• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Access and reimbursement pathways for digital health solutions and diagnostic devices: Current scenario and challenges.数字健康解决方案和诊断设备的准入与报销途径:现状与挑战
Front Med Technol. 2023 Feb 20;5:1101476. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1101476. eCollection 2023.
2
Dynamic HTA for digital health solutions: opportunities and challenges for patient-centered evaluation.动态卫生技术评估在数字健康解决方案中的应用:以患者为中心的评估的机遇与挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;39(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002726.
3
Success Factors for Scaling Up the Adoption of Digital Therapeutics Towards the Realization of P5 Medicine.扩大数字疗法采用以实现P5医学的成功因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 12;9:854665. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.854665. eCollection 2022.
4
Market access and value-based pricing of digital health applications in Germany.德国数字健康应用的市场准入与基于价值的定价
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jun 13;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00359-y.
5
Performance-based reimbursement for digital therapeutics in Germany: A misconceptualized opportunity.德国数字疗法基于绩效的报销:一个被误解的机遇。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 23;10:20552076241281199. doi: 10.1177/20552076241281199. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Germany's digital health reforms in the COVID-19 era: lessons and opportunities for other countries.德国在新冠疫情时代的数字健康改革:其他国家可借鉴的经验与机遇
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 10;3:94. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0306-7. eCollection 2020.
7
Stakeholders' Perceptions Regarding Digital Therapeutics Reimbursement in South Korea: Qualitative Study.利益相关者对韩国数字治疗报销的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Oct 30;11:e47407. doi: 10.2196/47407.
8
[Digital Health Applications: A Qualitative Study of Approaches to Improve Access to Statutory Health Insurance].[数字健康应用:改善法定医疗保险获取途径的方法的定性研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Jan;84(1):64-74. doi: 10.1055/a-1341-1085. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
AMCP Partnership Forum: The evolving role of digital therapeutics.AMCP 合作论坛:数字疗法的不断演变的角色。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jul;28(7):804-810. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22093. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
Reimbursement of Digital Therapeutics: Future Perspectives in Korea.数字疗法的报销:韩国的未来展望
Korean Circ J. 2022 Apr;52(4):265-279. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0014.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prescribed Digital Health App and Number of Migraine Days: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一款处方数字健康应用程序与偏头痛天数:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2517708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17708.
2
Digital Therapeutics for Cognitive Impairment: Exploring Innovations, Challenges, and Future Prospects.用于认知障碍的数字疗法:探索创新、挑战与未来前景
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 12;27:e73689. doi: 10.2196/73689.
3
International Market Access Strategies for Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Can We Standardize the Process to Faster Patient Access?基于人工智能的医疗设备的国际市场准入策略:我们能否规范流程以更快地让患者获得相关设备?
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Aug 8;1(3):406-412. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.06.011. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - time for a reality check.数字病理学中的人工智能——是时候进行现实核查了。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;22(4):283-291. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-00991-6. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
5
Comparison of health technology assessments for digital therapeutics in Germany, the United Kingdom and France.德国、英国和法国数字疗法的卫生技术评估比较。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 22;11:20552076241308704. doi: 10.1177/20552076241308704. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
7
A transparent and standardized performance measurement platform is needed for on-prescription digital health apps to enable ongoing performance monitoring.处方数字健康应用程序需要一个透明且标准化的性能测量平台,以实现持续的性能监测。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 15;3(11):e0000656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000656. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
A review on the evolving environment of medical device real-world evidence regulation on market access in the USA.美国医疗器械真实世界证据监管在市场准入方面的不断演变环境综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Oct 25;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00582-9.
9
The New Emerging Treatment Choice for Major Depressive Disorders: Digital Therapeutics.主要抑郁症治疗新选择:数字疗法。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1456:307-331. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-4402-2_16.
10
eHealth-Integrated Psychosocial and Physical Interventions for Chronic Pain in Older Adults: Scoping Review.电子健康:整合针对老年人慢性疼痛的心理社会和身体干预措施:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 29;26:e55366. doi: 10.2196/55366.

本文引用的文献

1
How Useful Are Digital Health Terms for Outcomes Research? An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.数字健康术语在结局研究中有多大用处?ISPOR 特别兴趣小组报告。
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1469-1479. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1730.
2
Companion Diagnostics: State of the Art and New Regulations.伴随诊断:最新技术水平与新法规
Biomark Insights. 2021 Oct 11;16:11772719211047763. doi: 10.1177/11772719211047763. eCollection 2021.
3
Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease.临床前阿尔茨海默病数字认知评估的当前进展
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 Jul 20;13(1):e12217. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12217. eCollection 2021.
4
Role of digital therapeutics and the changing future of healthcare.数字疗法的作用与医疗保健不断变化的未来。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2207-2213. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_105_20. eCollection 2020 May.
5
Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics.人工智能在临床和基因组诊断中的应用。
Genome Med. 2019 Nov 19;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8.
6
Mobile Health Technologies in Cardiopulmonary Disease.移动医疗技术在心肺疾病中的应用
Chest. 2020 Mar;157(3):654-664. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
Digital health technology and mobile devices for the management of diabetes mellitus: state of the art.数字健康技术和移动设备在糖尿病管理中的应用:现状。
Diabetologia. 2019 Jun;62(6):877-887. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4864-7. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
8
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.试验之外:对抑郁症、情绪低落或焦虑症数字自助干预措施的现实世界采用情况和参与度的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275.

