• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 49 个文化群体中测量个体价值观的精细化理论:修订后的肖像价值观问卷的心理测量学。

Measuring the Refined Theory of Individual Values in 49 Cultural Groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire.

机构信息

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):1005-1019. doi: 10.1177/1073191121998760. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1177/1073191121998760
PMID:33682477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131418/
Abstract

Researchers around the world are applying the recently revised Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ-RR) to measure the 19 values in Schwartz's refined values theory. We assessed the internal reliability, circular structure, measurement model, and measurement invariance of values measured by this questionnaire across 49 cultural groups ( = 53,472) and 32 language versions. The PVQ-RR reliably measured 15 of the 19 values in the vast majority of groups and two others in most groups. The fit of the theory-based measurement models supported the differentiation of almost all values in every cultural group. Almost all values were measured invariantly across groups at the configural and metric level. A multidimensional scaling analysis revealed that the PVQ-RR perfectly reproduced the theorized order of the 19 values around the circle across groups. The current study established the PVQ-RR as a sound instrument to measure and to compare the hierarchies and correlates of values across cultures.

摘要

世界各地的研究人员正在应用最近修订的 Portrait Value Questionnaire(PVQ-RR)来衡量 Schwartz 精细化价值观理论中的 19 种价值观。我们评估了该问卷在 49 个文化群体(=53472)和 32 种语言版本中测量的价值观的内部可靠性、循环结构、测量模型和测量不变性。PVQ-RR 在绝大多数群体中可靠地测量了 19 种价值观中的 15 种,在大多数群体中还测量了另外两种。基于理论的测量模型的拟合支持了几乎所有群体中几乎所有价值观的区分。几乎所有的价值观在组间配置和度量水平上都是不变的。多维尺度分析显示,PVQ-RR 在群体间完美再现了 19 种价值观在循环中的理论顺序。本研究确立了 PVQ-RR 是一种可靠的工具,可用于测量和比较跨文化的价值观层次结构和相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9131418/1b15f4d4d3bf/10.1177_1073191121998760-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9131418/683b8782016b/10.1177_1073191121998760-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9131418/1b15f4d4d3bf/10.1177_1073191121998760-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9131418/683b8782016b/10.1177_1073191121998760-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c2/9131418/1b15f4d4d3bf/10.1177_1073191121998760-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the Refined Theory of Individual Values in 49 Cultural Groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire.在 49 个文化群体中测量个体价值观的精细化理论:修订后的肖像价值观问卷的心理测量学。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):1005-1019. doi: 10.1177/1073191121998760. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Assessing the Alignment of Large Language Models With Human Values for Mental Health Integration: Cross-Sectional Study Using Schwartz's Theory of Basic Values.评估大型语言模型与人类心理健康整合价值观的一致性:使用施瓦茨基本价值观理论的横断面研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 9;11:e55988. doi: 10.2196/55988.
3
Comparing results of an exact vs. an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: a cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values.比较精确测量与近似(贝叶斯)测量不变性检验的结果:使用一个衡量 19 个人类价值观的量表进行跨国说明。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 8;5:982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982. eCollection 2014.
4
Testing and Extending Schwartz Refined Value Theory Using a Best-Worst Scaling Approach.采用最佳最差标度法检验和扩展施瓦茨精细化价值理论。
Assessment. 2019 Mar;26(2):166-180. doi: 10.1177/1073191116683799. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
5
Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire.环境研究中的价值衡量:一项环境画像价值问卷测试。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 23;9:564. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564. eCollection 2018.
6
Values and Behavior Among Minorities in Southwest China: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Refined Value Theory.中国西南地区少数民族的价值观与行为:精致价值理论的跨文化验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 2;10:1750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01750. eCollection 2019.
7
Assessing measurement invariance of MSQOL-54 across Italian and English versions.评估 MSQOL-54 在意大利用英文和英文版之间的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):783-791. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02352-0. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
8
The Twenty Item Values Inventory (TwIVI) in Portuguese Adults: Factorial Structure, Internal Consistency, and Criterion-Related Validity.葡萄牙成年人的二十项价值观量表(TwIVI):因子结构、内部一致性和效标关联效度。
J Pers Assess. 2023 Jan-Feb;105(1):22-33. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2048844. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
10
Dimensional Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised (SPQ-BR) Scores Across American and Spanish Samples.分裂型人格问卷简版修订版(SPQ - BR)分数在美国和西班牙样本中的维度结构与测量不变性
J Pers Disord. 2017 Aug;31(4):522-541. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2016_30_266. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Unifying work values: establishing a circular framework based on basic human values.统一工作价值观:基于基本人类价值观建立一个循环框架。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1526799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526799. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating the role of Arabic language in sustaining socio-cultural identity and family values in Emirati society.探究阿拉伯语在维护阿联酋社会的社会文化身份和家庭价值观方面的作用。
Front Sociol. 2025 Aug 1;10:1641732. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1641732. eCollection 2025.
3
Constructing Schwartz values framework using the Rokeach values survey: Human value measurement in the longitudinal internet survey for social sciences.

