-Exclusion from Internet Gambling Sites.有风险赌徒临时自我排除互联网赌博网站的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):601-615. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9782-y.
9
The Structural Features of Sports and Race Betting Inducements: Issues for Harm Minimisation and Consumer Protection.体育和赛马博彩诱因的结构特征:危害最小化与消费者保护问题
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Jun;33(2):685-704. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9642-6.
10
Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling.赌博场所自我排除干预法对赌博问题的影响综述
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):229-51. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0.