• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有风险赌徒临时自我排除互联网赌博网站的效果。

Effectiveness of At-Risk Gamblers' Temporary Self-Exclusion from Internet Gambling Sites.

机构信息

Addictology and Psychiatry Department, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.

INSERM, SPHERE U1246 «Biostatistics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Human Science Research», Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):601-615. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9782-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-018-9782-y
PMID:29974308
Abstract

To prevent risks associated with online gambling, many jurisdictions propose self-exclusion strategies as a part of a responsible gambling policy. To protect online gamblers, French law provides for a 7-day temporary non-reducible and voluntary self-exclusion measure that applies only to select websites. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this self-exclusion measure for at-risk online gamblers. It was an experimental randomized controlled trial targeted at risk prevention. The main outcomes were the money wagered and time spent gambling assessed 15 days (short-term) and 2 months (medium-term) after the implementation of the self-exclusion measure. The effectiveness of self-exclusion was also compared according to the gambling type (pure chance games, such as lottery or scratch tickets, skill and chance bank games such as sports betting or horserace betting, and skill and chance games such as poker). Sixty participants were randomly assigned to the experimental condition (n = 30; with the implementation of a self-exclusion measure) or control condition (n = 30). The randomization was stratified according to their favorite game [pure chance games (n = 20), skill and chance bank games (n = 20), and skill and chance social games (n = 20)]. The results revealed that self-exclusion had no short-term impact-but did have a medium-term impact-on gambling habits. After 2 months, the gambling-related cognitions ("illusion of control" and "the perceived inability to stop gambling") and the subscale "desire" of the Gambling Craving Scale (GACS) have decreased. Participants' opinions about the impact and effectiveness of self-exclusion were discussed. To conclude, it appeared that temporary self-exclusion is an interesting tool to protect online gamblers from excessive practices, but several modifications have to be made to improve its effectiveness and use.

摘要

为了防范与线上赌博相关的风险,许多司法管辖区提出自我排除策略,将其作为负责任赌博政策的一部分。为了保护线上赌客,法国法律规定了一项为期 7 天的不可减少的、自愿性的临时自我排除措施,仅适用于特定网站。本研究的目的是评估这种自我排除措施对有风险的线上赌客的有效性。这是一项针对风险预防的实验性随机对照试验。主要结果是在实施自我排除措施后 15 天(短期)和 2 个月(中期)评估的下注金额和赌博时间。还根据赌博类型(纯机会游戏,如彩票或刮刮卡,技能和机会银行游戏,如体育投注或赛马投注,以及技能和机会游戏,如扑克)比较了自我排除的效果。共有 60 名参与者被随机分配到实验组(n=30;实施自我排除措施)或对照组(n=30)。随机分组根据他们最喜欢的游戏进行分层[纯机会游戏(n=20)、技能和机会银行游戏(n=20)和技能和机会社交游戏(n=20)]。结果表明,自我排除在短期内没有影响,但在中期对赌博习惯有影响。2 个月后,赌博相关认知(“控制错觉”和“认为无法停止赌博”)和赌博渴望量表(GACS)的“欲望”分量表下降。参与者对自我排除的影响和有效性的意见进行了讨论。总之,临时自我排除似乎是保护线上赌客免受过度行为的有效工具,但需要进行一些修改以提高其有效性和使用效果。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of At-Risk Gamblers' Temporary Self-Exclusion from Internet Gambling Sites.有风险赌徒临时自我排除互联网赌博网站的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):601-615. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9782-y.
2
Online gambling's moderators: how effective? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在线赌博的监管者:效果如何?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 30;15:519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1846-7.
3
Impact of Warning Pop-Up Messages on the Gambling Behavior, Craving, and Cognitions of Online Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.警告弹出消息对在线赌徒赌博行为、渴望及认知的影响:一项随机对照试验
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 23;12:711431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711431. eCollection 2021.
4
Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.病理性赌博者和偏好机会或技巧游戏的非病理性赌博者在认知扭曲方面的差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Dec;26(4):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6.
5
Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of Internet gamblers.虚拟世界中的现实界限:网络赌博者的自我限制行为
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Dec;24(4):463-77. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9106-8. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
6
Virtual addictions: An examination of problematic social casino game use among at-risk gamblers.虚拟成瘾:对高危赌徒中存在问题的社交赌场游戏使用情况的调查。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:334-339. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Modeling Early Gambling Behavior Using Indicators from Online Lottery Gambling Tracking Data: Longitudinal Analysis.使用在线彩票赌博追踪数据中的指标对早期赌博行为进行建模:纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 12;22(8):e17675. doi: 10.2196/17675.
8
Typology of online lotteries and scratch games gamblers' behaviours: A multilevel latent class cluster analysis applied to player account-based gambling data.在线彩票和刮刮乐赌徒行为的类型学:基于玩家账户赌博数据的多层次潜在类别聚类分析。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;27(4):e1746. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1746. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Overtime: Long-Term Betting Trajectories Among Highly-Involved and Less-Involved Online Sports Bettors.加班:高参与度和低参与度在线体育投注者的长期投注轨迹
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1245-1270. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10294-7. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
10
Self-Exclusion among Online Poker Gamblers: Effects on Expenditure in Time and Money as Compared to Matched Controls.网络扑克赌徒的自我排除:与匹配对照相比,在时间和金钱上的支出影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4399. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224399.

