• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.重新思考素食主义:素食者与非素食者在基本人类价值观认同上的差异。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323202. eCollection 2025.
2
Vegetarianism and cardiometabolic disease risk factors: Differences between South Asian and US adults.素食主义与心血管代谢疾病风险因素:南亚成年人与美国成年人之间的差异
Nutrition. 2016 Sep;32(9):975-84. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
3
Brazilian Vegetarian Population-Influence of Type of Diet, Motivation and Sociodemographic Variables on Quality of Life Measured by Specific Tool (VEGQOL).巴西素食人群-饮食类型、动机和社会人口学变量对特定工具(VEGQOL)测量的生活质量的影响。
Nutrients. 2020 May 14;12(5):1406. doi: 10.3390/nu12051406.
4
The Psychosocial Aspects of Vegetarian Diets: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Motivations, Risks, and Limitations in Daily Life.素食饮食的心理社会方面:对日常生活中动机、风险和限制的横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 1;16(15):2504. doi: 10.3390/nu16152504.
5
Self-objectification, feminist activism and conformity to feminine norms among female vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, and non-vegetarians.女性素食主义者、半素食者和非素食者的自我客体化、女权主义行动主义和对女性规范的遵从。
Eat Behav. 2014 Jan;15(1):171-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
6
A Study on the relationship between orthorexia and vegetarianism using the BOT (Bratman Test for Orthorexia).一项使用BOT(饮食强迫症布拉特曼测试)对饮食强迫症与素食主义之间关系的研究。
Psychiatr Pol. 2017 Dec 30;51(6):1133-1144. doi: 10.12740/PP/75739.
7
Personality Profiles, Values and Empathy: Differences between Lacto-Ovo-Vegetarians and Vegans.性格特征、价值观与同理心:蛋奶素食者与纯素食者之间的差异
Forsch Komplementmed. 2016;23(2):95-102. doi: 10.1159/000445369. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
Plant-Based Meat consumption value: vegetarian and non-vegetarian.植物性肉类的消费价值:素食者和非素食者。
Appetite. 2025 Aug 1;212:108015. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108015. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
9
Quality of Life of Brazilian Vegetarians Measured by the WHOQOL-BREF: Influence of Type of Diet, Motivation and Sociodemographic Data.巴西素食者的生活质量通过 WHOQOL-BREF 进行衡量:饮食类型、动机和社会人口学数据的影响。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 30;13(8):2648. doi: 10.3390/nu13082648.
10
Which Is a Good Diet-Veg or Non-veg? Faith-Based Vegetarianism for Protection From Obesity-a Myth or Actuality?素食还是非素食,哪种饮食更好?基于信仰的素食主义是否有助于预防肥胖,这是一个神话还是现实?
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1276-1280. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03658-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of personality trait differences between omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans.杂食者、素食者和严格素食者之间人格特质差异的荟萃分析。
Appetite. 2023 Dec 1;191:107085. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107085. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
2
Forty-five years of research on vegetarianism and veganism: A systematic and comprehensive literature review of quantitative studies.45年素食主义和纯素食主义研究:定量研究的系统全面文献综述
Heliyon. 2023 May 9;9(5):e16091. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16091. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Differences among vegans, non-vegan vegetarians, pescatarians, and omnivores in perceived social disapproval and approval as a function of diet and source of treatment.纯素食者、非纯素素食者、鱼素者和杂食者在因饮食和治疗来源而感知到的社会不赞成和赞成方面的差异。
J Soc Psychol. 2023 May 4;163(3):381-393. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2158059. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Why They Eat What They Eat: Comparing 18 Eating Motives Among Omnivores and Vegns.他们为何选择其所选食物:比较杂食者和素食者的18种饮食动机
Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 21;9:780614. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.780614. eCollection 2022.
5
Differences Between Omnivores and Vegetarians in Personality Profiles, Values, and Empathy: A Systematic Review.杂食者与素食者在人格特征、价值观和同理心方面的差异:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 7;12:579700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579700. eCollection 2021.
6
Pro-environmental behavior predicts adherence to plant-based diets.促进环保的行为可预测对植物性饮食的遵守程度。
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105243. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105243. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Measuring the Refined Theory of Individual Values in 49 Cultural Groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire.在 49 个文化群体中测量个体价值观的精细化理论:修订后的肖像价值观问卷的心理测量学。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):1005-1019. doi: 10.1177/1073191121998760. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Dietary similarity of friends and lovers: Vegetarianism, omnivorism, and personal relationships.朋友和恋人饮食的相似性:素食主义、杂食主义与人际关系。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Sep 3;161(5):519-525. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1867042. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
9
An Empirical Comparison of Human Value Models.人类价值模型的实证比较
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01643. eCollection 2018.
10
The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions.素食主义心理学:最新进展与未来方向。
Appetite. 2018 Dec 1;131:125-138. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