本文引用的文献

1
The Complexities of "Minding the Gap": Perceived Discrepancies Between Values and Behavior Affect Well-Being.“留意差距”的复杂性:价值观与行为之间的感知差异影响幸福感。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 9;10:736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00736. eCollection 2019.
2
Personal values in human life.人类生活中的个人价值观。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;1(9):630-639. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0185-3. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
3
An Empirical Comparison of Human Value Models.人类价值模型的实证比较
使用罗克奇价值观调查问卷构建施瓦茨价值观框架:社会科学纵向互联网调查中的人类价值观测量。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0329179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329179. eCollection 2025.
4
Co-RESPOND: a federated network of cohorts on mental health and adversity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges, solutions and recommendations for retrospective data harmonization.Co-RESPOND:COVID-19大流行期间心理健康与逆境队列的联合网络。回顾性数据协调的挑战、解决方案与建议。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2517920. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2517920. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
5
Implicit bias towards people with disability in Australia: relationship with personal values.澳大利亚对残疾人的隐性偏见:与个人价值观的关系。
Aust J Psychol. 2025 May 26;77(1):2507626. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2507626. eCollection 2025.
6
Construct Validity, Dimensionality, and Internal Consistency of Psycho-social Questionnaires in Indian Young Adults: A Cross-sectional EFA-PCA-based Study.印度青年成人心理社会问卷的结构效度、维度性和内部一致性:一项基于探索性因子分析-主成分分析的横断面研究。
Ann Neurosci. 2025 Jul 9:09727531251347182. doi: 10.1177/09727531251347182.
7
Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.重新思考素食主义:素食者与非素食者在基本人类价值观认同上的差异。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323202. eCollection 2025.
8
Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Nurses' Work Value Scale: a cross-sectional study.护士工作价值观量表中文版的翻译及心理测量学验证:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 14;24(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03161-2.
9
The Relationship Between Personal Values and Leisure-Time Exercise: A Three-Wave Study.个人价值观与休闲锻炼之间的关系:一项三阶段研究。
Psych J. 2025 Jun;14(3):428-440. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70012. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
10
Academic research values: Conceptualization and initial steps of scale development.学术研究价值:量表开发的概念化及初步步骤。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0318086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318086. eCollection 2025.
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01643. eCollection 2018.
4
Fitting motivational content and process: A systematic investigation of fit between value framing and self-regulation.适配激励内容和过程:价值框架与自我调节之间适配关系的系统研究。
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):973-989. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12369. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
5
Rotation to Perfect Congruence and the Cross Validation of Component Weights Across Populations.旋转至完全一致及跨人群成分权重的交叉验证
Multivariate Behav Res. 1986 Jan 1;21(1):41-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2101_3.
6
Desired emotions across cultures: A value-based account.跨文化的理想情绪:基于价值观的阐述。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul;111(1):67-82. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000072. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
Comparing results of an exact vs. an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: a cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values.比较精确测量与近似(贝叶斯)测量不变性检验的结果:使用一个衡量 19 个人类价值观的量表进行跨国说明。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 8;5:982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982. eCollection 2014.
8
Personality traits and personal values: a meta-analysis.人格特质和个人价值观:一项荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;19(1):3-29. doi: 10.1177/1088868314538548. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
9
How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages.个人价值观如何以及何时指导我们的态度和社交行为?解释态度-价值观关联的跨文化变异性。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;139(5):1113-47. doi: 10.1037/a0031347. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10
Refining the theory of basic individual values.完善基本个体价值观理论。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):663-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029393. Epub 2012 Jul 23.