• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

救护车使用的适宜性:急救医疗服务技术人员和分诊护士的评估以及患者的认知

Ambulance Use Appropriateness: Emergency Medical Service Technicians' and Triage Nurses' Assessments and Patients' Perceptions.

作者信息

Piras Ilenia, Sanna Francesca, Garau Michele, Sole Gabriele, Piras Giampaolo, d'Aloja Ernesto, Galletta Maura

机构信息

Department of Emergency, SS Trinità Hospital, ASL Cagliari, 09100 Cagliari, Italy.

Geospatial Health and Development, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA 6872, Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2025 May 9;15(5):165. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050165.

DOI:10.3390/nursrep15050165
PMID:40423199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12114553/
Abstract

Part of the workload of ambulance service involves patients with low-acuity health events that do not require the specific resources provided by ambulance services or emergency departments (EDs). The problem of inappropriateness is also present in Italy. However, research is limited to the perspective of triage nurses only, excluding patients and emergency medical service (EMS) staff. This study aims to identify the presence of inappropriate ambulance use in the study context by comparing patients' perception of emergency with appropriateness perspectives of both triage nurses and emergency service staff. A cross-sectional study involving 109 patients transported by ambulance was performed between January and March 2020. Questionnaires were distributed to patients, EMS staff, and triage nurses operating in the chief town and hinterland of a region of Italy. Non-penetrating trauma was the most frequent cause for calling an ambulance. Patients referred that activation of the service was necessary, while triage nurses and EMS technicians were in line in believing the non-urgency of the call due to non-emergent health conditions. Although we cannot conclude that citizens use the emergency system inappropriately, the results of this study make us think about the need to implement educational interventions that increase citizens' knowledge of how the service works and the territorial services available.

摘要

救护车服务的部分工作量涉及那些患有低 acuity 健康事件的患者,这些患者并不需要救护车服务或急诊科(EDs)所提供的特定资源。不恰当性问题在意大利也存在。然而,相关研究仅局限于分诊护士的视角,将患者和紧急医疗服务(EMS)工作人员排除在外。本研究旨在通过比较患者对紧急情况的认知与分诊护士和紧急服务人员对恰当性的看法,来确定在该研究背景下是否存在不恰当使用救护车的情况。2020年1月至3月间开展了一项涉及109名由救护车转运患者的横断面研究。问卷被分发给在意大利某地区主要城镇及腹地工作的患者、EMS 工作人员和分诊护士。非穿透性创伤是呼叫救护车最常见的原因。患者表示有必要启动这项服务,而分诊护士和 EMS 技术人员则一致认为由于健康状况不紧急,此次呼叫并非紧急情况。尽管我们不能得出市民不恰当地使用应急系统的结论,但本研究结果促使我们思考是否有必要实施教育干预措施,以提高市民对该服务如何运作以及可用的地区服务的了解。

相似文献

1
Ambulance Use Appropriateness: Emergency Medical Service Technicians' and Triage Nurses' Assessments and Patients' Perceptions.救护车使用的适宜性:急救医疗服务技术人员和分诊护士的评估以及患者的认知
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 9;15(5):165. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050165.
2
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.
3
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
4
The appropriateness of low-acuity cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following ambulance service secondary telephone triage: A retrospective cohort study.低危病例经救护车服务二次电话分诊后转介至紧急救护车派遣的适宜性:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 13;14(8):e0221158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221158. eCollection 2019.
5
A novel approach for managing the growing demand for ambulance services by low-acuity patients.一种应对低 acuity 患者对救护车服务需求不断增长的新方法。 需注意,这里的“acuity”在医学语境中常表示“敏锐度”“ acuity level”可表示“病情严重程度”等,由于原文未明确其具体所指,翻译时保留了英文。如果能结合更多背景信息,翻译会更精准。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Sep;40(4):378-384. doi: 10.1071/AH15134.
6
Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch.针对“非紧急”999急救服务呼叫者的计算机辅助评估与建议:对救护车调度的潜在影响
Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):178-83. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.178.
7
Does the Norwegian emergency medical dispatch classification as non-urgent predict no need for pre-hospital medical treatment? An observational study.挪威紧急医疗调度将情况分类为非紧急是否预示着无需院前医疗救治?一项观察性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 May 6;24:65. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0258-8.
8
Using On-scene EMS Responders' Assessment and Electronic Patient Care Records to Evaluate the Suitability of EMD-triaged, Low-acuity Calls for Secondary Nurse Triage in 911 Centers.利用现场急救人员的评估和电子患者护理记录来评估急救医疗调度员分诊的低 acuity 呼叫在 911 中心进行二级护士分诊的适用性。 (注:原文中“low-acuity”可能存在拼写错误,正确的可能是“low-acuity”,直译为“低 acuity”,这里可结合语境理解为“低紧急程度”等意思,具体准确含义需结合专业背景进一步确定。)
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Feb;31(1):46-57. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005567. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
9
Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?伦敦救护车服务的滥用情况:程度如何?原因何在?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;15(6):368-70. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.6.368.
10
Implementation of prehospital dispatch protocols that triage low-acuity patients to advice-line nurses.实施院前调度协议,将低危患者分诊至咨询护士。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):481-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.811563. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Low health literacy is associated with patient-clinician discrepancy in the perceived severity of medical emergencies.健康素养低下与患者和临床医生在医疗紧急情况严重程度认知上的差异有关。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;13:1656755. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1656755. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Awareness of Triage Systems and Waiting Times During Emergency Department Visits in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯东部省份急诊科就诊时公众对分诊系统和等待时间的认知
Cureus. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e51988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51988. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Telephone Triage for Emergency Patients Reduces Unnecessary Ambulance Use: A Propensity Score Analysis With Population-Based Data in Osaka City, Japan.电话分诊可减少急诊患者不必要的救护车使用:基于日本大阪市人群数据的倾向评分分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;10:896506. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896506. eCollection 2022.
3
The implementation of the nationwide out-of-hours phone number 1733 in Belgium: analysis of efficiency and safety.
比利时实施全国性夜间电话热线 1733:效率与安全分析。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Mar 15;22:e7. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000098.
4
Mode of Arrival to the Emergency Department and Outcomes in Nontraumatic Critically Ill Adults.非创伤性危重症成年患者到达急诊科的方式及预后
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Feb 25;3(3):e0350. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000350. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Ambulance use for 'primary care' problems: an ethnographic study of seeking and providing help in a UK ambulance service.救护车用于“初级保健”问题:对英国救护服务中寻求和提供帮助的民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e033037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033037.
6
A descriptive study of registered nurses' application of the triage scale RETTS©; a Swedish reliability study.一项关于注册护士应用分诊量表RETTS©的描述性研究;一项瑞典的信度研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 May;38:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
Appropriateness of cases presenting in the emergency department following ambulance service secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.救护车服务二级电话分诊后在急诊科就诊病例的适宜性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 15;7(10):e016845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016845.
8
Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.使用救护车转运至急诊科的地理差异。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):533-543.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 May 27.
9
A high proportion of prehospital emergency patients are not transported by ambulance: a retrospective cohort study in Northern Finland.很高比例的院前急救患者并非由救护车运送:芬兰北部的一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 May;61(5):549-556. doi: 10.1111/aas.12889.
10
Inappropriate Ambulance Use: A Qualitative Study of Paramedics' Views.不适当的救护车使用:一项关于护理人员观点的定性研究。
Healthc Policy. 2016 Feb;11(3):67-79.