Suppr超能文献

中国的数字疗法:全面综述

Digital Therapeutics in China: Comprehensive Review.

作者信息

Jiang Nan, Yu Xiru, Yang Yuxi, Li Guanqiao, He Chanchan, Wang Man Ping, Tham Yih Chung, Wong Tien Yin, Rao Keqin

机构信息

School of Healthcare Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e70955. doi: 10.2196/70955.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software-driven interventions that provide personalized, evidence-based treatments for various medical conditions. China's rapid technological adoption, large population, and supportive government policies position it as a potential global leader in DTx. However, challenges remain in clinical trial standardization, regulatory approval, product development, and reimbursement models. A comprehensive assessment of clinical evidence, commercialization trends, and regulatory frameworks is essential for understanding China's evolving DTx ecosystem and its global implications.

OBJECTIVE

This study systematically reviews and analyzes the DTx landscape in China, focusing on clinical trials, commercial products, regulatory frameworks, and pricing and reimbursement models. The findings provide insights for countries aiming to develop, regulate, and integrate DTx solutions into health care systems.

METHODS

This comprehensive review integrates multiple methodological approaches to examine different aspects of the DTx ecosystem in China. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical trials, searching PubMed, Google Scholar, IEEE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect until July 2024. Meta-analyses used random-effects models, reporting results as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs. For commercial products, a scoping review using the National Medical Products Administration database was performed. Regulatory policies were systematically identified through a manual review of official government sources, while pricing and reimbursement models were analyzed through a comprehensive assessment of public and private insurance policies, government initiatives, and commercial pathways.

RESULTS

: A total of 96 clinical trials on DTx in China were identified, with cognitive disorders (n=21, 22%) and diabetes (n=20, 21%) being the most frequently studied, followed by cardiovascular diseases (n=8, 8%), sleeping disorders (n=6, 6%), and smoking cessation (n=6, 6%). Meta-analysis for diabetes DTx showed a trend toward improved hemoglobin A levels in digital intervention groups compared to controls (SMD -0.96, 95% CI -2.03 to 0.11) but did not reach statistical significance (I²=97%). Meta-analysis for cognitive disorder DTx showed significant improvement in global cognitive function in DTx-treated participants (SMD 0.65, 95% CI 0.37-0.94), despite notable heterogeneity (I²=71.7%). The commercial landscape analysis identified 97 active DTx solutions, primarily targeting cognitive impairment (38 companies), ophthalmic diseases (30 companies), and respiratory diseases (5 companies). The regulatory review highlighted China's reliance on general medical device policies under the National Medical Products Administration rather than DTx-specific regulations, with emerging regional innovation policies supporting industry growth. Pricing analysis revealed diverse reimbursement models, including value-based pricing, private insurance partnerships, and government-facilitated programs.

CONCLUSIONS

China has made substantial progress in DTx development but still faces challenges in clinical trial standardization, regulatory approval, and reimbursement. Key factors driving DTx adoption include targeted indications, standardized clinical trials, streamlined regulation, and diversified pricing models. China's experience provides valuable lessons for other countries with emerging digital health ecosystems as they develop DTx research, regulations, and integration strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024615584; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024615584.

摘要

背景

数字疗法(DTx)是由软件驱动的干预措施,可为各种医疗状况提供个性化的、循证治疗。中国迅速采用技术、人口众多且有政府政策支持,使其有潜力成为数字疗法领域的全球领导者。然而,在临床试验标准化、监管审批、产品开发和报销模式方面仍存在挑战。对临床证据、商业化趋势和监管框架进行全面评估,对于了解中国不断发展的数字疗法生态系统及其全球影响至关重要。

目的

本研究系统回顾并分析中国数字疗法的现状,重点关注临床试验、商业产品、监管框架以及定价和报销模式。研究结果为旨在开发、监管数字疗法解决方案并将其整合到医疗保健系统中的国家提供了见解。

方法

本全面综述整合了多种方法来研究中国数字疗法生态系统的不同方面。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析以评估临床试验,检索了截至2024年7月的PubMed、谷歌学术、IEEE、科学网和科学Direct数据库。荟萃分析使用随机效应模型,结果以标准化均值差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。对于商业产品,使用国家药品监督管理局数据库进行了范围综述。通过对官方政府来源进行人工审查系统识别监管政策,同时通过对公共和私人保险政策、政府举措及商业途径进行全面评估来分析定价和报销模式。

结果

在中国共识别出96项关于数字疗法的临床试验,其中认知障碍(n = 21,22%)和糖尿病(n = 20,21%)是研究最频繁的领域,其次是心血管疾病(n = 8,8%)、睡眠障碍(n = 6,6%)和戒烟(n = 6,6%)。糖尿病数字疗法的荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,数字干预组的糖化血红蛋白水平有改善趋势(SMD -0.96,95% CI -2.03至0.11),但未达到统计学显著性(I² = 97%)。认知障碍数字疗法的荟萃分析显示,接受数字疗法治疗的参与者的整体认知功能有显著改善(SMD 0.65,95% CI 0.37 - 0.94),尽管存在显著异质性(I² = 71.7%)。商业格局分析确定了97种活跃的数字疗法解决方案,主要针对认知障碍(38家公司)、眼科疾病(30家公司)和呼吸系统疾病(5家公司)。监管审查强调中国依赖国家药品监督管理局的一般医疗器械政策而非数字疗法特定法规,同时新兴的区域创新政策支持行业发展。定价分析揭示了多种报销模式,包括基于价值的定价、私人保险合作以及政府推动的项目。

结论

中国在数字疗法开发方面取得了重大进展,但在临床试验标准化、监管审批和报销方面仍面临挑战。推动数字疗法采用的关键因素包括靶向适应症、标准化临床试验、简化监管和多样化定价模式。中国的经验为其他具有新兴数字健康生态系统的国家在开展数字疗法研究、制定法规和整合策略方面提供了宝贵的经验教训。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42024615584;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024615584

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2f/12152435/69ec58da13a1/jmir_v27i1e70955_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验