重新思考素食主义:素食者与非素食者在基本人类价值观认同上的差异。

Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.

作者信息

Nezlek John B

机构信息

Center for Climate Change and Social Transformations, Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Psychological Sciences, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, Unitd States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323202. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323202
PMID:40434968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12118818/
Abstract

Differences between the basic human values of vegetarians and non-vegetarians were examined in three studies of samples of adults drawn from general populations, one in the US and two in Poland. Vegetarians were oversampled in the US study (514 vegetarians, 540 non-vegetarians) and in one study in Poland (301 vegetarians, 335 non-vegetarians). In the other Polish study, there 68 vegetarians and 1943 non-vegetarians. Values were measured using Schwartz's Portrait Value Questionnaire. Across all three studies, Benevolence, Security, and Conformity values were significantly less important for vegetarians than they were for non-vegetarians, although the difference for Conformity was marginally significant (p < .10) in the US study. Across all three studies, vegetarians also endorsed Tradition values less strongly than non-vegetarians, although this difference was not statistically significant in the US study (p = .12). Across all three studies, vegetarians endorsed Stimulation, Achievement, and Power values more strongly than non-vegetarians did. There was only one value, Self-direction, for which the difference between vegetarians and non-vegetarians varied between the two countries. In the US, Self-direction values were more important for non-vegetarians than they were for vegetarians, whereas in Poland the difference was in the opposite direction. Across the three studies, there were only a few instances in which differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians varied as a function of respondents' gender. These results suggest that following a vegetarian diet represents a manifestation of values that emphasize independence and individuality, a possibility that is somewhat at odds with how vegetarianism is often discussed.

摘要

在三项针对从普通人群中抽取的成年人样本的研究中,对素食者和非素食者的基本人类价值观差异进行了考察,其中一项研究在美国开展,另外两项在波兰进行。在美国的研究(514名素食者、540名非素食者)以及波兰的一项研究(301名素食者、335名非素食者)中,素食者为超样本。在波兰的另一项研究中,有68名素食者和1943名非素食者。使用施瓦茨的肖像价值观问卷来测量价值观。在所有三项研究中,仁爱、安全和遵从价值观对素食者的重要性显著低于对非素食者的重要性,尽管在美国的研究中,遵从价值观的差异勉强显著(p < 0.10)。在所有三项研究中,素食者对传统价值观的认同也不如非素食者强烈,尽管在美国的研究中这种差异没有统计学意义(p = 0.12)。在所有三项研究中,素食者对刺激、成就和权力价值观的认同比非素食者更强烈。只有一种价值观,即自主导向,在两个国家中素食者和非素食者之间的差异有所不同。在美国,自主导向价值观对非素食者比对素食者更重要,而在波兰,差异方向相反。在这三项研究中,只有少数情况下素食者和非素食者之间的差异会因受访者的性别而有所不同。这些结果表明,遵循素食饮食代表了一种强调独立和个性的价值观的体现,这一可能性与人们通常对素食主义的讨论方式有些不一致。