Suppr超能文献

美国反就业年龄歧视法气候研究针对有与没有自我报告的认知、情感和/或身体方面不同能力/残疾情况的学生、工作人员、教师和管理人员的结果。

ADEA Climate Study results for students, staff, faculty, and administrators with versus without self-reported cognitive, emotional, and/or physical diverse abilities/disabilities.

作者信息

Inglehart Marita R, Taiclet Lynne M, Gül Gülsün

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Psychology, College of Literature, Science & Arts (LS&A), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2025 May;89(5):697-711. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13731.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In 2024, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that 28.7% of adults in the United States experienced some form of disability. The objectives were to assess if respondents who self-identified by positively responding to the question if they had versus did not have "cognitive, emotional, and/or physical diverse abilities/disabilities" differed in perceptions of (a) their academic units' cultural climate, (b) social relationships/social support, (c) mental health/well-being, and (d) academic/professional outcomes. Additional objectives were to analyze these answers by respondent type (i.e., students/staff/faculty/administrators) and to explore relationships between these constructs of interest.

METHODS

A total of 13,008 respondents in the 2022 American Dental Education Association Climate Study answered the question if they had a cognitive, emotional, and/or physical diverse ability/disability, 1805 respondents (13.9%) answered affirmatively.

RESULTS

On average, respondents with diverse abilities/disabilities were less satisfied with the climate of their academic unit (five-point scale with 5 = most positive: 3.38 vs. 3.67; p < 0.001), and considered their culture as less humanistic (3.53 vs. 3.80; p < 0.001) and less inclusive (3.70 vs. 3.90; p < 0.001) than respondents without a diverse ability/disability. Respondents with diverse abilities/disabilities agreed less that they had positive relationships (means: 3.77 vs. 3.96; p < 0.001) and social support (3.69 vs. 3.93; p < 0.001); they had a less positive sense of belonging (3.62 vs. 3.86; p < 0.001) and positive well-being (3.51 vs. 3.82; p < 0.001) and agreed less that they could live up to their academic/professional potential (3.77 vs. 3.97; p < 0.001) than their counterparts. For each respondent group, respondents with diverse abilities/disabilities had less positive responses than respondents without diverse abilities/disabilities. The more positive respondents with diverse abilities/disabilities perceived their institutions' climate, the more they agreed they had positive relationships (r = 0.70; p < 0.001), positive social support (r = 0.72; p < 0.001), a positive sense of belonging (r = 0.76; p < 0.001) and well-being (r = 0.78; p < 0.001), and could reach their potential (r = 0.70; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Students/staff/faculty/administrators/administrators with faculty appointments who self-identify as having "cognitive, emotional, and/or physical diverse abilities/disabilities" differ from those who do not self-identify as such. They have less positive perceptions of their institutions' climate, their social relationships, poorer mental health, and academic/professional outcomes. The fact that climate perceptions are significantly correlated with mental health and academic/professional outcomes should be a call to action for dental educators to create a climate supportive of all members of their communities.

摘要

目标

2024年,美国疾病控制与预防中心报告称,美国28.7%的成年人经历过某种形式的残疾。目标是评估那些通过对是否有“认知、情感和/或身体方面的多样能力/残疾”这一问题给出肯定回答来自我认定的受访者,在以下方面的认知是否存在差异:(a) 他们所在学术单位的文化氛围,(b) 社会关系/社会支持,(c) 心理健康/幸福感,以及(d) 学术/职业成果。其他目标是按受访者类型(即学生/工作人员/教师/管理人员)分析这些答案,并探索这些相关概念之间的关系。

方法

在2022年美国牙科教育协会氛围研究中,共有13008名受访者回答了他们是否有认知、情感和/或身体方面的多样能力/残疾这一问题,1805名受访者(13.9%)给出了肯定回答。

结果

平均而言,有多样能力/残疾的受访者对其学术单位的氛围满意度较低(五分制,5表示最积极:3.38对3.67;p<0.001),并认为他们的文化人文性较差(3.53对3.80;p<0.001)且包容性较差(3.70对3.90;p<0.001),相比没有多样能力/残疾的受访者。有多样能力/残疾的受访者对自己拥有积极关系(均值:3.77对3.96;p<0.001)和社会支持(3.69对3.93;p<0.001)的认同度较低;他们的归属感(3.62对3.86;p<0.001)和幸福感(3.51对3.82;p<0.001)较低,且对自己能够发挥学术/职业潜力的认同度也较低(3.77对3.97;p<0.001),相比他们的同行。对于每个受访者群体,有多样能力/残疾的受访者的积极反馈都少于没有多样能力/残疾的受访者。有多样能力/残疾的受访者对其机构氛围感知越积极,他们就越认同自己拥有积极关系(r=0.70;p<0.001)、积极社会支持(r=0.72;p<0.001)、积极归属感(r=0.76;p<0.001)和幸福感(r=0.78;p<0.001),并且能够发挥自己的潜力(r=0.70;p<0.001)。

结论

自我认定为具有“认知、情感和/或身体方面的多样能力/残疾”的学生/工作人员/教师/有教师职位的管理人员与未作此自我认定的人员不同。他们对自己机构的氛围、社会关系、心理健康和学术/职业成果的认知较不积极。氛围认知与心理健康和学术/职业成果显著相关这一事实,应促使牙科教育工作者采取行动,营造一个支持其社区所有成员的氛围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/073b/12108217/1bcfb711c538/JDD-89-697-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验