Solomon P R
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1977 Apr;91(2):407-17. doi: 10.1037/h0077330.
Bilateral aspiration of the dorsal hippocampus produced a disrupttion of blocking of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response in Kamin's two-stage paradigm (Experiment 1) but had no effect on the formation of a Pavlovian conditioned inhibitor (Experiment 2). The results of Experiment 1 indicated that normal animals and those with cortical lesions given conditioning to a light-plus-tone conditioned stimulus (CS) gave conditioned responses (CRs) to both the light and the tone during nonreinforced presentations of each (test phase). If, however, compound conditioning was preceded by tone acquisition, only the tone elicited a CR during testing; that is, blocking was observed. In rabbits with hippocampal lesions, however, CRs were given to both the light and the tone during testing whether or not compound conditioning was preceded by tone acquisition. The data from Experiment 2 showed that rabbits with hippocampal lesions could discriminate as well as normal rabbits and those with cortical lesions between a light (CS+) and light plus tone (CS-). In addition, when the inhibitory tone was subsequently paired with the unconditioned stimulus in retardation testing, animals in all three lesion conditions acquired the CR at the same rate. Thus, it appears that hippocampal lesions do not disrupt conditioned inhibition. The results of these experiments were taken as support for the view that the hippocampus is responsible for "tuning out" stimuli that have no adaptive value to the organism.
双侧背侧海马体损毁导致家兔在卡明两阶段范式中对眨眼膜反应的阻断受到破坏(实验1),但对巴甫洛夫条件性抑制的形成没有影响(实验2)。实验1的结果表明,正常动物以及接受光加音调条件刺激(CS)条件作用的皮层损伤动物,在每个条件刺激非强化呈现期间(测试阶段),对光和音调都产生条件反应(CR)。然而,如果在复合条件作用之前先进行音调习得,那么在测试期间只有音调能引发条件反应;也就是说,观察到了阻断现象。但是,在海马体损伤的家兔中,无论复合条件作用之前是否进行音调习得,在测试期间对光和音调都会产生条件反应。实验2的数据表明,海马体损伤的家兔与正常家兔以及皮层损伤的家兔一样,能够区分光(CS+)和光加音调(CS-)。此外,在延迟测试中,当抑制性音调随后与无条件刺激配对时,所有三种损伤条件下的动物以相同的速率习得条件反应。因此,似乎海马体损伤不会破坏条件性抑制。这些实验的结果被视为支持以下观点:海马体负责“忽略”对机体没有适应性价值的刺激。