Egger Thomas, Buchheim Anna, Gander Manuela
Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Refugio München, Rosenheimer Str. 38, 81669 Munich, Germany.
Brain Sci. 2025 May 9;15(5):495. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050495.
Although the relationship between attachment and mental health has been widely studied, no systematic review has focused specifically on refugee populations. This systematic review examines associations between attachment patterns and psychological distress in refugees-a population at elevated risk for mental health disorders due to forced displacement and trauma. Following PRISMA guidelines. we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (last search: 5 October 2024). Studies were included if they examined the relationship between attachment and psychological distress or disorders in refugees, presented empirical data, were peer-reviewed, were published from 2004 onward in English, and met quality criteria based on CASP and JBI checklists. Studies were excluded if they did not focus on refugees, lacked empirical data, did not assess both attachment and psychological distress, were not peer-reviewed, or consisted of grey literature. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Of 2.951 records, 11 studies with 1.319 participants met inclusion criteria. Five studies examined adults, four children, and two adolescents. Insecure and unresolved attachment were consistently linked to higher psychological distress, particularly PTSD, especially in adults. In children, insecure attachment was associated with parental mental health problems and dysfunctional parenting, whereas secure attachment buffered the effects of parental PTSD. Limitations include small sample sizes, cultural and linguistic complexity, inconsistent definitions of "refugee", and varied assessment methods. Attachment insecurity is strongly associated with psychological distress in refugees, mirroring patterns in Western clinical populations. Findings support the integration of attachment-informed approaches into refugee mental health care. Funding: This review was funded by the Köhler Stiftung and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024590759).
尽管依恋与心理健康之间的关系已得到广泛研究,但尚无系统综述专门聚焦于难民群体。本系统综述考察了依恋模式与难民心理困扰之间的关联——由于被迫流离失所和创伤,难民群体患心理健康障碍的风险较高。遵循PRISMA指南,我们检索了PubMed、PsycINFO和科学网(最后检索日期:2024年10月5日)。如果研究考察了难民中依恋与心理困扰或障碍之间的关系、提供了实证数据、经过同行评审、2004年以后以英文发表且符合基于CASP和JBI清单的质量标准,则纳入研究。如果研究未聚焦于难民、缺乏实证数据、未同时评估依恋和心理困扰、未经过同行评审或由灰色文献组成,则将其排除。进行了叙述性综合分析。在2951条记录中,11项研究(涉及1319名参与者)符合纳入标准。5项研究针对成年人,4项针对儿童,2项针对青少年。不安全和未解决的依恋始终与较高的心理困扰相关,尤其是创伤后应激障碍,在成年人中尤为明显。在儿童中,不安全依恋与父母心理健康问题和功能失调的养育方式相关,而安全依恋则缓冲了父母创伤后应激障碍的影响。局限性包括样本量小、文化和语言复杂性、“难民”定义不一致以及评估方法多样。依恋不安全与难民的心理困扰密切相关,这与西方临床人群的模式相似。研究结果支持将基于依恋的方法纳入难民心理健康护理。资金来源:本综述由科勒基金会资助,并在国际系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号:CRD42024590759)。