Cortés Francisca Pérez, Ampuero Daniela, Alba Valentina, Balin María José, Iturra Alejandra, Ayala Felipe, Giannotti Michele
Adolfo Ibañez University, Psychology, Diagonal Las Torres 2640, Santiago, Peñalolén, Chile.
San Sebastian University, Lago Panguipulli 1390, Puerto Montt, Los Lagos, Chile.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 28;25(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07747-1.
Perinatal depression has been extensively studied in women, but its impact on fathers remains underexplored, despite evidence showing a prevalence of around 10% in men. This study aimed to validate the Perinatal Affective Assessment Scale for Fathers (PAPA) and its maternal counterpart (PAMA) in a Chilean population, addressing the gender-specific manifestations of perinatal affective symptoms. A quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational design was employed, including 80 fathers and 94 mothers. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed excellent fit indices for both scales. For the PAPA scale, the respecified model showed CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.004, RMSEA = 0.000 (90% CI = 0.000-0.000), and SRMR = 0.065. For the PAMA scale, the respecified model also showed CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.004, RMSEA = 0.000 (90% CI = 0.000-0.000), and SRMR = 0.046. Additionally, significant differences were observed between PAPA and PAMA scores, highlighting higher affective symptomatology among fathers. The results confirm the validity and reliability of the scales, emphasizing the importance of incorporating fathers into perinatal mental health evaluations from a dyadic perspective.
围产期抑郁症在女性中已得到广泛研究,但其对父亲的影响仍未得到充分探索,尽管有证据表明男性患病率约为10%。本研究旨在验证智利人群中父亲围产期情感评估量表(PAPA)及其母亲对应量表(PAMA),探讨围产期情感症状的性别特异性表现。采用了定量、横断面和相关性设计,纳入了80名父亲和94名母亲。验证性因素分析显示两个量表的拟合指数都非常好。对于PAPA量表,重新指定的模型显示CFI = 1.000,TLI = 1.004,RMSEA = 0.000(90%CI = 0.000 - 0.000),SRMR = 0.065。对于PAMA量表,重新指定的模型也显示CFI = 1.000,TLI = 1.004,RMSEA = 0.000(90%CI = 0.000 - 0.000),SRMR = 0.046。此外,观察到PAPA和PAMA得分之间存在显著差异,突出了父亲中更高的情感症状。结果证实了量表的有效性和可靠性,强调了从二元角度将父亲纳入围产期心理健康评估的重要性。