引用本文的文献

1
Between the Lines: Legal Consciousness and Consumer Perceptions of Online Sports Betting.字里行间:法律意识与消费者对在线体育博彩的认知
J Gambl Stud. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10394-y.
2
Who is Getting the Message? Sociodemographic Factors and Gambling Behavior Associated with Awareness of the Swedish National Self-Exclusion Registry Spelpaus.se.谁收到了这条信息?与瑞典国家自我禁入登记处Spelpaus.se的知晓情况相关的社会人口因素和赌博行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun;41(2):715-733. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10357-9. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Gambling Harm-Minimisation Tools and Their Impact on Gambling Behaviour: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.

本文引用的文献

1
Differential Effects of Formal and Informal Gambling on Symptoms of Problem Gambling During Voluntary Self-Exclusion.自愿性自我排除期间,正式和非正式赌博对问题赌博症状的影响差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Sep;34(3):1013-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9743-5.
2
Gambling transitions among adult gamblers: A multi-state model using a Markovian approach applied to the JEU cohort.成年赌徒的赌博转变:一种应用马尔可夫方法的多状态模型,应用于JEU队列研究。
Addict Behav. 2016 Jun;57:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Breaks in Play: Do They Achieve Intended Aims?
赌博危害最小化工具及其对赌博行为的影响:实证证据综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21080998.
4
Cryptocurrency Trading, Day Trading, and Gambling Behavior: Examining the Moderating Effects of Financially Focused Self-Concept and Gambling Motives.加密货币交易、日内交易与赌博行为:探究以财务为导向的自我概念和赌博动机的调节作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Mar;41(1):67-89. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10343-1. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
5
Psychometric Validation of the Gambling Craving Scale in a Treatment-Seeking Sample.赌博渴望量表在治疗寻求样本中的心理计量学验证。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1761-1778. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10306-6. Epub 2024 May 3.
6
Unmasking Risky Habits: Identifying and Predicting Problem Gamblers Through Machine Learning Techniques.揭开危险习惯的面具:通过机器学习技术识别和预测问题赌徒。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1367-1377. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10297-4. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
7
Effects and Limitations of a Unique, Nationwide, Self-Exclusion Service for Gambling Disorder and Its Self-Perceived Effects and Harms in Gamblers: Protocol for a Qualitative Interview Study.一项针对赌博障碍的独特全国性自我禁入服务及其在赌徒中自我认知的影响和危害的质性访谈研究方案:效果与局限
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 14;12:e47528. doi: 10.2196/47528.
8
Voluntary Self-Exclusion and Contingency Management for the Treatment of Problematic and Harmful Gambling in the UK: An Exploratory Study.英国针对问题性和有害赌博治疗的自愿自我排除与应急管理:一项探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;11(19):2682. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192682.
9
Nationwide, Multioperator Self-Exclusion and Psychiatric Comorbidity in Patients with Gambling Disorder: A Retrospective Chart Review Study from a Regional Treatment Unit.全国范围内,赌博障碍患者的多运营商自我排除与精神疾病共病:一项来自地区治疗单位的回顾性图表审查研究。
J Addict. 2023 Sep 28;2023:5532259. doi: 10.1155/2023/5532259. eCollection 2023.
10
The Efficacy of Voluntary Self-Exclusions in Reducing Gambling Among a Real-World Sample of British Online Casino Players.自愿性自我排除在减少英国在线赌场玩家实际样本中的赌博行为的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Dec;39(4):1833-1848. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10198-y. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
比赛中断:它们是否实现了预期目标?
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Jun;32(2):789-800. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9565-7.
4
Online gambling's moderators: how effective? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在线赌博的监管者:效果如何?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 30;15:519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1846-7.
5
Interactions between risk and protective factors on problem gambling in Asia.亚洲问题赌博中风险因素与保护因素之间的相互作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Jun;31(2):557-72. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9440-3.
6
Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling.赌博场所自我排除干预法对赌博问题的影响综述
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):229-51. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0.
7
The Gambling Craving Scale: Psychometric validation and behavioral outcomes.赌博渴望量表:心理测量学验证及行为结果
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Sep;23(3):512-22. doi: 10.1037/a0015043.
8
The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.赌博相关认知量表(GRCS):编制、验证性因素分析及心理测量学特性
Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):757-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00753.x.
9
Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.自我效能感:迈向行为改变的统一理论
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.