Munazzam Shahzad Waqas, Rai Vikramaditya, Nousheen Shaista, Ullah Basharat, Sharif Sajjal, Mohammed Cara
Department of Orthopedics, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 24;66:103034. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103034. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Knee arthroplasty (KA) represents a transformative milestone in the management of degenerative knee conditions, significantly improving patient mobility and quality of life. Over the decades, material innovations have driven advancements in implant design, addressing challenges such as wear, biocompatibility, and longevity. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of traditional and cutting-edge materials used in KA, analyzing their properties, clinical outcomes, and economic implications while identifying future research directions. Traditional materials, including cobalt-chromium and titanium alloys, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), and ceramics, have been the cornerstone of knee implant technology. These materials offer durability, wear resistance, and compatibility with biological tissues, but long-term complications, such as polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening, have necessitated further advancements. Recent developments, such as highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and vitamin E-infused polyethylene, have improved wear resistance and oxidative stability, thereby reducing revision rates. Similarly, ceramic materials, including zirconia-toughened alumina and silicon nitride, have emerged as promising alternatives due to their exceptional wear resistance and biocompatibility, although brittleness and higher manufacturing costs remain barriers to widespread use. Advancements in metallic alloys, such as oxidized zirconium and porous tantalum, have further refined KA implants. These materials exhibit superior osseointegration, reduced stress shielding, and improved implant fixation, enhancing patient outcomes. Additionally, the adoption of bioactive coatings like hydroxyapatite and the utilization of 3D-printed personalized implants have revolutionized the fabrication process, offering patient-specific solutions and improved bone integration. Innovations in smart technologies, including self-healing materials, antibacterial surfaces, and sensor-integrated implants, present exciting opportunities for real-time monitoring, infection prevention, and adaptive design. The biomechanical properties of these materials significantly influence joint kinematics, wear patterns, and implant survival rates. Materials with lower elastic moduli, mimicking the properties of natural bone, minimize stress shielding and improve load distribution. Advanced ceramics and polyethylene composites reduce debris generation and osteolysis, contributing to extended implant longevity. Biological responses, including reduced hypersensitivity and enhanced osteoblast differentiation, further underline the importance of material selection in KA. Clinical studies consistently demonstrate the efficacy of advanced materials in reducing revision rates and improving patient-reported outcomes. For instance, oxidized zirconium implants and ceramic-on-HXLPE bearings show superior long-term performance compared to traditional cobalt-chromium and metal-on-polyethylene counterparts. Furthermore, personalized implants have been associated with enhanced functional outcomes, natural joint feel, and improved quality of life. Despite higher upfront costs, advanced materials exhibit favorable cost-effectiveness due to reduced complications and extended implant lifespan. However, challenges persist, including the limited availability of long-term clinical data, manufacturing complexities, and accessibility disparities. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies evaluating the durability of novel materials, further development of bioactive and smart technologies, and the integration of computational modeling to optimize implant design. Additionally, addressing socioeconomic barriers is critical to ensuring equitable access to these innovations.
膝关节置换术(KA)是退行性膝关节疾病治疗中的一个变革性里程碑,显著改善了患者的活动能力和生活质量。几十年来,材料创新推动了植入物设计的进步,解决了诸如磨损、生物相容性和使用寿命等挑战。本综述对膝关节置换术中使用的传统材料和前沿材料进行了全面评估,分析了它们的特性、临床结果和经济影响,同时确定了未来的研究方向。传统材料,包括钴铬合金、钛合金、超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)和陶瓷,一直是膝关节植入技术的基石。这些材料具有耐用性、耐磨性以及与生物组织的相容性,但长期并发症,如聚乙烯磨损和无菌性松动,促使了进一步的发展。最近的进展,如高度交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)和含维生素E的聚乙烯,提高了耐磨性和氧化稳定性,从而降低了翻修率。同样,陶瓷材料,包括氧化锆增韧氧化铝和氮化硅,因其出色的耐磨性和生物相容性而成为有前景的替代品,尽管脆性和较高的制造成本仍然是广泛应用的障碍。金属合金的进展,如氧化锆和多孔钽,进一步改进了膝关节置换植入物。这些材料表现出优异的骨整合性、减少的应力屏蔽和改善的植入物固定,提高了患者的治疗效果。此外,采用羟基磷灰石等生物活性涂层以及使用3D打印个性化植入物彻底改变了制造过程,提供了针对患者的解决方案并改善了骨整合。智能技术的创新,包括自修复材料、抗菌表面和集成传感器的植入物,为实时监测、感染预防和自适应设计带来了令人兴奋的机会。这些材料的生物力学特性显著影响关节运动学、磨损模式和植入物存活率。具有较低弹性模量、模仿天然骨特性的材料可将应力屏蔽降至最低并改善载荷分布。先进的陶瓷和聚乙烯复合材料减少了碎屑产生和骨溶解,有助于延长植入物使用寿命。生物反应,包括降低的超敏反应和增强的成骨细胞分化,进一步强调了膝关节置换术中材料选择的重要性。临床研究一致证明先进材料在降低翻修率和改善患者报告结果方面的有效性。例如,与传统的钴铬合金和金属对聚乙烯相比,氧化锆植入物和陶瓷对HXLPE轴承显示出卓越的长期性能。此外,个性化植入物与增强的功能结果、自然的关节感觉和改善的生活质量相关。尽管前期成本较高,但由于并发症减少和植入物使用寿命延长,先进材料显示出良好的成本效益。然而,挑战依然存在,包括长期临床数据有限、制造复杂性和可及性差异。未来的研究应侧重于评估新型材料耐久性的纵向研究、生物活性和智能技术的进一步发展以及计算建模的整合,以优化植入物设计。此外,解决社会经济障碍对于确保公平获得这些创新至关重要。