数字健康解决方案和诊断设备的准入与报销途径:现状与挑战

Access and reimbursement pathways for digital health solutions and diagnostic devices: Current scenario and challenges.

作者信息

Mantovani Andrea, Leopaldi Claudia, Nighswander Cassandra Maria, Di Bidino Rossella

机构信息

Alira Health, Milan, Italy.

Alira Health, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Med Technol. 2023 Feb 20;5:1101476. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1101476. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2023.1101476
PMID:36891483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9986593/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are innovative solutions that use meaningful data to provide evidence-based decisions for the prevention, treatment, and management of diseases. Particular attention is paid to software-based diagnostics (IVDs). With this point of view, a strong connection between DTx and IVDs is observed.

METHODS

We investigated the current regulatory scenarios and reimbursement approaches adopted for DTx and IVDs. The initial assumption was that countries apply different regulations for the access to the market and adopt different reimbursement systems for both DTx and IVDs. The analysis was limited to the US, European countries (Germany, France, and UK), and Australia due to maturity in digital health product adoption and regulatory processes, and recent regulations related to IVDs. The final aim was to provide a general comparative overview and identify those aspects that should be better addressed to support the adoption and commercialization of DTx and IVDs.

RESULTS

Many countries regulate DTx as medical devices or software integrated with a medical device, and some have a more specific pathway than others. Australia has more specific regulations classifying software used in IVD. Some EU countries are adopting similar processes to the Digital Health Applications (DiGA) under Germany's Digitale-Versorgung Gesetz (DVG) law, which deems DTx eligible for reimbursement during the fast access pathway. France is working on a fast-track system to make DTx available to patients and reimbursable by the public system. The US retains some coverage through private insurance, federal and state programs like Medicaid and Veterans Affairs, and out-of-pocket spending. The updated Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) in the EU includes a classification system specifying how software integrated with medical devices, and IVDs specifically must be regulated.

CONCLUSION

The outlook for DTx and IVDs is changing as they are becoming more technologically advanced, and some countries are adapting their device classifications depending on specific features. Our analysis showed the complexity of the issue demonstrating how fragmented are regulatory systems for DTx and IVDs. Differences emerged in terms of definitions, terminology, requested evidence, payment approaches and the overall reimbursement landscape. The complexity is expected to have a direct impact on the commercialization of and access to DTx and IVDs. In this scenario, willingness to pay of different stakeholders is a key theme.

摘要

目标

数字疗法(DTx)是一种创新解决方案,利用有意义的数据为疾病的预防、治疗和管理提供循证决策。尤其关注基于软件的诊断(体外诊断医疗器械)。从这个角度来看,DTx与体外诊断医疗器械之间存在着紧密的联系。

方法

我们调查了DTx和体外诊断医疗器械当前采用的监管情况和报销方式。最初的假设是,各国对产品上市采用不同的法规,并对DTx和体外诊断医疗器械采用不同的报销系统。由于数字健康产品采用和监管流程的成熟度,以及与体外诊断医疗器械相关的最新法规,分析仅限于美国、欧洲国家(德国、法国和英国)以及澳大利亚。最终目的是提供一个总体比较概述,并确定那些为支持DTx和体外诊断医疗器械的采用和商业化而应更好解决的方面。

结果

许多国家将DTx作为医疗器械或与医疗器械集成的软件进行监管,有些国家的监管途径比其他国家更具体。澳大利亚对体外诊断医疗器械中使用的软件有更具体的法规分类。一些欧盟国家正在采用与德国《数字供应法》(DVG)下的数字健康应用程序(DiGA)类似的流程,该流程认为DTx在快速审批途径中有资格获得报销。法国正在建立一个快速通道系统,使患者能够使用DTx并由公共系统报销。美国通过私人保险、联邦和州项目(如医疗补助和退伍军人事务部)以及自付费用保留了一些覆盖范围。欧盟更新的《医疗器械法规》(MDR)和《诊断法规》(IVDR)包括一个分类系统,规定了与医疗器械集成的软件以及体外诊断医疗器械必须如何进行监管。

结论

随着DTx和体外诊断医疗器械在技术上越来越先进,它们的前景正在发生变化,一些国家正在根据特定特征调整其器械分类。我们的分析表明了这个问题的复杂性,展示了DTx和体外诊断医疗器械的监管系统是多么分散。在定义、术语、所需证据、支付方式和总体报销情况方面出现了差异。这种复杂性预计将对DTx和体外诊断医疗器械的商业化和获取产生直接影响。在这种情况下,不同利益相关者的支付意愿是一个关键主题。